Army 8. Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions
Yüklə 0,91 Mb.
|
|
PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: In the final Phase of the project, the contractor shall determine the capabilities for process control and the development of a strategy for qualification. Additionally, the contractor shall integrate and test the solution on several production parts and demonstrate a path to commercialization and certification. Since this is the development of a new additive manufacturing process, the technology should easily transition to other Federal Agency and Private Industry. Military applications include aluminum transfer cases and titanium hatches for Navy ships. Commercial applications are widespread and include produces such as titanium suspension components for the automotive industry and aluminum seat frames for the aerospace industry. REFERENCES: 1. Shea, R., Santos, N., Appleton, R., “Additive Manufacturing in the DoD - Employing a Business Case Analysis”, Troika Solutions, LLC, November 16, 2015. 2. Sanders, L., “Implications of Additive Manufacturing Deployed at the Tactical Edge”, Defense Acquisition University Aberdeen Proving Ground United States, 15 Apr 2015. http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=AD1016539 3. Zimmerman, B, Allen, E., "Analysis of the Potential Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Army Logistics”, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey Ca, Dec 2013. http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA620821 4. Hormozi, A. M. “Means of transportation in the next generation of supply chains”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 2013, 78(1), 42–49. KEYWORDS: Additive Manufacturing, Multi-Materials, 3D Printing, Metallic Alloys, Portable, Joining, Scalable, Near-Net-Shape
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Electronics, Ground/Sea Vehicles OBJECTIVE: Develop a Modular, Open Architecture, Open Source, Integrated, and Validated Mobility Prediction Capability that is suitable for on-and off-road trafficability assessment for commercial and military vehicles DESCRIPTION: Currently, the NATO Reference Mobility Model (NRMM) is the only NATO recognized numerical modeling tool for assessing mobility objectives, but it is also broadly understood to be theoretically limited and difficult to adapt to contemporary vehicle design technologies and to implement within modern vehicle dynamic simulations. The proposed capability will abstract and expand the basis for the legacy NRMM to define the Next Generation NRMM (NG-NRMM) to be any innovative mobility modeling and simulation capability (M&S) that develops and facilitates interoperation with current and evolving M&S capabilities including: geographic information systems (GIS), physics based vehicle dynamics, physics based terramechanics, vehicle intelligence, as well as uncertainty quantification supporting probabilistic M&S. Geographic information systems (GIS): which are critical to building the required terrains needed to support coalition mission planning and operational effectiveness analyses. Properly characterizing terrain is critical to generate accurate, operationally-relevant ground vehicle performance results using the Next-Generation NRMM (NG-NRMM). In order to achieve this, the NG-NRMM must be able to import and aggregate remotely-sensed Geographic Information System (GIS) data and generate terrains that can be analyzed in the NG-NRMM vehicle / terramechanical analysis software. physics based vehicle dynamics are critical to evaluating more accurately the system and sub-system level performance criteria. High fidelity physics based vehicle dynamics is critical to vehicle terrain interaction (VTI). At the same time capturing the accurate soil mechanical properties such as internal friction, cohesion are critical to evaluating soil such as soft soil and for VTI. This is possible with physics based terramechanics modeling. The emergence of intelligent ground vehicles and their dependence upon quantitative analysis of mobility has infused terrain vehicle systems modeling with a new relevance and broader scope than ever before. Mobility metrics and analysis for robotics and VI is a very active and prolific research area and is an essential element of a NG-NRMM from two application perspectives: 1) Inclusion of robotics and VI in mobility metrics and assessments for operational planning, acquisition, and design; 2) Embedding NG-NRMM models and metrics into robots and VI algorithms because they are standards for mobility assessment and decision making. Also Propagation of variabilities of terramechanics input parameters to mobility, such as speed-made-good, are critical for generation of stochastic mobility map With the research and development of the physics behind these capabilities as well as the rapid advancement of technologies such as high performance computing, this proposal of developing open architecture, open source, integrated, verified and validated mobility capability a reality. This capability will also enhance interoperability of ground vehicles used in multi-national missions. PHASE I: During the Phase I effort the contractor shall perform a feasibility study of NG-NRMM being any ground vehicle mobility modeling and simulation architectural framework that is applicable to the full range of vehicle geometric scales and shall able to model, geometric information systems, physics based vehicle dynamics, physics based vehicle–terrain interaction system, intelligent vehicles (autonomy), uncertainty quantification, verification and validation. PHASE II: During the Phase II effort contractor shall develop, demonstrate, and validate an NG-NRMM prototype capable of being any ground vehicle mobility modeling and simulation architectural framework studied in Phase I and shall provide, standard and evolving M&S methods, modular interoperability, portability, future expansion, verification and validation scales, benchmarks appropriate to multiple levels of theoretical, geometric, and numerical model resolution. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: The prototype developed under Phase II shall be fully developed and transitioned to commercialization of NG-NRMM capable M&S toolset with a potential to demonstrate on a Next Gen Combat Vehicle (NGCV) Virtual Prototyping project. Consisting of 55 members from 15 nations from both military and commercial entities in NATO NG-NRMM Research Group, this product has strong dual-use potential, and will be useful not only among defense industry, but also in commercial vehicle development industries. REFERENCES: 1. Gorsich, D., et al., “The Next Generation NATO Reference Mobility Model Development,” Paper No.
