Chapter. 1 Introduction

Bibliography

Aarts, J. & Meijs, M. 1984. Corpus Linguistics: Recent Developments in the Use of Computer Corpora in English Language Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi

Abeille, A. Editor. 2000. Building and Using Syntactically Annotated Corpora. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Abney, S. 1989. A Computational Model of Human Parsing. In The Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Vol.8.1. Bell Communications Research: Morristown, NJ.

Abney, S. 1991. Chunks and Dependencies: Bringing Processing Evidence to Bear on Syntax. MS. University of Tubingen.

Abney, S. 1991. Parsing by Chunks. In Berwick, R. Abney, S. Tenny, C. (eds.), Corpus-based Methods in Language and Speech. Dordrecht: Kluwer, page 257-278.

Abney, S. 1996. A Grammar of Projections. MS. University of Tubingen

Abney, S. 1996. Partial Parsing via Finite-State Cascades. John Caroll, ed. ESSLLI Workshop on Robust Parsing. Prague. page 8-15.

Abney, S. 1996. Chunk Stylebook. MS. University of Tubingen.

Khan, A. J. 2006. Urdu/Hindi: An Artificial Divide. Algora Publishing: New York.

Aduriz, I. Aranzabe, M. J. Arriola, J. M. Atutxa, A. Diaz de Ilarraza, A. Garmendia, A. Oronoz, M. 2003. Construction of Basque Dependency Treebank. In: Nivre/Hinrichs 2003, page 201-204.

Afonso, S. Bick, E. Haber, R. Santos, D. 2002. A Treebank for Portuguese. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Las Palmas, Spain, 1698-1703.

Ambati, Bharat Ram, Samar Husain, Joakim Nivre & Rajeev Sangal. 2010. On the Role of Morphosyntactic Features in Hindi Dependency Parsing. MS. Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT-Hyderabad, India & Department of Linguistics and Philology, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Ambati, Bharat Ram, Pujitha Gade, Chaitanya GSK & Samar Husain. 2009. Effect of Minimal Semantics on Dependency Parsing. MS. LTRC, IIIT-Hyderabad.

Arppe Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel. 2010 Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five Points of Debate on Current Theory and Methodology. Corpora Vol. 5.1:1-27. Edinburgh University Press

Atkins, Sue, Jeremy Clear & Nicholas Ostler. 1991. Corpus Design Criteria. Literary & Linguistic Computing 7:1-16.

Backer, P. et al., 2000. Corpus Linguistics and South Asian Languages: Corpus Creation and Tool Development. Literary and Linguistic Computing. Vol 19 (4). Page 509-524

Baerman, Matthew & Brown, D. 2013. Case Syncretism. World Atlas of Language Structures, Eds. Bernard Comrie, Matthew Dryer, David Gil and Martin Haspelmath. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.

Bamman, D. & Crane, G. 2006. The Design and Use of a Latin Dependency Treebank. In Proceedings of TLT, 67-78. FAL MFF UK, Prague.

Bank. 2003. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC). Budapest, Hungary.

Barnbrook, Geoff. 1996. Language and Computers: A Practical Introduction to the Computer Analysis of Language. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.

Baskaran S. et al. 2007. Framework for a Common. Parts-of-Speech Tagset for Indic Languages. (Draft) http://research.microsoft.com/~baskaran/POSTagset/

Bayer, Josef. 2008. What is Verb Second? MS. University of Konstanz.

Begum, R., Husain, S., Sharma, D.M., Bai, L. 2008. Developing Verb Frames in Hindi. In Proceedings of LREC. Marrakech, Morocco.

Begum, R. Husain. S. Dhwaj, A. Sharma, D. M. Bai, L. and R. Sangal. 2008. Dependency annotation scheme for Indian Languages. In Proceedings of IJCNLP. Citeseer.

Begum, R. Jindal, K., Jain, A., Husain, S. and Sharma D.M. 2011. Identification of Conjunct Verbs in Hindi and its Effect on Parsing Accuracy. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 29-40.

Becker, D. Kashif, R. A Study in Urdu Corpus Construction. University of St. Thomas,

Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. U.S.A. Ms.

Bharati, A., Chaitanya, V., Sangal, R. and KV Ramakrishnamacharyulu. 1995. Natural Language Processing: A Paninian Perspective. Prentice-Hall of India.

Bharati A, D. M. Sharma, L. Bai and R. Sangal. 2006. AnnCorra: Annotating Corpora Guidelines For POS And Chunk Annotation For Indian Languages. LTRC Technical Report-31

Bharati A, D. M. Sharma, S. Husain, L. Bai, R. Begam, R. Sangal. 2012. AnnCorra: Treebanks for Indian Languages Guidelines For Annotation Hindi Treebank. LTRC Technical Report.

