Šablona závěrečné práce
Yüklə 1,05 Mb.
|
Cordon, S. L., Finney, & Sara J. (2008). Measurement invariance of the mindful attention awareness scale across adult attachment style. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 40(4), 228-245. Davis, T.J., Morris, M. & Drake, M. M. (2016). The moderation effect of mindfulness on the relationship between adult attachment and wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 115-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.080 Feliu-Soler, A., Soler, J., Luciano, J. V., Cebolla, A., Elices, M., Demarzo, M., & Garc韆-Campayo, J. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Nonattachment Scale (NAS) and its relationship with mindfulness, decentering, and mental health. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1156-1169. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0558-0 Feng, X. J., Kr鋑eloh, Ch. U., Medvedev, O. N., Billington, D. R., Jang, J. Y., & Siegert, R. J. (2016). Assessing mechanisms of mindfulness: Improving the precision of the nonattachment scale using a rasch model. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1082-1091. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0546-4 Gambrel, L. E., Faas, C., Kaestle, C. E., & Savla, J. (2016). Interpersonal Neurobiology and Couple Relationship Quality: A Longitudinal Model. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(3), 272-283. DOI: 10.1007/s10591-016-9381-y Goodall, K., Trejnowska, A. & Darling, S. (2012). The relationship between dispositional mindfulness, attachment security and emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 622-626. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.008 Hertz, R. M., Laurent, H. K. & Laurent, S. M. (2015). Attachment mediates effects of trait mindfulness on stress responses to conflict. Mindfulness, 6(3), 483-489. Johnson, D.C. & Johnson, L.B. (2010). Reinventing the stress concept. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 12(3), 218-231. DOI: 10.1891/1559-4343.12.3.218 Lamis, D. A. & Dvorak, R. D. (2014). Mindfulness, nonattachment, and suicide rumination in college students: The mediating role of depressive symptoms. Mindfulness, 5(5), 487-496. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-013-0203-0 Leigh, J., & Anderson, V.N. (2013). Secure attachment and autonomy orientation may foster mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 14 (2), 265-283. DOI: 10.1080/14639947.2013.832082 Luk, J., Holman, G., & Kohlenberg, R. (2008). Contextual variations of mindfulness across interpersonal and task-oriented contexts: The roles of gender and ethnicity. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 13(4), 184-190. Macaulay, C. B., Watt, M. C., MacLean, K., & Weaver, A. (2015). Mindfulness mediates associations between attachment and anxiety sensitivity. Mindfulness, 6(6), 1263-1270. Maslyn, J. M., Schyns, B. & Farmer, S. M. (2017). Attachment style and leader-member exchange: The role of effort to build high quality relationships [Abstrakt]. Leadership and organization development journal., 38(3), 450-462. