Army 8. Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions
Yüklə 0,91 Mb.
|
|
The networking timeframe issue is currently being addressed via common wiring harnesses and secure Wi-Fi networking systems. The former approach will still take more time than desired to install/strike, while the latter may come up against future bandwidth limitations and security issues despite the best countermeasures since the WiFi signal can travel through the structure gaps to the surrounding environment. In 2011, a concept was developed whereby digital information could be transferred to workstation receivers and linked to a network though the modulation of light transmitted by a slightly modified LED lighting system. Think of this as a fiber optics system without the fiber cable. A portion of the LED light wavelength produced by the bulb is modulated at frequencies beyond human perception and the workstation receiver picks up the signal and transfers it to the user’s computer system. A system of this type is projected to deliver far higher data volume than current Wi-Fi and be totally secure since the light signal cannot pass through structure boundaries such as tent fabric or composite walls. The characteristic of the technology only being useful in confined spaces makes it ideal for our proposed application. It has the added capability of reducing power consumption and since it’s installed with the shelter lighting system will save precious set-up and strike times. Other downstream candidates for this technology would be any self-contained computerized multiuser workstation network which would have a signal uplink to the outside world, such as remote outposts, ships and ultimately new construction office/manufacturing networks. The desired outcome of this project is the construction of a Local Area Network capable of handling 50 workstations in a combined area of 2,500 ft2 while exceeding IEEE 802.11ac and 802.11n theoretical maximum data transfer rates. System must sustain an operationally concurrent minimum throughput of 40% maximum rated network transfer speed. Classified and Un-Classified data transmission within a user workstation lateral span of 3 feet or less is required for fielding purposes. The system objective is to function on the framework of current 120 VAC 60 Hz power supply and shelter LED lighting harnesses using adapted LED circuitry. PHASE I: Awardee shall design a viable and robust LED driven multi-channel, multi-user voice/data/video network configuration to integrate with US military network with the Phase 1 objective of demonstrating the technology. The desired outcomes of this phase are:
Additionally, the awardee shall deliver the following: • Within first two reports, present market research of all existing and future market opportunities outside of DoD applications. • Projected cost per unit of system capable of meeting Phase II performance objectives. • Interfacing plan, e.g. ensuring interoperability with existing military functions… • Network schematics • A list of maintenance items, frequency of replacing such items, and specific training required. • A cost analysis of the systems life cycle, including the cost of maintenance items and consumables, as well as the initial capital cost of procuring the system – over 5 years. This Phase I SBIR is not projected to perform work of a DoD Classified nature. All work performed during Phase I is for technology proof of concept and performance evaluations. PHASE II: Phase II shall result in a delivery of physical hardware capable of demonstrating the concept in a field environment. In this project, the delivered product shall be installed for testing in a Base Camp Integration Lab modeled on current US Army standard for a Combat Outpost. The awardee shall refine the Phase I concept to withstand military environmental conditions and expeditionary power generation constraints where power supply is provided by Tactical Quiet Generators. The awardee shall also configure the technology to be easily harnessed into existing military grade LED lighting fixtures (Techshot Batlite NSN 6210-01-644-1007) such that the technology becomes integrated into the common lighting harness system. The awardee shall optimize signal stability in multi-user workstation download and upload operational conditions. Produce a functional system prototype for testing to include integration with current military qualified digital information modem transmission devices. The objective of the Phase II effort is to provide a Li-Fi based Local Area Network Capability to a 50 workstation shelter complex with a combined area of 2,500 ft2, with an objective of 40 Gbps and a threshold of 25 Gbps sustainable data transfer rates. System shall be operational in interior shelters temperatures than can range from 400F – 1200F. System shall have the ability to sustain concurrent Classified and Un-Classified voice, data and video transfer systems without crossover and at workstation lateral spacing of 3 ft. System shall also be operational during night light discipline operations. System is required to be stable enough to withstand human traffic daylight penetration into the test shelter which shall be configured with a vestibule and tent flap. Each complete Li-Fi unit shall have a total system weight of less than 120 lbs, including packaging, in a man-transportable configuration. One prototype system shall be delivered at the end of Year One (12 months) with a subsequent one (1) month testing period. After this period, design changes shall be communicated to the contractor for development a 2nd generation prototype for a one (1) month evaluation at the end of month 23. System shall be fully functional to allow for performance validation and testing. Testing is projected to be performed at CERDEC facility in Aberdeen, MD. • Technical Data Package to include source code and hardware architecture for Limited Government Use.