Bharati, A., Bhatia, M., Chaitanya, V. and R. Sangal. 1996. Paninian Grammar Framework Applied to English. Technical Report, Technical Report TRCS-96- 238, CSE, IIT Kanpur.

Bharati, A. Sangal, R. and D.M. Sharma. 2007. SSF: Shakti Standard Format Guide. Technical Report, Technical report, IIIT Hyderabad.

Bharati, A., Sharma, D.M., Husain, S., Bai, L., Begum, R. and R. Sangal. 2009. Anncorra: Treebanks for Indian Languages Guidelines for Annotating Hindi Treebank (version–2.0).

Bharati, A., Husain, S., Sharma, D.M., Sangal, R. 2008. A Two-Stage Constraint Based Dependency Parser for Free Word Order Languages. In Proceedings of the COLIPS IALP. Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Bhat, D.N.S. 1991. Grammatical Relations: the Evidence Against their Necessity and Universality. Psychology Press

Bhat S.M. 2012. Building large Scale POS Annotated Corpus for Hindi & Urdu (co-authored). In Proceedings of Workshop on Indian Language & Data: Resources & Evaluation (WILDRE), LREC 2012 (Istanbul, Turkey).  

Bhat S.M. 2010. Developing Fine-grained Hierarchical POS Tagset for Kashmiri. In Proceedings of International Conference on Language Development & Computing Methods ICLDCM, Coimbatore

Bhat, S.M. & Richa, S. 2011. Case Syncretism and Disambiguating Algorithms for Urdu-Hindi POS Tagging. In Interdisciplinary Journal of Linguistics 4:187-194/ University of Kashmir, Srinagar

Bhat, S.M. 2012. Introducing Kashmiri Dependency Treebank. In Workshop on Machine Translation and Parsing of Indian Languages (MTPIL), COLING 2012, IIT Mumbai, Mumbai

Bhat, S.M. 2011. Developing Small Scale Treebank for Kashmiri. In SCONLI-06, at Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. Ms.

Bhat, S.M. 2012. Empirical Method of Language Documentation: A Case Study of Compiling Kashmiri Corpus, In National Seminar on Endangered and Lesser Known Languages: Issues and Responses, 2012, LU, Lukhnow. Ms.

Bhat, S.M. 2013. Manual Chunking and Parsing Kashmiri Text Corpus. In International Conference of Linguistic Society of India (ICOLSI), Central Institute of Indian Languages (CIIL), Mysore. Ms.

Bhat, R.A. Bhat, S.M & D. M. Sharma. 2014. Towards Building a Kashmiri Treebank: Settingup A Trrbanking Pipeline. Ms.

Bhat, R. A. & D. M. Sharma. 2012. In Proceedings of the 6th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pages 157-165, Jeju, Republic of Korea. Association for Computational Linguistics

Bhat, R. A. & D. M. Sharma. 2013. Non-projective Structure in Indian Language Treebanks. Ms.

Bhat R. N. Dardic: What does the Label Denote? BHU, Varanasi. Ms.

Bhatt, R. B. Narasimhan, M. Palmer, O. Rambow, D.M. Sharma, and F. Xia. 2009. A multi-representational and multi-layered treebank for hindi/urdu. In Proceedings of the Third Linguistic Annotation Workshop: page 186-189. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Biber, Douglas. 1993. Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8.4.

Blake, Barry J. 2004. Case. Camdridge University Press: Cambridge.

Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. The University of Chicago Press.

Bögel, T. M. Butt, and S. Sulger. 2008. Urdu ezafe and the Morphology-syntax interface. In Proceedings of LFG ’08.

Bond, F. S. Fujita, and T. Tanaka. 2008. The Hinoki Syntactic and Semantic Treebank of Japanese. Language Resources and Evaluation 42(2):243–251.

Bod, R. and Scha, R. 1997. Data-oriented Language Processing. In Young and Bloothooft, pages 137–173.

Bod, R. 2003. Is there Evidence for a Probabilistic Language Faculty? Ms.

Bod, R. Hay, J. & Jannedy, S. (Eds.). 2003. Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Bod, R. Margaux, S. 2012. Empiricist Solutions to Nativist Puzzles by Means of Unsupervised TSG. In Proceedings of Workshop on Computational Models of Language Acquisition and Loss. EACL. Association of Computational Linguistics.

Bosco, C. Lombardo, V. 2004. Dependency and Relational Structure in Treebank Annotation. In Proceedings of Workshop on Recent Advances in Dependency Grammar at COLING.