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-01-2016-0023 McDonald, H. M., Sherman, K. A., Petocz, P., Kangas, M., Grant, K. A. & Kasparian, N. A. (2016). Mindfulness and the experience of psychological distress: The mediating effects of emotion regulation and attachment anxiety. Mindfulness, 7(4), 799-808. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0517-9 Melen, S., Pepping, C. A. & O扗onovan, A. (2017). Social foundations of mindfulness: Priming attachment anxiety reduces emotion regulation and mindful attention. Mindfulness, 8(1), 136-143. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0587-8 Mikl髎i, M., Szab M. & Simon, L. (2017). The role of mindfulness in the relationship between perceived parenting, early maladaptive schemata and parental sense of competence. Mindfulness, 8, 471-480. DOI: DOI 10.1007/s12671-016-0619-4 Montero-Marin, J., Puebla-Guedea, M., Herrera-Mercadal, P.; Cebolla, A.. Soler, J., Demarzo, M., Vazquez, C., Rodr韌uez-Bornaetxea, F., & Garc韆-Campayo, J. (2016). Psychological effects of a 1-month meditation retreat on experienced meditators: The role of non-attachment. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-10. 10p. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01935. Music, G. (2014). The buzz trap: Speeded-up lives, distractedness, impulsiveness and decreasing empath. Psychodynamic Practice, 20(3), 228-249. DOI: 10.1080/14753634.2014.916840. Pepping, C. A., Davis, P.J., & O'Donovan, A. (2013). Individual differences in attachment and dispositional mindfulness: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 453-456. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.006 Pepping, C. A., Davis, P.J., & O'Donovan, A. (2015). The association between state attachment security and state mindfulness. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0116779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116779 Pepping, C. A. & Duvenage, M. (2016). The origins of individual differences in dispositional mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 130-136 DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.027 Pepping, C. A., O'Donovan, A. & Davis, P. J (2014). The differential relationship between mindfulness and attachment in experienced and inexperienced meditators. Mindfulness, 5(4), 392-399. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-012-0193-3 Pickard, J.A., Caputi, P. & Grenyer, B.F.S. (2016). Mindfulness and emotional regulation as sequential mediators in the relationship between attachment security and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 179-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.091 Rowe, A. C., Shepstone, L., Carnelley, K. B., Cavanagh, K. & Millings, A. (2016). Attachment security and self-compassion priming increase the likelihood that first-time engagers in mindfulness meditation will continue with mindfulness training. Mindfulness, 7(3), 642-650. Saavedra, M.C., Rogge, R.D. & Chapman, K.E. (2010). Clarifying links between attachment and relationship quality: Hostile conflict and mindfulness as moderators. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 380-390. DOI: 10.1037/a0019872 Sahdra, B. K., Ciarrochi, J. & Parker, P. (2016). Nonattachment and mindfulness: Related but distinct constructs. Psychological Assessment, 28(7), 819-829. