Médiagraphie 
MÉDIAGRAPHIE
ANSCOMBRE, J.C et DUCROT, O (1983). L’argumentation dans la langue. Liège : Mardaga.
ARISTOTE (1991). Rhétorique. Traduction de C.E Ruelle et commentaires de B. Timmermans. Paris : Le livre de poche #12, coll. Classiques de la philosophie.
Aznour, H. et Bertrand, D. (2000). Réapprendre à apprendre, Montréal, Guérin universitaire.
BAKER, M. et BIELACZYC, K. (1995). Missed opportunities for learning in collaborative problem-solving interactions in (Éd.) Greer, J., Proceedings of AI-ED 95 – 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 210-218). Charlottesville : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
BAKER, M. (1996). Argumentation and cognitive change in collaborative problem-solving dialogues (Report No. CR-13/96). France : Coast.
BAKER, M. et al. (2001). Computer-mediated epistemic interactions for co-constructing scientific notions: lessons learned. European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (EuroCSCL 2001), Maastricht, 22–24 mars 2001. Maastricht : Unigraphic. 89–96.
Barker, T. et Pilkington, R. (2000). Collaborative Learning in Virtual Learning Environments, CBLU Technical Report.
BARTH, E.M., KRABBE, C.W., (1982). From axiom to dialogue. A philosophical study of logics and argumentation. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
BEREITER, C. et SCARDAMALIA, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum and ass.
BÉRUBÉ B. et CARON-BOUCHARD M. (2001). La dynamique interactive des groupes virtuels. Montréal, Collège Jean-de-Brébeuf.
Biocca, F., (1997). The Cyborg’s Dilemna : Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environment, URL : http://www.ascurc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html#rref90
BLACKBURN, P., (1989). Logique de l’argumentation. Ottawa, Canada. Éditions du Renouveau Pédagogique.
BLAIR, J.A et Johnson, R.H., (1983) Logical self-defense. 2ème éd. Toronto : McGraw Hill Ryerson.
BOREL, M.-J., GRIZE J.-B., MIÉVILLE, D., (1983). Essai de logique naturelle. Bern/Frankfurt/New York : Peter Lang.
BRETON, P. (2001). L’argumentation dans la communication. (nouv.) Éd. La Découverte et Syros : Paris.
BrUner, M., (1999). J. Piaget,
URL : http://www.curriculum.calstatela.edu/faculty/psparks/theorists/501piaget.htm
Bruner, J., (1990). Acts of Meaning, Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
BULL, S. et BROADY, E. (1997). Spontaneous peer tutoring from sharing student models in (Éd.) du Boulay, B. et Mizoguchi, R., Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 143-150). Kobe : IOS Press.
BURNETT, R. E. (1993). Decision-making during the collaborative planning of co-authors in (Éd.) Penrose, A. et Sitko, B., Hearing ourselves think : Cognitive research in the college writing classroom (pp. 125-146). NY : Oxford University Press.
Caron-Bouchard, M. et Maccabée, D. (2000). Enquête auprès des élèves du collégial, Montréal, Collège Jean de-Brébeuf.
CECEZ-KECMANOVIC, D., TRELEAVEN, L. et MOODIE, D. (2000). CMC and the Ques of Democratisation a University Field Study. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaï International Conference on System Sciences 2000.
CEFRIO, NETAdo (2003).
URL : http://www.cefrio.qc.ca/Communiques/commun_45.cfm
CHAN, C. K. K. (1995). Collaborative processing of incompatible information in Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 346-351). Amsterdam : Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chen, I. (1999). Overview of Lev Vygotsky’s Theory,
URL : http://www.coe.uh.edu/~ichen/ebook/ET-IT/social.htm
Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Education Research, 1964(1).
Coppola, N., Rana, A. et Bieber, M. (1997). Collaborative Hypermedia Educational Framework (CHEF) : Instantiation and Assessment of an Instructional Model,
URL : http://www.ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw99_archive/aw99/proceedings/Bieber/index.html
Costigan, J. T. (1997). Comparison of Video, Avatar & Face-to-Face in Collaborative Virtual Learning Environment, URL : http://www.evl.uic.edu/costigan/thesis.html
CRUZ, M. G., DRYDEN HENNINGSEN, D. Z. et SMITH, B. A. (1999). The Impact of directive leadership on group information sampling decisions, and perceptions of the Leader in Communication research, vol 26 n.3, Sage Publications.