2. McCullough, M., Jayakumar, P., Dasch, J., and Gorsich, D., “The Next Generation NATO Reference Mobility Model Development,” Proc. 8th Americas Regional Conference of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Troy, Michigan, September, 2016 3. Dasch, J., and Jayakumar, P., editors, “Next-Generation NATO Reference Mobility Model (NRMM),”
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Ground/Sea Vehicles OBJECTIVE: Develop smart linkage mechanism to unfold 63-foot-long scissor type Bridge with mechanical advantages other than traditional cable-pulley and built-in hydraulic linear cylinder launchers. The expected concept and layout of the design can be adapted to rapid launch and retrieval movement, light in weight and easy interconnection with electrical or hydraulic servo systems for programmable motion profile and control algorithm. DESCRIPTION: This SBIR topic will deliver a novelty design and technology by applying a linkage mechanism to unfold Army Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge (AVLB). Army AVLB is based on a tank chassis, but instead of the tank's gun turret, it is equipped with a bridge launcher integrated into the chassis and mounted on top. When emplaced, the bridge is capable of supporting tracked and wheeled vehicles with a military load bearing capacity up to Class 85. The bridge can be retrieved from either end. During deployments, bridge emplacement can be accomplished in 2 minutes, and retrieval can be accomplished in 10 minutes under armor protection. There are two types of launcher mechanisms, built-in hydraulic cylinder and cable-pulley, for this Army scissoring-type Assault Bridge. Because of this in-bridge hydraulic cylinder, AVLB’s weight is heavy. It also requires regular maintenance to hydraulic lines, while cable-pulley design offers limited motion profile, less stability and lower speed in launch and retrieval. Proposed mechanism should utilize its mechanical advantage and optimization of location of joint of linkage for Military Load Class (MLC) 85 on the bridge. In general, weight reduction to the current in-bridge set of hydraulic cylinder and cable-pulley is approx. 25% (threshold), 50% (objective). The general idea for linkages in that type of application is achievable. However, to integrate linkage assembly with the bridge set in such restricted area could be a challenge, as well as extreme loads at linkage joints and irregular bar contour design. In addition, to interface with a rotary actuator and modular design is also the contest in this project, which could be a breakthrough of linkage application that requires advanced analysis and simulation before launching a prototype and integration with the full-size bridge. PHASE I: Demonstrate feasibility of algorithm using basic linkage theory to calculate loads at joints for this 30klb-weight bridge, acquire data set comprising either the design intent and a possible motion profile or a statistically robust number of concepts and, registry of measurement accuracy by comparing the results to analysis conducted. With help of software simulation, it is towards a modeling and algorithm to perform a design and load optimization based on the analysis and the data set. PHASE II: Design and build a scaled prototype with hydraulic or electric actuators to validate the concept and design. Delivered prototype must be suitable for testing and validation at an Army facility by technical personnel. Clear operational manuals required but not in military format. During this phase, the Army expects to work closely with the Contractor to clarify mission integration requirements appropriate for the initial prototype maturity. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Final solution is a standardized module for the AVLB bridging system. A launch design works with the Bridge and Tank chassis to meet all the requirements of Army assault bridging. The Army can integrate the technology developed under this SBIR into an end item to answer assault bridge launch requirements. Industry could insert the technology developed under this SBIR in facilities utilizing the latest motion control technology. Further application may be realized for both hydraulic and electric actuators. REFERENCES: 1. DOD Directive 5000.40 - Reliability and Maintainability 2. MIL-STD-785B - Reliability Program for Systems and Equipment, Development and Production 3. MIL-STD-721C - Definitions of Terms for Reliability and Maintainability