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000264 Sahdra, B. K., MacLean, K. A., Ferrer, E., Shaver, P. R., Rosenberg, E. L., Jacobs, T. L., Zanesco, A. P., King, B. G., Aichele, S. R., Bridwell, D. A., Mangun, G. R., Lavy, S., Wallace, B. A., & Saron, C. D. (2011). Enhanced response inhibition during intensive meditation training predicts improvements in self-reported adaptive socioemotional functioning. Emotion, 11(2), 299-312. DOI: 10.1037/a0022764 Shaver, P. R., Lavy, S., Saron, C. D. & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Social foundations of the capacity for mindfulness: An attachment perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 264-271. DOI: 10.1080/10478400701598389 Snyder, R., Shapiro, S. & Treleaven, D. (2012). Attachment theory and mindfulness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(5), 709-217. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-011-9522-8 Swart, J. (2014). Applying Buddhist principles to mode deactivation theory and practice. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation & Therapy, 9(2), 26-30. Walsh, J. J., Balint, M. G., Smolira, S. J. D. R., Fredericksen, L. K., & Madsen, S. (2009). Predicting individual differences in mindfulness: The role of trait anxiety, attachment anxiety and attentional control. In Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 94-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.008 Ploha 4 – P鴈hled dotazn韐pro m禅enmindfulness P鴈vztato z p鴈dchozvlastnpr醕e (Bla瀍jovsk 2013, s. 112, ploha 5): 刄praveno a 栳ste鑞citov醤o dle Bendy (2007, s. 136). Benda s醡 tabulku p鴈vzal od Cardaciotto (2005). Dotazn韐StrukturaZam龤lenvyu瀒tíOmezenMAAS - 妅醠a v氻mavpozornosti a uv靌omov醤í20 1 faktor, 1 sk髍e 15 polo瀍k, Likertova 歬醠a o 6 bodech - vy殮sk髍e = vy殮m韗a v氻mavosti.M禅celkovou tendenci k tomu b齮 pozorn(attentive) a v靌om(aware) v ptomn閙 okam瀒ku b靐em ka瀌odenn韍o 瀒vota.Nezahrnuje postojovkomponenty, jako nap p鴌jetFIM - Freiburskinvent狲 v氻mavosti4 faktory21 1 souhrnnsk髍e 30 polo瀍k Likertova 歬醠a o 4 bodechM禅neposuzuj韈zaznamen醰醤ptomnosti a otev鴈nosti k negativnzku歟nosti. Ur鑕n pro zku歟nmedituj韈Je navr瀍na pouze pro pou瀒tu zku歟n齝h medituj韈韈h. Pro nemedituj韈slou烅 jejkrat氻 verze22 KIMS - Kentuckinvent狲 schopnostv氻mavosti4 faktory23 1 souhrnnsk髍e 39 polo瀍k Likertova 歬醠a o 5 bodechZobrazuje celkovou tendenci k v氻mavosti v ka瀌odenn韒 瀒voti u osob bez medita鑞zku歟nosti.Nejv韈e odpov韉v氻mavosti, jak je poj韒醤a v r醡ci dialektickterapie chov醤CAMS24 - Kognitivna afektivn歬醠a v氻mavosti4 aspekty v氻mavosti 1 souhrnnsk髍e 12 polo瀍k Likertova 歬醠a o 4 bodechM禅uv靌omov醤si, pozornost, soust鴈d靚na ptomnost a neposuzov醤p鴌jetHodnotpouze zachycenmy歭enek a pocit dal氻 fenom閚y nem禅MQ 4 aspekty v氻mavosti 1 faktor a souhrnnsk髍e 16 polo瀍k, Likertova 歬醠a o 7 bodechM禅4 aspekty: v氻mavpozorov醤 pou歵靚(espond go), neaverzi a nehodnocen Ur鑕na pro medituj韈i nemedituj韈Obsahuje 4 aspekty, av歛k jejstruktura je omezena na 1 faktor.Ploha 5 – Struktura dotazn韐p靦i aspektv氻mavosti (FFMQ) P鴈vztato z p鴈dchozvlastnpr醕e (Bla瀍jovsk 2013, s. 46): 凢FMQ obsahuje 39 polo瀍k a charakterizuje v氻mavost jako koncept s 5 slo瀔ami. Ka瀌aspekt je m禅en na vlastnsub歬醠e – v齭ledkem dotazn韐u je celkovsk髍e v氻mavosti a p靦 sk髍z n醩leduj韈韈h sub歬醠 (巌tn韐, 2010): 妅醠a pozorov醤– t齥se bd靗pozornosti k tomu, co se pr醰odehr醰 vn靔氻m podn靦鵰 (zvuky, barvy, v鵱臁K) i vnit鴑韒 pro瀒tk鵰 (my歭enky, emoce, p鴈dstavy, t靗esnpocity). 