A technical Note on Web Evaluation Questionnaire & its analysis

Table - 4: Criteria for Cumulative Analysis - Web Design
Q. No.		I	II	III	IV	V	VI
3	Clarity w.r.t. menu items on the MOSDAC homepage	Yes					No
9	Whether some more processing information to be hosted on MOSDAC website	No					Yes
13	Whether the interaction forum facility on MOSDAC site used by respondent	Yes					No
14	Whether the respondent would like to recommend this web site to others	Very likely		Somewhat likely			not worth recommending
16	Grading of MOSDAC Website on the overall content	Excellent	Good	Average		Poor	Very Poor
16	Grading of Website on the ease of navigation	Excellent	Good	Average		Poor	Very Poor
16	Grading of Website on the overall look	Excellent	Good	Average		Poor	Very Poor
17	The user can see where s/he is on the site	Strongly Agree	Agree		Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
17	The style is consistent throughout the site	Strongly Agree	Agree		Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
17	The links are current and working	Strongly Agree	Agree		Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
17	The Visuals enhance the message/purpose of the site	Strongly Agree	Agree		Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
17	The site is interesting	Strongly Agree	Agree		Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
18	Suitable answers found to questions while browsing the website	Yes					No
	OPTIONS OF THE GRAPH	VERY GOOD	GOOD	AVERAGE	UN-DECIDED	BAD	VERY BAD

Table - 5: Criteria for Cumulative Analysis - Data Usability Graph
Q. No.		I	II	III	IV	V	VI
11	Whether the downloaded MOSDAC data archived and shared within the respondent’s institution/organization ?	Yes		No
12	Whether any research paper/article published using MOSDAC data.	Yes		No
17	The information of this Website is accurate and appropriate for the intended audience	Strongly Agree	Agree		Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
17	The information of this Website is timely and up-to-date	Strongly Agree	Agree		Undecided	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
	OPTIONS OF THE GRAPH	VERY GOOD	GOOD	AVERAGE	UNDECIDED	BAD	VERY BAD