Bosco, C. & Lombardo, V. 2003. A Relation-based Schema for Treebank Annotation. In Proceedings of the Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 8th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Pisa, Italy.

Bosco, C. & Lombardo, V. 2000. An Annotation Schema for an Italian Treebank. In Proceedings of the Student Session, 12th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, Birmingham, UK.

Brants, S., S. Dipper, P. Eisenberg, S. Hansen, E. Knig, W. Lezius, C. Rohrer, G. Smith & H. Uszkoreit, 2004. TIGER: Linguistic Interpretation of a German Corpus. In E. Hinrichs and K. Simov (Eds), Research on Language and Computation, Special Issue. Vol. 2: 597-620.

Brants, S. S. Dipper, S. Hansen, W. Lezius, and G. Smith. 2002. The Tiger Treebank. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories: page 24-41.

Brants, T. Wojciech S. and Hans U. 1999. Syntactic Annotation of a German Newspaper Corpus. In Proceedings of the ATALA Treebank Workshop. Paris, France.

Burkhardt, Petra. 2005. The Syntax–Discourse Interface: Representing and Interpreting Dependency. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia

Butt, Miriam. 2005. Theories of Case. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Butt, Rajesh. --- . Verb Movement in Kashmiri. Ms.

Buchholz, S. Marsi, E. 2006. CoNLL-X Shared Task on Multilingual Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of Tenth Conference on Computational Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Carroll, John. Guido Minnen. & Ted Briscoe. 1999. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC), Bergen, Norway.

Carletta, J. S. Isard, G. Doherty-Sneddon, A. Isard, J.C. Kowtko, and A.H. Anderson. 1997. The Reliability of a Dialogue structure Coding Scheme. Computational linguistics 23.1:13–31.

Chatterji, Sanjay,Tanaya Mukherjee Sarkar, Sudeshna Sarkar & Jayshree Chakraborty. 2009. Karak Relations in Bengali. In Proceedings of 31st All-India Conference of Linguists (AICL), Hyderabad, India, pp 33-36.

Chatterji, Sanjay, Praveen Sonare, Sudeshna Sarkar & Devshri Roy. 2009. Grammar driven rules for hybrid Bangla dependency parsing. In Proceedings of ICON09 NLP Tools Contest: Indian Language Dependency Parsing, Hyderabad, India, pp. 37-41.

Chaudhry, H. and D.M. Sharma. 2011. Annotation and Issues in Building an English Dependency Treebank.

Chater, N. & Manning, C.D. 2006. Probabilistic Models of Language Processing and Acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, pages 335-344.

Chen, K.-J. Luo, C. C. Gao, Z. M. Chang, M. C. Chen, F. Y. & Chen, C. J. 1999. The CKIP Chinese Treebank. In Journees ATALA sur les Corpus annot es pour la syntaxe, Talana, Paris VII: 85-96.

Charniak, E. (1993). Statistical Language Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Chen, K. J. et al., 2003. Building and Using Parsed Corpora. (A. Abeillé Eds). KLUWER: Dordrecht.

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Holland: Foris Publications.

Cloeren, J. 1999. Tagsets. In Syntactic Wordclass Tagging, Hans van Halteren (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Cohen, J. et al. 1960. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37-46.

Collins, M., Jan Hajič, L. Ramshaw and C. Tillmann. 1999. A Statistical Parser for Czech. In Proceedings of ACL: 505-512.

Collins, M. 1999. Head-driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. Ph.D. thesis.

Corbett, G., N. M. Fraser, and S. McGlashan, 1993. Heads in Grammatical Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Covington, M. A. (1984). Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.

Covington, M. A. (1990a). A dependency parser for variable-word-order languages,

Technical Report AI-1990-01, University of Georgia.

Covington, M. A. (1990b). Parsing Discontinuous Constituents in Dependency

Grammar. Computational Linguistics 16: pages 234-236.

Covington. M. A. 1990. A Dependency Parser for Variable Word Order Languages. Research Report AI-1994-02, Artificial Intelligence Programmes, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 U.S.A.

Covington. M. A. 1994. Discontinuous Dependency Parsing of Free and Fixed Word Order. Research Report AI-1994-02, Artificial Intelligence Programmes, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 U.S.A.

Covington. M. A. 2001. A Fundamental Algorithm for Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Southeast Conference, pages 95–102.

Cowper, Elizabeth. 2002. Finiteness. MS. University of Toronto

Culotta, A. and J. Sorensen. 2004. Dependency tree kernels for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics: 423. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Dandapat, Sandipan. 2008. Part-of-Speech Tagging for Bengali. Unpublished Dissertation. IIT Kharagpur.