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Electronics OBJECTIVE: Develop novel methods and materiel solutions for protecting existing Army radio systems from commonly employed RF radiolocation direction finding systems. Intent is employ techniques that can introduce sufficient spatial uncertainty into target radiolocation systems accuracy as to make their use problematic for the purpose of employing indirect fires against the protected transmitter, while not significantly degrading host radio performance DESCRIPTION: The Army is in the process of deploying tactical wideband networking mobile radio systems to lower echelons of the force, which has led to exposing a larger number of data networking radios to adversarial electronic warfare threats, including radio direction finding (DF). At the same time, the Army is entertaining upgrades to our narrowband voice and data systems deployed at the very lowest echelons. Traditional high-assurance Low Probability to Intercept (LPI) / Low Probability to Detect (LPD) techniques cannot defeat modern digital signal processing receivers, and come at significant cost in terms of operational utility, performance and/or spectral resources. The desired solution at completion will employ novel techniques at the physical layer or higher to introduce sufficient uncertainty into the target radiolocation systems as to make these systems unusable for providing targeting for indirect fire. Low Probability to detect solutions are desirable, but not required. Typically, an RMS position error of 300-500m or greater would be sufficient to render a tactical DF system ineffective for cueing indirect fire. Solutions can encompass current Army radio waveform modifications as well as transmission chain modifications appropriate for installation in Army vehicle platforms. There have been little to no commercially published reports of radio location obfuscation techniques being implemented or tested. Target radio platforms include narrowband VHF (30-80 MHz) radios such as SINCGARS, wideband UHF (225-450 MHz) and L-band (1350-1390, 1755-1850 MHz) radios, including HMS Rifleman, Manpack, and MNVR Radios. Target waveforms include SINCGARS, Wideband Networking Waveform, and Soldier Radio Waveform. Target radiolocation techniques include but are not limited to Time Difference Angle of Arrival (TDOA), Amplitude comparison, and Correlative Interferometry. PHASE I: The Phase One deliverable will be a comprehensive white paper describing:
PHASE II: • Develop and demonstrate a prototype solution for Army radios that employ wideband networking waveforms. • Phase II deliverables will include: o Prototype solution suitable for use with Army vehicle mounted radios o Demonstration of the prototype with existing Army radio systems o Test report detailing solution performance against common threats o Product documentation detailing functions and operations of the prototype Monthly Progress reports. The reports will include all technical challenges, technical risk, and progress against the schedule. o A baseline approach and schedule for Phase III. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: • Develop and demonstrate a radio direction finding obfuscation solution that operates with both current narrowband and wideband tactical radio waveforms, and is suitable for deployment in vehicular, manpack and handheld tactical radios platforms.
REFERENCES: 1. Army Techniques Publication (ATP) 6-02.53 TECHNIQUES FOR TACTICAL RADIO OPERATIONS JAN 2016 http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/ATP.aspx 2. ATP 3-21.21 SBCT INFANTRY BATTALION, FEB 2016 http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/ATP.aspx 3. ATP 3-90.5 COMBINED ARMS BATTALION, FEB 2016 http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/ATP.aspx 4. Analysis of Wireless Geolocation in a Non-Line-of-Sight Environment, Y. Qi, H. Kobayashi and H. Suda, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 5, NO. 3, MARCH 2006 5. A Non-Line-of-Sight Error Mitigation Algorithm in Location Estimation, Pi-Chun Chen, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 1999 WCNC 1999 IEEE 0-7803-5668-3 6. ATP 6-02.603 TECHNIQUES FOR WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL, FEB 2016 http://www.apd.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/ATP.aspx KEYWORDS: VHF Radio, UHF Radio, L-Band Radio, Radiolocation, Electronic Warfare, Electronic Protect, Digital RF, Signal Processing, WIN-T, WNW, SRW, SINCGARS ARMY - Yüklə 0,91 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|