Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore, India 9 April 2011 (Draft) Table of Contents
Yüklə 1,29 Mb.
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- Appendices
Figures
Figure1. Production of research papers by different countries. [Territory size shows the proportion of all scientific papers published in 2001 written by authors living there.] Image © Copyright SASI Group (University of Sheffield) and Mark Newman (University of Michigan). Available at Worldmapper.142 The authors have been granted permission to reproduce this figure under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Source of data used to create map: World Bank's 2005 World Development Indicators. 
Figure 2. Organogram of R&D in India [Source: DST, New Delhi] 
Figure 3. Research under the Central Government [Source: DST, New Delhi] 
Figure 4. Growth of research India's output compared with that of some G8 countries [26] 
Figure 5. Per cent price increase of scientific journals between 1990 and 2008 in different fields 
Figure 6. The cover page of the inaugural issue of Le Journal de Sçavans 
Figure 7. The cover page of the inaugural issue of Philosophical Transactions 
Figure 8. Cover page of an early issue of Asiatick Researches 
Figure 9. Indian open access journals indexed in DOAJ and Open J-Gate 
Figure 10. Growth of repositories in India and the papers deposited in them [Source: ROAR as on 2 April 2011] AppendicesAppendix 1: Science paradigms showing the unity of science 
The map and the following explanatory text were taken from Börner K (2010), Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know,143 The MIT Press,184;144 The map with a different explanatory text appeared in Klavans R & Boyack K W (2008), Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison, Scientometrics, 75(2), 239-250. The map, created using data from SCI and SSCI (Thomson Reuters), appeared originally in Maps of Science.145 Science can be thought of as containing themes and paradigms. Themes are areas of current research, while paradigms comprise the dominant tool sets and existing knowledge that are used by today’s researchers. This map shows 776 major paradigms in science along with the dominant relationships between these paradigms. Paradigms are shown as circles; strong relationships between paradigms are indicated by the lines connecting the circles. The map was created by recursively clustering the 820,000 papers referenced most often in 2003. Clustering at each level was done using VxOrd, a force-directed graph layout routine. These papers formed 53,000 clusters, 6,100 higher-level clusters, and finally 776 paradigms. Although each paradigm contains, on average, 1000 papers, some are larger and some are smaller, as shown by different sized circles on the map. The ring-like structure that formed by scientific paradigms is very robust. We find similar structures for different years, and for maps generated from scientific journals. “The structure of Science”, a galaxy map shown in the first iteration of Places & Spaces, is a map based on clustering of scientific journals, with superimposition of papers on the journal structure, whereas this map was generated directly from highly-cited papers. “The Structure of Science” shows current science in a disciplinary context, while this map shows the breadth of disciplines that contribute to single paradigms. Because of the robust nature of the structure of science paradigms, we have placed our 776 scientific paradigms within a reference system containing 12 radial slices and 6 rings. This allows the position of each paradigm to be codified and available for lookup; for instance Fluid Mechanics paradigms are in grid B3. We have also calculated and displayed the vitality of each paradigm. Vitality is a measure of the speed at which a group of researchers reaches consensus about major improvements. Paradigms are constantly being improved, but it usually takes years to reach consensus about which improvements are major. The white circles represent communities where consensus is reached relatively slowly. This is a common phenomenon in the social sciences, ecological sciences, computer sciences, and mathematics disciplines. The red circles represent communities of researchers where consensus is reached relatively rapidly. This is more common in physics, chemistry, biochemistry and many medical disciplines. Very dark circles (such as those in Astrophysics L5-6) represent communities where consensus is reached extremely quickly. The map of scientific paradigms and its reference system can be used for multiple purposes. Countries, industries, companies, universities, and individual researchers can all locate themselves within the map, either as single points, or as a specific collection of paradigms. Various metrics, such as vitality, can be overlaid on this reference system to highlight specific impacts. Science educations and personal discovery can also be enhanced by linking stories and facts to the map that highlight scientific history, current advances and relationships between scientific paradigms. Appendix 2: Indian open access journals indexed in DOAJ and Open-J-Gate (as on the first week of December 2010)
Yüklə 1,29 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|