DISPAUX, G., (1984). La logique et le quotidien. Une analyse dialogique des mécanismes d’argumentation. Paris : Les éditions de Minuit, coll. Arguments.
EEMEREN, F.H. van., (1995). A world of difference: the rich state of argumentation theory. Informal Logic Vol 17, No 2: 159-176.
EEMEREN, F.H. van., GROOTENDORST, R,. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht, Hollande: Foris Publication, coll, Pragmatics and discourse analysis #1.
ENQUÊTE CEFRIO (2003).
URL: http://www.netado.enquetecefrio2003
Esch, E. (1998). Environnement virtuel et réalités sociolinguistiques, Insa de Lyon.
URL : http://www.insa-lyon.fr/Departements/CDRL/environnement.html
ESCH, E. et CLEARY, R. L. (1999). Learner Interaction and Broadband Network in (Éd.) Hogan-Brun, G. et Jung, U., Media Multimedia Omnimedia, Peter Lang.
ERKENS, G. (1997). Co-operative problem solving with computers in education : Modelling of co-operative dialogues for the design of intelligent educational systems. Utrecht, Pays-Bas : Brouwer Uithof.
Gérin-Lajoie, D. et Wilson, D. (1999). Technologie et facilitation de l’apprentissage,
URL: http://www.olt-bta.hrde-drhc.gc.ca/download/89029final_f.pdf
Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative Learning and Enhances Critical Thinking in Journal of Technology Education, volume 7, number 1, Fall 1995.
URL : http://www.borg.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/jee-v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html
GREENO, J. G. (1997). Response : On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Researcher, 20 (1), pp. 5-17.
Grégoire, R., Bracewell, R. et Laferrière, T. (1996). L’apport des nouvelles technologie de l’information et de la communication (NTIC) à l’apprentissage des élèves du primaire et du secondaire.
URL : http://www.fse.ulaval/fac/tact/fr/html/apport/apport96.htm
Grize, J.-B. (1982). De la logique à l’argumentation, Genève, Librairie Droz S.A.
Groupe μ (1970). Rhétorique générale, Paris Larousse.
Guéguen, N. et Tobin, L. (Éd) (1998). Communication, société et internet, Actes du colloque Gresico de Vannes, Paris, L’Harmatan, Paris.
Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgf @ Cyberspace?, London and New-York Routledge.
Hartley, J. R. (1999). Effective Pedagogies for Managing Collaborative Learning in On-line Learning Environments in Educational Technology and Society, 2(2).
HENRI, F. et LUNDGREN-CAYROL, K. (2001). Apprentissage collaboratif à distance, PUF.
Hermina, J.M., Erkens, G. et Kanselaar, G. (1999). Developing a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment for Argumentative Writing, URL: http://www.CIP71999.htm
HERRING S. (1999). Interactional Coherence in Journal of Collaborative Mediated Communication, 4(4). URL: http://www.ascuse.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html
Hiltz, S. R. (1992). Constructing and Evaluating a Virtual Classroom in Contexts of Computer Mediated Communication, ed. Martin Lea.
URL: http://www.tecfa.unige.ch/~jermann/staf17/hiltz.html
Hiltz, S. R. (1998). Collaborative Learning in Asynchronous Learning Network: Building Learning Communities, URL : http://www.eies.njit.edu/~hiltz
Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N. et al. (1999). Measuring the Importance of Collaborative Learning for the Effectiveness of ALN : A Multi-Measure, Multi-Method Approach,
URL : http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol4issue2.htm
HOOGAERT, C., (1996). Argumentation et questionnement. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, coll. L’interrogation philosophique.
IFERT, D. et ROLOFF, M. E. (1998). Understanding obstacles preventing compliance in Communication research vol.25 n.2, Sage Publication.
