Arthur, W. (2002): The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature, 415: 757-764.
Arthur, W. (2002): The interaction between developmental bias and natural selection: from centipede segments to a general hypothesis. Heredity, 89: 239-246.
Arthur, W., Blackburn, J. (1999): Limited variation in segment number in population of Brachygeophilus truncorum and Geophilus insculptus in Northumberland and Durham. Bulletin of the British Myriapod Group, 15: 9-13.
Arthur, W., Chipman, A.D. (2005): How does arthropod segment number evolve? – some clues from centipedes. Evolution & Development, 7: 600–607.
Arthur, W., Chipman, A.D. (2005): The centipede Strigamia maritima: what it can tell us about the development and evolution of segmentation. BioEssays, 27: 653–660.
Arthur, W., Farrow, M. (1999): The pattern of variation in centipede segment number as an example of developmental contraint in evolution. J. theor. Biol., 200: 183-191.
Arthur, W., Foddai, D., Kettle, Ch. Lewis, J.G.E., Luczynski, M., Minelli, A. (2001): Analysis of segment number and enzyme variation in a centipede reveals a cryptic species, Geophilus easoni sp. nov., and raises questions about speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 74: 489-499. + ERRATUM totéž,76: 163.