During Phase II SBIR, it is possible that there will be some degree of exposure to existing Classified data communications network infrastructure. As such, candidates must be prepared to conform to and execute the standards enumerated by the DoD Defense Security Service. (See http://www.dss.mil/is/niss.html for more information.) PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: The focus of Phase I and Phase II of this program is to develop the technology to replace existing military hardwired and WiFi data networking systems and to provide multi-user network information capability in two distinct and secure data flows in a military expeditionary environment which can then integrate with standard military data transmission devices. This system shall be able to provide data communications and interior lighting system without the need for additional wiring systems, thus reducing transport weight, cube, system set-up and strike times while reducing energy consumption of the lighting and information transfer systems. Commercialization of this technology is projected to be of use in new build office, factory, shipboard, airline and other dimensionally bounded environments. Other applications are anticipated to be found in disaster relief communications networks as well as underground communication networks where traditional wireless networks do not function. REFERENCES: 1. Science Alert - “Li-Fi Has Just Been Tested in The Real World, And It’s 100 Times Faster Than Wi-Fi” 24 Nov 2015 2. Futurism – “Researchers Just Unveiled a New Li-Fi System That’s 100 Times Faster Than Wi-Fi” 21 Mar 2017 3. “What is Li-Fi?” http://purelifi.com/ 4. “Voice and Data Communication Using Li-Fi” Kikshop and Sowyma, International Journal of Advanced Computational Engineering and Networking, Oct 2016, http://www.iraj.in/journal/journal_file/journal_pdf/3-303-147850370944-48.pdf 5. “Evolution of Gi-Fi and Li-Fi in Wireless Networks” Nikhal, Sowbhagya and Krishna, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, May 2016, http://www.ijcseonline.org/spl_pub_paper/31-N048-IJCSE.pdf
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Electronics OBJECTIVE: This effort intended to enhance protection of SUAS, allowing users to fly systems in enclosed spaces and near obstacles while minimizing risk of damage. Improving system protection during SUAS operations will minimize replacement cost of the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) assets and downtime caused by loss of assets, and will maximize user confidence in unknown terrain and mission completion. DESCRIPTION: With the introduction of SUAS operational concepts, Soldiers are now able to remotely maintain eyes on target and remain out of harm’s way. This capability is very valuable and effective in large open areas, but is significantly less effective in enclosed spaces due to risk of collision. There are ongoing efforts to develop collision avoidance capability of stationary objects through the introduction of additional software and sensors. This approach requires that the SUAS be capable of supporting the weight of additional sensors, or the additional power that software requires to function properly. In addition to the collision avoidance approach, there are also commercially available devices that can be attached to an SUAS that will allow collision events to occur without damage. Unfortunately, these physical protection devices tend to be designed for specific SUAS models, have bulky form factors which are difficult to store in a rucksack, and/or present too large of a weight for certain SUAS to carry. • Increased fielding of SUAS, increased need for that ISR capability indoors and in enclosed spaces, and the new focus on urban and megacity warfare dictate the need for a rapidly deployable SUAS protection system. Considerations that require exploration are the ability to provide protection to an unprotected SUAS rapidly, without additional tools and/or significant time and energy costs. A Soldier requiring an SUAS indoors will most likely need to unpack and connect to the SUAS quickly in the field, and in turn would need to rapidly stow the device in a rucksack or pocket quickly in order to keep hands free and react to contact. In the field, additional tools will not be available and various types of SUAS may be in use. • Therefore, the primary focus of this effort should be on the design and development of a system to rapidly provide protection to SUAS while adhering to the requirements as specified below. • The technology should have the following performance requirements: o System Protection: System must prevent damage to SUAS in collisions up to speeds of at least 5 knots (Threshold) and up to 10 knots (Objective). o Interface Compatibility: System must be compatible with all military fielded SUAS. o Installation Time: A trained user must be able to install the system on a given SUAS within 30 seconds (Threshold) (15 seconds Objective) o System Weight: 30 grams (Threshold). 