JACKSON, S., et JACOBS, S., (1981). The collaborative production of proposals in conversational argument and persuasion: A study of disagreement regulation, Journal of the American forensic association 18: 77-80.
JOHNSON, D. W. et JOHNSON, R. T. (1993). Creative and critical thinking through academic controversy, American Behavioural Scientist, 37 (1), pp. 40-53.
Jones, S. (1999). Doing Internet Research : Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower, London - New-York, Routlegde.
Kohn, R.C. et nègre, P. (1991). Les voies de l’observation, Paris: Nathan.
KOPPERSCMIDT, J. (1989). Methodik der argumentationsanalyse. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
KUHN, D., SHAW, V. et FELTON, M. (1997). Effects on dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning, Cognition and Instruction 15 (3), pp. 287-315.
LAJOIE, J. et GUICHARD, É. (2002). Odyssée Internet. Enjeux sociaux. Montréal PUF.
LEE, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning : acquiring cultural knowledge via on-line newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chatrooms. Calico Journal, vol. 16, no 2.
LEGENDRE, A. (1993). Dictionnaire actuel de l’éducation, Montréal, Guérin.
Mabry, E.A. (1997). Framing Flames : The Structure of Argumentative Message on the Net,
URL : http://www.ascusc.org/jcnc/vol2/issue4/mabry.html
MEQ (1996). Les technologies de l’information et de la communication en éducation, Plan d’intervention. URL: http://www.meq.gouv.qc.ca/m_ped-ens-sup.htm
MERCER, N. et WEGERIF, R. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom, British Educational Research Journal 25 (1), pp. 95-111.
Mucchielli, A. (1996). Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales, Paris, Armand Colin/Masson.
Mucchielli, A. et Juidarch, J. (1998). Nouvelles méthodes d’étude en communication, Paris, Armand Colin/Masson.
PENNINGTON, M. (1996). Writing the natural way : on Computer. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9 (2-3).
PERELMAN, Ch., OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L., (1958). La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
PILKINGTON, R. M. et MALLEN, C. (1996). Dialogue games to support reasoning and reflection in diagnostic tasks in (Éd.) Brna, P., Paiva, A. et Self, J., Proceedings of EuroAIED (pp. 213-220). Lisbonne : Fundaçao Calouste Gulbenkian.
PILKINGTON, R. M. (1999). Analysing Educational Discourse : The DISCOUNT Scheme. CBL Technical Report, no. 99/2. ISBN : 1 901418 022.
PILKINTON, R., TREASURE-JONES, T. et KNESER, C. (1999). The Tutor’s Role : An investigation of participants’ role in CMC seminars using exchange structure analysis in Proceedings of Workshop 3 : Analysing educational dialogue interaction : Towards models that support learning (pp.44-52). Le Mans, France : AI & Education ’99.
PILKINGTON, R. et WALKER, A. (2002). Using CMC to Develop Argumentation Skills in Children with “Literacy Deficit” sous presse
Pfister, H.-R. et al. (1999). Negotiating about Shared Knowledge in a Cooperative Learning Environment, URL:
http://www.sll.stanford.edu/CSCL99/papers/Monday/pfisterwessnerS93.html
Poupart et al. (1997). La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques, Montréal, Gaétan Morin.
Powers, S. et Mitchell, J. (1997). Student Perceptions and Performances in a Virtual Classroom Environments, Proceedings : American Education Research Association (AERA), Chicago, Illinois, March.
PULLEN, J. M. (1998). Synchronous distance education and the Internet, URL: http://www.isoc.org/inet98/proceeding/4b/4b_1.htm
RANKIN, W. (1997). Increasing the Communicative Competence of foreign language students through the FL Chatroom in Foreign language annals, v.30 n.4, winter 1997.
REBOUL, O. (1986). La rhétorique. Paris : PUF.
REBOUL, O. (1991). Introduction à la rhétorique. Paris : PUF, Coll. Premier cycle.
salomon, G. (1993). Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, Cambridge CUP.
SALOMON, G. et al. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational researcher, 20 (4).