Durrani, N. and S. Hussain. 2010. Urdu word segmentation. In Human Language Technologies, The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 528–536. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Dash, N. S. 2010. Corpus Linguistics: A General Introduction. Paper presented at CIIL, Mysore.

D. Chakrabarty, V. Sarma and P. Bhattacharyya. 2007. Complex Predicates in Indian

Language Wordnets, Lexical Resources and Evaluation Journal, 40 (3-4), 2007.

Debusmann, R. 2004. A Declarative Grammar Formalism for Dependency Grammar. Dissertation. Universitat des Saarlandes.

Dipper, S. 2008. Theory-driven and Corpus-driven Computational Linguistics, and the Use of Corpora. In Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, pp. 68-96.Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.

Dowty, D. 1982. Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar. In Jacobson, P. and Pullum, G., Editors, The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pages 79-130. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Eide, Kristin M. 2007. Finiteness. Paper presented at 3rd ScanDiaSyn Grand Meeting, Iceland.

E. Hajicova. 1998. Prague Dependency Treebank: From Analytic to Tectogrammatical Annotation. In Proc. TSD’98.

Fillmore, C. 1968. The Case for Case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds).

Fillmore, Charles J. 1992. Corpus Linguistics or Computer-aided Armchair Linguistics. In: Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium, 48 August 1991. Ed. By Jan Svartvik. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Fong, S. Robert C.B. ---. Treebank Parsing and Knowledge of Language: A Cognitive Perspective. Department of Linguistics and Computer Science, University of Arizona, Department of EECs, Brain and Cognitive Science, MIT. Ms.

Garside, R. 1987. The CLAWS Word-tagging System. In The Computational Analysis of English, Garside, Leech and Sampson, (eds). London: Longman.

Garside, R. Leech, L. & MacEnery, T. 1997. Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora. London and New York: Longman

Glynn, Dylan. 2010. Corpus-driven Cognitive Linguistics. A case study in polysemy. MS. Lund University.

Gries, Stefan. 2011. Corpus data in usage-based linguistics: What’s the right degree of granularity for the analysis of argument structure constructions? In Mario Brdar, Stefan Th. Gries, & Milena Žic Fuchs (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: convergence and expansion, 237-256. John Benjamins: Amsterdam & Philadelphia.

Gries, Stefan. 2012. The Corpus Linguistics: Quantitative Methods. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1380-1385. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford.

Gruber, J. S. 1965. Studies in Lexical Relations. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

Gupta, Mridul, Vineet Yadav, Samar Husain & Dipti M Sharma. 2008. A Rule Based Approach for Automatic Annotation of a Hindi TreeBank. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON-08).

Gupta, Swati. 2004. Aligning Hindi and Urdu Bilingual Corpora for Robust Projection. M.Sc. Report.

Habash, N. and Owen Rambow (2005). Arabic Tokenization, Morphological Analysis, and Part-of-Speech Tagging in One Fell Swoop. In Proceedings of the Conference of American Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL05).

Hajiˇc, J. 1998. Building a Syntactically Annotated Corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank. Issues of valency and meaning: 106–132.

Hajič, J. E. Hajicova, M. Holub, P. Pajas, P. Sgall, B. Vidova-Hladka, and V. Reznickova. 2001. The Current Status of the Prague Dependency Treebank. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) 2166: 11-20, NY.

Hajicova, E. and M. Ceplov, 2000. Deletions and Their Reconstruction in Tectogrammatical Syntactic Tagging of Very Large Corpora. In Proceedings of Coling: 278-284.

Hajicov´a, E. 1998. Prague Dependency Treebank: From Analytic to Tectogrammatical Annotation. In Proceedings of TSD ’98: 45–50.

Hajicova, E., A. Abeill´e, J. Hajiˇc, J. M´ırovsk´y, and Z. Ureˇsov´a. 2010. Treebank Annotation. In Nitin Indurkhya and Fred J. Damerau (eds), Handbook of Natural Language Processing, Second Edition. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.

Hammond, Michael. 2003. Programming for Linguists: Perl for Language Researchers. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.

Hardie, A. 2003. Developing a Tagset for Automated Part-of-speech Tagging in Urdu. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics ‘03.

Hardie, A. 2004. The Computational Analysis of Morpho-syntactic Categories in Urdu. PhD Dissertation, Lancaster University.

Haspelmath M. 1997. From Space to Time Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 03. LINCOM EUROPA München – Newcastle

Herrera, Jesus. 2007. Building Corpora for the Development of a Dependency Parser for Spanish Using Maltparser. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 39: pages 181-186.

Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY C. Fillmore, P. Kay & M. O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64: 501-538.