刅y殮sk髍e ukazuje na vn韒avost 鑙 otev鴈nost vi sv靦u a ochotu v靚ovat pozornost sv齧 pocit鵰.(巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108). 妅醠a popisov醤– p鴈dstavuje schopnost vyj醖鴌t svpocity, my歭enky nebo p鴈dstavy ve formslov. Vy殮sk髍e ukazuje na lep氻 n醜led na svpocity a orientaci v nich. Ni灇sk髍e ukazuje na pot頌e s ur鑕n韒 a pops醤韒 sv齝h pocitanebo n韟kz醞em o svvnit鴑pro烅v醤 妅醠a v靌om閔o jedn醤– hodnotschopnost b齮 plnpozornk 鑙nnosti, kterou 鑜ov靕 moment醠nd靗– opakem je automatickchov醤 kdy je 鑜ov靕 刣uchem neptomn龘 a myslna jinstarosti, vzpom韓ky atd. M鶠e p鴌 tom v閟t tzv. vnit鴑monolog. 凩ids n韟k齧 sk髍e jsou 鑑sto anga瀘vanv automatick閙 aneurotick閙 jedn醤a bezmy歭enkovitse chovajtak, aby sn頌ili svou 鷝kost.(巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108). 妅醠a nehodnocenintrapsychick齝h pro瀒tk– p鴈dstavuje zaujetnehodnot韈韍o postoje k vlastn韒 my歭enk醡 a pocit鵰. Vy殮sk髍e v t閠o sub歬醠e ukazuje 剆chopnost aktivn韍o p鴌jetintrapsychick齝h pro瀒tk鶕 (巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108), 鑜ov靕 tak dok釣e p鴌j韒at vlastnpro瀒tky a p鴌tom je nehodnotit jako dobr鑙 歱atn pjemn鑙 nepjemn vhodn鑙 nevhodn Sub歬醠a negativnkoreluje se zv龤enou snahou vyhnout se 鑙 potla鑙t svmy歭enky 鑙 emoce. 妅醠a nereagov醤na vyno鴘j韈se pro瀒tky – reprezentuje 剆chopnost nenechat se un閟t 鑙 se zapl閟t do my歭enek a emoc頁 (巌tn韐, 2010, s. 108). Znamento vn韒at svvnit鴑pro瀒tky, emoce, my歭enky, p鴈dstavy s odstupem a nenechat se vt醜nout do sv齝h automatick齝h zp鵶obreagov醤na takov閠o pro瀒tky.“
1 (Ch鰀r鰊, cit. podle Mikulincer a Shaver, 2007, s. 480) 2 Nydahl (2000, s. 13-14) 3 Motto 凞扽ou Know What I Mean?se nach醶v 鷙odu prvnkapitoly knihy Assessing Adult Attachment: A dynamic maturational approach to discourse analysis (Crittenden a Landini, 2011), kterjako jedna z prvn韈h p鴈dstavuje relativnnova v齴namnzp鵶ob uchopenteorie citovvazby v r醡ci tzv. dynamick閔o modelu zr醤(Dynamic Maturational Model). 凞扽ou Know What I Mean?odkazuje z醨oveke stejnojmenn閙u hitu britskskupiny Oasis z roku 1997 z alba Be Here Now. Tato skladba nejen p鴈sno 10 let p鴈dch醶鑑sov閙u 鷖eku v齴kumu analyzovan閔o v t閠o pr醕i (2007-2017), ale nav韈 ve sv閙 ofici醠nklipu zobrazuje mota 刡uzdea 剉韙e, co t韒 mysl韒v 鑕sk閙 jazyce. Jakkoli se tento fakt jevjako klasickprojev synchronicity, dod醰n醡 takprvek narativnmetafory – ko鴈ny pb靐u star閔o 20 let, kterpostupem 鑑su dosp靗 od d鵵azu na 則ea tadyp鴈s teorii citovvazby ak sou鑑sn閙u prolnutt靋hto oblasta pokusu o konstrukci systematick閔o p鴈hledu toho, jaksmysl si z tohoto spojenm鶠eme odn閟t. Tolik k projev鵰 hravosti prostoru, ktertuto pr醕i prov醶ej 4 Tato pr醕i pou烅vanglickterm韓 刴indfulnessm韘to dnes nej鑑st靔氻ho 鑕sk閔o ekvivalentu 剉氻mavost Podrobnod鵹odn靚t閠o skute鑞osti se nach醶na v kapitole Mindfulness nebo v氻mavost – o 鑕skterminologii). 5 Po鑕t publikovan齝h pracodpov韉aj韈韈h kl龛ovkombinaci tematick齝h slov 刴indfulness AND organization鑙nil 55 pro rok 2016 a necel齝h 35 pro rok 2015, cop鴈dstavuje necel4 % (2016) a 3 % (2015) z celkov閔o mno瀞tvpracpublikovan齝h na t閙a mindfulness v dan齝h letech (Web of Science, 2017). 