What was the deal proposed by the Israelis that linked Iran and the Contras?
What was the objective of the deal?
What is the downside of this sort of deal ?
What about buying back slaves in Africa?
Why did the Contras get added to the deal?
Was the Arms Sale to Iran Legal?
Can the president authorize the sale of arms to Iran (through Israel) as part of his inherent constitutional powers?
Would this be easier to justify if the sale has been direct to Iran?
Hostage Act
What was the original intent of the Hostage Act?
Does it matter that the hostages were held by a different country than Iran?
What provision of the Hostage Act was ignored?
Arms Export Control Act
What does the AECA require before foreign arms sales?
the transfer ‘‘will strengthen the security of the United States and promote world peace,’’ and unless the transferee agrees in writing not to further transfer the items without obtaining the consent of the President.
What did Secretary of State Schultz determine in 1984 that complicates the use of the Arms Export Control Act and other legal authorities?
Was Israel respecting the no secondary transfer requirement?
Does the AECA Control?
What classification did the president use to get out from under the Arms Export Control Act?
But may the President avoid the AECA simply by labeling an arms transfer as a covert action?
What were the Congressional conflicts over the Amendments?
How is this like the debate over limiting actions in Iran?
How is this different?
Boland II
What did Boland II provide?
What prompted this amendment?
What did Congress think the amendment meant?
Are there constitutional limits on acts such as the Boland Amendment?
There is no penalty provision in the Boland amendment - does it need one?
Interpreting Boland
First, does the language ‘‘any other agency or entity’’ cover only agencies traditionally involved in intelligence operations, or does it also apply to any entity that is actually so involved?
Second, does ‘‘involved’’ encompass indirect support?
Third, does the phrase ‘‘no funds available’’ apply only to the then-current DOD appropriation or to all government funds?
How did the White House try it take advantage of its interpretation questions to get around Boland II?
How does Congress provide funding for special forces so that they there is no detailed information about them in the budget?
Was it appropriate for the White House to use this money when the Congressional appropriations ran out for supporting the Contras?
The Funding Restrictions
What did the GAO report on government contracting say about the White House theory that the "no funds" provision only applied to funds in the defense appropriations bill that the Boland Amendment was part of?
Why might congress have used "no funds" rather than language about specific appropriations?
Putting aside policy and constitutional considerations, why is it a bad idea to allow private funds to avoid Congressional budget limitations?
The President's Involvement
What did Regan say about what he knew and authorized?
How did this defuse the impeachment issue?
What was later support for this position?
If there are no presidential findings, where does this leave the legal status of these activities, even if they might have been legal with presidential findings?