HSK_Corpus Linguistics, MILES, Release 18.02x on Friday December 7 16:20:48 BST 2007, gesp. unter: HSKCOR$U13/letzter Rechenvorgang: 14-01-08 10:04:45

Hudson, R. 1984. Word Grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford and New York.

Hudson, R. 1990. English Word Grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford and Cambridge.

Hudson, R. 2003. The Psychological Reality of Syntactic Dependency Relations. MTT, Pasis. Ms.

Hudson, R. --- . Discontinuous Phrases in Dependency Grammar. Ms.

Jarvinen, T. 2000. Bank of English and Beyond Hand-crafted Parsers for Functional Annotation. In Abeille, 2000, pages 43–59.

Kinsbury, P. and Palmer, M. 2002. From Tree-Bank to PropBank. In Proceedings of LREC, Las Palmas, Spain.

Kinsbury, P., Palmer, M., and Marcus, M. 2002. Adding Semantic Annotation to the Penn TreeBank. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, San Diego California.

Husain, Samar, Phani Chaitanya, Ganeshwar Rao Dulam, Tariq Khan & Dipti M. Sharma. 2009. Using Levins Verb Classification for Preposition Sense Selection in English to Indian Language MT. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language and Technology 2009 (CLT09), Lahore, Pakistan.

Hussain, M. 1987. Geography of Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, Rajesh publications.

Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press: Cambridge.

Jacque, Kristin. 2006. Analysis of a Potential Latin Treebank. MS.

J. Daniel & James. H. Martin. 1999. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics and Speech Recognition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Kahane, Sylvain. ---. Why to Choose Dependency Rather Than Constituency for Syntax: A Formal Point of View. MS. Modyco-Université Paris Ouest Nanterr & CNRS.

Kakkonen, T. 2006. DepAnn - An Annotation Tool for Dependency Treebanks. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ESSLLI Student Session. Janneke Huitink & Sopia Katrenko (eds.)

Kakkonen, T. 2006 Dependency Treebanks: Methods, Annotation Schemes and Tools.

http://arXiv:cs/0610124v1 [cs.CL] 20 Oct 2006

Keith, A. 2007. The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics. Equinox Publishing Ltd, London.

Kidwai, Ayesha. 2007. A Handbook for Research Scholars. URL: www.jnu.ac.in/SLLCS/SLLCS%20Research%20Manual.pdf‎

King, T. H., R. Crouch, S. Riezler, M. Dalrymple and R. Kaplan. 2003. The PARC700 Dependency.

Kingsbury, P. and M. Palmer. 2002. From treebank to propbank. In Proceedings of LREC.

Kiparsky, P. ---. On the Architecture of Panini’s Grammar. Stanford University. Ms.

Kiparsky, P. 1994. Paninian Linguistics, Asher R.E., Ed., Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford, New York

Kiparsky, P. ---. Panini is Slik But He is not Mean. Stanford University. Ms.

Kiparsky, P. 2007. Panini’s Razor. Paris. Ms.

Kiparsky, P. 1979. Panini as a Variationist. MIT Press and Poona University Press,.

Kiparsky, P. 1991. On Paninian Studies. Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 19:189-225

Kiparsky, P. ---. Dvandvas, Blocking, and the Associative: The Bumpy Ride from Phrase to Word. Ms.

Kiparsky, P. ---. Event Structure and the Perfect. Ms.

Kiparsky, P. ---. The Shift to Head-Initial VP in Germanic. Ms.

Kiparsky, P. ---. Towards a Null Theory of the Passive. Ms.

Kiparsky, P. ---. Grammaticalization as Optimization. Ms.

Klein, D. and C. D. Manning. 2003. Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing. In Proceedings of ACL-.Japan.

Kolachina, Prasanth, Sudheer Kolachina, Anil Kumar Singh, Samar Husain, Viswanatha Naidu, Rajeev Sangal & Akshar Bharati. ---- . Grammar Extraction from Treebanks for Hindi and Telugu. MS. Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT-Hyderabad, India

Koul, Omkar N. 2006. Modern Kashmiri Grammar. USA: McNeil Technologies, Inc.Manfred Krifka

Krifka, Manfred. 2006. Basic Notions of Information Structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 06, Féry, Fanselow and Krifka (Eds.)

Kroch, A. Taylor A. --- .Verb Movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect Variation and Language Contact. Ms

Kroch, A. Taylor A. 2000. Verb-Object Order in Early Middle English. Ms.

Kübler. Sandra, Ryan McDonald, and Joakim Nivre. 2009. Dependency Parsing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Graeme Hirst (Ed) Morgan & Claypool Publishers.