15 grams (Objective). System weight includes power source (if powered) and all ancillary equipment. o Power Requirements (If Powered) • Interface: System must accept power from standard military batteries. • Duration: Operational Runtime must be at least 4 hours (Threshold) and up to 8 hours (Objective). PHASE I: Research, develop and propose a design concept with the potential of realizing the goals in the description above. Describe and quantify how the proposed solution offers enhancement(s) over current technology approaches and/or how it augments other strategies/technologies. Conduct necessary investigation and breadboarding on the design and performance of the components to demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of the proposed system design, minimizing user input. Deliver monthly progress reports and a final report documenting the research and development efforts, identifying any technical challenges that may cause a performance parameter(s) not to be met, results of any modeling, safety issues, and estimated production costs. PHASE II: Develop the technology identified in Phase I. Fabricate and demonstrate one prototype to be demonstrated with government furnished SUAS. The prototype must be capable of demonstrating the performance goals stated in the description above in the relevant environments. Unit cost target for final product must not exceed $1000. Deliverables include any prototypes, detail drawings and source code developed throughout effort. Deliver monthly progress reports and a final report documenting the design specifications, performance characterization and any recommendations for future development. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: A device meeting the performance requirements outlined in this effort would be applicable to military, industrial, and recreational user groups. Those who operate multiple in enclosed spaces, or in close proximity to obstacles would benefit from the significant reduction of risk of damage to the SUAS. Infrastructure Maintenance Personnel and Forestry Surveyors would be able to remotely inspect tunnels and trees respectively at very close ranges without fear of causing damage to expensive equipment. REFERENCES: 1. Brigham Young University; BYU Scolars Archive; 2012-08-07; Development of Sense and Avoid System for Small Unmanned Aerial System http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4760&context=etd NOTE: Information included in Chapters 3 and 4 are of most use for collision avoidance development. 2. Army Short-Range SUAS Salient System Requirements http://www3.natick.army.mil/docs/SUAS/Attachment6_Short_Salient.pdf - To be used to define current Army requirements for SUAS. Selection of fielded SUAS will occur in early FY18. 3. AeroVironment Snipe. To be used as order-of-magnitude sizing http://www.avinc.com/uas/view/snipe KEYWORDS: SUAS, Rapidly Deployable, Protection, Lightweight
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Air Platform OBJECTIVE: This effort intends to enhance the ability for small units to recover, charge, and relaunch SUAS with minimal significant user input. Improving these aspects of SUAS operations will minimize time and effort spent preparing and recovering the SUAS, and allow the soldier to maximize focus on the surrounding area DESCRIPTION: With the introduction of SUAS operational concepts, Soldiers are now able to remotely maintain eyes on target and remain out of harm’s way. Due to a finite power supply, however, SUAS are limited to short flight times before they must be returned to the user, recovered by the user, recharged at a charging station, and relaunched. Additionally, current SUAS that are used by soldiers are not paired with launchers, and require the soldier to manually launch the SUAS when flown. These tasks prevent continuous monitoring of the target, and require additional effort that are a significant distraction from the mission. As a way to provide continuous target coverage, it is possible to use multiple SUAS with overlapped flight times that will allow time for each UAS to charge and return to the target. While this solution addresses the issue of constant coverage, it increases the burden on the user to recover and prepare each SUAS to relaunch. In addition, there is increased interest in SUAS “swarming” capabilities, which allow several SUAS to work together simultaneously to complete tasks that are beyond the capabilities of each individual system. As this capability develops, the management of large numbers of SUAS “swarms” will likely not be feasible with current equipment. With increased fielding of SUAS, and increased number of scenarios that require the use of multiple systems, there is an increased need for a technology that is capable of reducing the physical and cognitive burden of recovery, recharge, and relaunch activities from the Soldier. Therefore, the primary focus of this effort should be on the design and development of a system to reduce the burden of these actions while adhering to the power, size, and weight requirements as specified below. Concept of Operations Description: The CONOPS intended for this system surround a small unit of dismounted soldiers that are tasked with maintaining eyes on target with at least two SUAS units, designated SUAS-A and SUAS-B. The system is intended to launch SUAS-A, while maintaining charge on SUAS-B. As SUAS-A reaches low power state, the system should launch SUAS-B as SUAS-A automatically returns to base and lands on or near the recovery system. The system should then be able to recover, charge and relaunch SUAS-A by the time SUAS-B reaches its low power state. Charging duration of SUAS must be less than the flight time of the SUAS, which differs between each fielded SUAS. CONOP can be scaled to the number of SUAS units carried by the dismounted unit, and developed system must be able to function similarly with a minimum of four (4) SUAS in any given mission. The technology should have the following performance requirements: o System Weight: 10lbs (Threshold). 