6 Search inside yourself je program pro rozvoj mindfulness vyvinutGooglem, ktervyu烅vtakmno瀞tvjin齝h firem, jejichseznam je k nalezenna http://searchinsideyourself.com.au/ 7 Awareness, attention, remembering 8 凾he awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgementally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment.“ 9 Ve v齥ladu podstaty mindfulness 鑕skjazyk pon靕ud zaost醰za anglick齧. 10 Zv韉av鑤en狲 m鶠e z韘kat p鴈dstavu nap zde: http://praveted.info/jak_prekladat_mindfulness 11 Viz http://www.mindfulnessclub.cz/; http://www.mindfulness-institut.cz/; http://bettermind.cz/; http://mindfulwork.cz/; http://www.mindfullife.cz/ atd. 12 Viz http://www.mbsr.cz/ 13 凾erminologie a mo瀗osti popisu problematiky v氻mavosti jsou v 鑕sk閙 jazyce nedokonala mnohdy vystihujp鵹odnanglickterm韓y nep鴈sn鑙 nedostate鑞 Samotnp鴈klad slova mindfulness do 鑕sk閔o pojmu v氻mavost pova瀠je autorka t閠o pr醕e za nedostate鑞 nebov sobnepoj韒歩rokou 歬醠u v齴nam ktersk齮slovo mindfulness. V 鑕sk閙 jazyce existujpro stejnpojem takv齬azy 剉靌omvn韒醤頁 (Bennett-Goleman, cit. podle Benda a Hor醟, 2008) 鑙 剈v靌omov醤頁 (Pra歬o, Mo瀗 妉epecka kol., cit. podle Benda a Hor醟, 2008). Je tedy pot鴈ba br醫 omezenost 鑕skterminologie v 鷙ahu p鴌 snah醕h v氻mavost popsat, pochopit a aplikovat.(Bla瀍jovsk 2013). 14 www.slovnik-synonym.cz (v歩mnout si); www.synonyma-online.cz (v歩mnout si); http://synonymus.cz/vsimat-si/; 15 Viz na http://journals.sagepub.com/toc/spra/27/2 16 Pro pochopennarativity Drake ilustruje pklad: a鑛oli leader m鶠e vypr醰靦 pb靐y o sv齝h skv靗齝h 鷖p鞖韈h, v pozadm鶠e b齮 jeho fixace na minulud醠osti, ktermu umo烌uje vyhnout se ptomnosti a aktu醠n韒 vztahov齧 pot鴈b醡, a velkstrach z toho, 瀍 by se spol閔al na pomoci druh齝h, ktermu znemo烌uje se posouvat d醠. 17 V p鵹odn韒 v齜靣u se jednalo o 50 studi z nichcelpolovina, 25, byla p鴈hledov齧i studiemi. Kv鵯i omezen閙u prostoru v t閠o pr醕i pak byl tento v齜靣 omezen na 17 p鴈hledov齝h studi 18 Ing. Marek Vich je spolu s Ing. Janem Burianem, Ph.D. autorem 8-t齞enn韍o programu Relational Mindfulness Training (RMT), kterje zam禅en na vyu瀒tmindfulness v r醡ci mezilidsk齝h vztah Viz http://www.mindfulnessclub.cz/o-nas 19 http://www.mindfulnessclub.cz/ 20 萫skn醶vy dle Bendy (2007). 21 Zahrnuje 鑤y鴌 faktory: I. pozornost (attention) k ptomn閙u okam瀒ku; II. nehodnot韈pstup vi soba ostatn韒; III. otev鴈nost k nepjemn齧 zku歟nostem; IV. ch醦醤zku歟nosti na obecn鷕ovni, ne jen z hlediska moment醠n韍o pro瀒tku. Kv鵯i nestabilit4 faktorp鴌 r鵽n齝h administrac韈h auto鴌 doporu鑥jinterpretovat pouze jednotnsouhrnnv齭ledek (Buchheld, Grossman a Walach, 2001). 22 Pozd靔i byla vytvo鴈na 14-ti polo瀔ovvarianta pro nemedituj韈osoby (Walach a kol., cit. podle Baer, Walsh a Lykins, 2008), kterprok醶ala o鑕k醰anrozd韑y mezi skupinami medituj韈韈h, nemedituj韈韈h a klinick齝h pacient Auto鴌 doporu鑥jpou烅vat dlouhou variantu FMI pro vzorek, kterje s v氻mavost鑙 buddhistick齧i koncepty dob鴈 sezn醡en, a kr醫kou verzi pro osoby v t靋hto v靋ech nezku歟n 23 M禅鑤y鴌 faktory v氻mavosti: pozorov醤 popisov醤 zach醶ens uv靌omov醤韒, nehodnot韈akceptaci. 24 Tato 歬醠a byla pozd靔i publikov醤a pod ofici醠n韒 n醶vem Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R; Feldman, Hayes, Kumar, Greeson a Laurenceau, 2006). Baer a kol. (2006) pou瀒li pro anal齴u dotazn韐 CAMS, jehozdrojem byl nepublikovandokument Feldmana a kol. z roku 2004. Yüklə 1,05 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|