SAVERY, J. et DUFFY, T. M. (1996). Problem based learning : An instructional model and its constructivist framework in (Éd.) Wilson, B. Constructivist learning environments : Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Educational Technology Publications.
Sherman, L.W. (1999). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) in Higher Education: A Postmodern Constructivist Pedagogy for Teaching Educational Psychology Cooperatively, URL:
http://www.muohio.edu/%7Eshermanw/aera99_wholepaper.htmlx
Smith, R., Sipusic, M. J. et al. (1999). Experiments Comparing Face-to-Face with Virtual Collaborative Learning in Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), 1999 Conference, C. Hoadly & J. Roschell (eds), Palo Alto.
STAHL, G. (2002). Contributions to a theorical Framework for CSCL, URL:
http://orgwis.gmd.de/~gerry/publications/conferences/2002/escl2002/index.html
STEIN, N. L., CALICCHIA, D. J. et BERNAS, R. S. (1996). Conflict talk : Understanding and resolving arguments in (Éd.) Givon, T. Typological studies in language : Conversational analysis (pp. 233-267). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
SULLIVAN, N. et PRATT, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments : a computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 24 (4), pp. 491-501.
TAM, M. (2000). Constructivism, Instructional Design and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning in Education Technology and Society, 3(2).
TOULMIN, S., (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toussaint, N. et Ducasse, G. (1996). Apprendre à argumenter, Sainte-Foy, Les Éditions Le Griffon d’argile.
Tremblay, R. et Lacroix, J. G. (1996). Apprentissage philosophique en réseau informatique la recherche APRI : abrégé des résultats qualitatifs. URL : http://infopuq.uquebec.ca/~qc13253/acte 1996/acte96_23htm
VALLERAND, R. J. (1994). Les fondements de la psychologie sociale. Montréal : Gaétan Morin éditeur.
VAN EEMEREN, F., GROOTENDORST, R. et SNOECK HENKEMANS, A. F. (1995). Argumentation. Groningen, Pays-Bas : Woltersgroep.
VEERMAN, A. L. (1996). Argumentation during solving ill-structured problems. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Argumentative Text Processing. Barcelone.
VEERMAN, A. L. et ANDRIESSEN, J. E. B. (1997). Academic learning and writing through the use of educational technology. Paper presented at the conference on Learning and Teaching Argumentation, Middlesex, Londres.
Veerman, A.L. et al. (1999). Collaborative Learning Through Computer Mediated Argumentation in Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), 1999 Conference, Palo Alto CA, C. Hoadly & J. Roschelle (eds).
VEERMAN, A. L. (2000). Computer-Supported Collaborative learning through argumentation. Thesis : Print Partners Ipskamp, Enschede.
VignauX, G. (1976). L’argumentation. Essai d’une logique discursive. Genève-Paris : Droz.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society : The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachussetts : Harvard University Press.
WALKER, S. A., et PILKINGTON, R. M. (2000). Networked communication and the collaborative development of written expression at key stage three. In M. Asensio, J. Foster, V. Hodgson, & M. McConnell (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Networked Learning 2000, Lancaster 17th-19th April. (28-37): Lancaster University and Sheffield University.
WALKER, S. A. et PILKINGTON, R. M. (2001). Facilitating computer-mediated discussion classes: a study of teacher intervention strategies. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2001), Madison, USA. 6-8th August.
WALLACE, P. (1999). The Psychology of Internet, Cambridge University press.
WARSHAUER, M. (1996). Comparing Face-to-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom in CALICO Journal 13 (2): 7-26.
WARSHAUER, M. (1999). Electronic Literacies. Mahwah : New Jersey, Erlbaum.
Wasson, B. et Morch, A. (2000). Identifying Collaboration Pattern in Collaborative Telelearning Scenarios in Educational Technology and Society, 3(3).
WEINBERG, B. in Philip P. WIENER, Dictionary of the History of Ideas. Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas, New York, Charles Scribner’s sons, 1973, vol. IV, pp.167-173.
WOODS, J., WALTON, D.N., (1992). Critique de l’argumentation. Logiques des sophismes ordinaires. Paris : Éditions Kimé.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