5lbs (Objective). System weight includes power source and all ancillary equipment. System weight does not include weight of SUAS o System Volume: 3ft3 (Threshold); 1ft3 (Objective). System volume includes power source and all ancillary equipment. System volume does not include volume of SUAS o Power Requirements Interface: System must accept power from standard military batteries. Duration: Operational Runtime must be at least 4 hours (Threshold) and up to 8 hours (Objective). o Interface Compatibility: System must be compatible with military fielded SUAS. This could include direct compatibility with SUAS and its charging interfaces, or just compatibility with the charging units included with each fielded SUAS. o Recovery Range: System must be capable of recovering SUAS within a range of 20 feet of launch point. SUAS recovery is defined as collecting the SUAS from its landing location and connecting it to the charging dock for charging. PHASE I: Research, develop and propose a design concept with the potential of realizing the goals in the description above. Describe and quantify how the proposed solution offers enhancement(s) over current technology approaches and/or how it augments other strategies/technologies. Conduct necessary investigation and breadboarding on the design and performance of the components to demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of the proposed system design, minimizing user input. Deliver monthly progress reports and a final report documenting the research and development efforts, identifying any technical challenges that may cause a performance parameter(s) not to be met, results of any modeling, safety issues, and estimated production costs. All drawing and code developed during this effort are to be included in the final report. PHASE II: Develop the technology identified in Phase I. Fabricate, demonstrate and deliver one prototype (including SUAS recovery and relaunch device and any ancillary devices, with the exception of standard military batteries). The prototype must be capable of demonstrating the performance goals stated in the description above in the relevant environments, in addition to weather hardening and increased portability of system. For the proposal, bidders can prepare their estimates based on the Army providing two of the selected systems for test and demonstration purposes. Selection process for Army fielded SUAS is scheduled for early FY18. Additionally, the unit cost after development must not exceed $15,000. Deliver monthly progress reports and a final report documenting the design specifications, performance characterization and any recommendations for future development. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: A device meeting the performance requirements outlined in this effort would be applicable to military, industrial, and recreational user groups. Those who operate multiple SUAS simultaneously would realize significant reduction of effort and increased time on task benefits. Detection and Response Personnel would be able to increase coverage of a protected area while maintaining focus on operation of SUAS. REFERENCES: 1. AV Snipe Description http://www.avinc.com/uas/view/snipe 2. Department of Defense; Release No. NR-008-17; Department of Defense Announces Successful Micro-Drone Demonstrations; 9 Jan 2017. Swarming Demonstration https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/1044811/department-of-defense-announces-successful-micro-drone-demonstration/ 3. Army Short-Range SUAS Salient System Requirements http://www3.natick.army.mil/docs/SUAS/Attachment6_Short_Salient.pdf
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Weapons OBJECTIVE: Develop an innovative technology and/or process that will provide legible and robust marking on various hand grenade bodies (shapes and materials), with initial focus on XM111 DESCRIPTION: The body of the XM111 Offensive Hand Grenade has a unique shape and designated material (Noryl N190X), which makes the body challenging to mark with legible and robust marking. Currently, the XM111 is in development and the current developmental marking method is through manual pad printing application which is a slow, inconsistent method requiring post process steps to clean overspray and smudges. Pad printing also does not result in a durable and robust solution for lifecycle use. Market research on currently available methods has not identified any existing method that would meet all requirements of the XM111. Therefore, a new and innovative process/product is needed that will meet legibility and durability requirements of the XM111; and reduce or eliminate the preparation required prior to marking the bodies (e.g. necessary pretreatment and cleaning), post processing, and inconsistent legibility of text. Additionally, the new technology/process shall not require complex automation or equipment so as to keep capital investment and follow-on production costs low, and shall be compatible with marking explosively loaded items (i.e. shall not require high heat). Markings are expected to remain legible for at least 20 years while experiencing a storage temperature range of -65 deg F to 165 deg F. Assuming success, the technology/process may also be applied to other grenade munitions to include the M82 and L96/97. PHASE I: Study various printing/marking technologies and processes that will meet product requirements, resulting in a recommendation of final technology/process(es). Representative samples of the grenade body (inert) will be subject to the new technology/process and tested per standard evaluation techniques, to include acetone and spackle knife tests. A final report will document results of the testing as well as process parameters such as pre and post processing requirements, equipment and supplies/materials required, expected throughput, and overall cost. Phase I option will include delivery of the initial System Requirement Specification (SRS) which will annotate technical requirements and verification methods. The SRS shall be approved by the government. Yüklə 0,91 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|