4.3.3.2 Ecological Conditions of the River Bed and Flood Plain
Kabeli River stretch in the reservoir and the downstream sections to the confluence with Tamor River (directly project affected area) is a fast flowing river with series of rapids, runs and pools (Table 4.24). During the field visits the left and right banks of the river (depending on the water depth and flow) had a number of spawning and rearing grounds for fishes. This spawning ground information of the selected species will be mapped along the affected stretch of the river and in the river section upstream of the dam site.
However, these sites change year after year especially after the moonsoon floods. The river bed material is comprised of boulders, cobbles and pebbles with sandy admixtures. Occasionally, the river banks and boulders show growth of the green algae.
Table 4.24: Aquatic Habitat Characterization of Kabeli River in the Directly Project Affected Area
Site No. (refer Figure 1.2)
|
Name of Sampling site
|
Habitat Characterization (Estimated)
|
Major spawning area
|
Major Rearing area
|
1
|
Dam Site
|
Run type of water
-
Rapid flow (80 %)
-
Run (10 %)
-
Deep and shallow pools (5 %)
-
Riffle (5 %)
|
Three spawning areas between Dam site to Khimuna hanging bridge
|
Three rearing grounds in between Dam site to Confluence of Puwa khola
|
2
|
Downstream of Dam site
|
Run type of water
-
Rapid flow (75 %)
-
Run (10 %)
-
Deep and shallow pools (10 %)
-
Riffle (5 %)
|
Six spawning areas between Kabeli hanging bridge to Khola Kharka.
And Bichbagar daha
|
Five rearing grounds between Kabeli hanging bridge to Khola Kharka.
|
3
|
Upsteram of Kabeli confluence with Tamor
|
Run type of water
-
Rapid (70 %)
-
Run (20 %)
-
Deep and shallow pools (5 %)
-
Riffle (5 %)
|
Five spawning areas between Kakaro to Kabeli hanging bridge
|
Two rearing grounds in between Kakaro to Kabeli hanging bridge.
|
(Field visit on October 3-10, 2010)
4.3.3.3 Fish
A total of 31 fish species were recorded during the field survey. Out of 31 recorded species, 12 species were found during the field survey in October 2010 and 9 were registered in July 2013, the remaining 19 species were reported by local residents during interviews in October 2010. Schizothorzx richardsonii, Schizothorax progastus, Botia lohachata, Botia almorhae, Glyptothorax pectinopterus, Glyptothorax cavia, Glyptothorax telchitta, Noemacheilus beavani, Noemacheilus botia, Neolissocheilus hexagonolepis, Tor tor, Tor putitora, Bagarius yarrelli, Garra annandalei, Barilius bendelisis, and Labeo dero are the major species observed and reported during the field visit. Tables 4.25 and 4.26 present the number of observed species in the different sampling stations in 2010 and 2013, while Tables 4.27 and 4.28 present the species observed during the sampling period in 2010 and 2013 respectively. Table 4.29 gives the total number of fish species observed and reported in Kabeli River in 2010 .
Table 4.25: Number of Fish Species Recorded and Observed in the Sampling Stations (2010)
Station No
|
Station
|
Unit
|
Field Visit
|
Total Observed
|
Total Recorded
|
Site No. 1
|
Dam Site
|
Number
|
6
|
23
|
Site No. 2
|
Down stream of Dam site
|
Number
|
10
|
21
|
Site No. 3
|
Upsteram of Kabeli confluence with Tamor
|
Number
|
10
|
21
|
(Field Survey: October 3-10, 2010)
Table 4.26: Number of Fish Species Recorded and Observed in the Sampling Stations (2013)
Station No
|
Station
|
Unit
|
Field Visit
|
Total species Observed
|
Total no. of fish Recorded
|
Site No. 1
|
11 KM upstream of dam
|
Number
|
4
|
5
|
Site No. 2
|
8 KM upstream of dam
|
Number
|
3
|
6
|
Site No. 3
|
Downstream of dam
|
Number
|
7
|
13
|
Site No. 4
|
Kabeli confluence at Tamor
|
Number
|
5
|
13
|
(Field Survey: July 7- 11, 2013)
Table 4.27: Fish Species Recorded in Sampling Stations (2010)
S.N
|
Scientific Name of Fish
|
Local Name of Fish
|
Site N. 1
|
Site N. 2
|
Site N. 3
|
1
|
Barilius bendelisis
|
Fakata
|
|
+
|
+
|
2
|
Barilius Vagra
|
Faketa
|
|
+
|
+
|
3
|
Crossocheilus latius
|
Lohari
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
4
|
Garra annandalei
|
Buduna
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
5
|
Garra gotyla
|
Buduna
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
Glyptosterrum blythi
|
Tilkabre
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
Labeo dero
|
Gardi
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
Neolissochilus hexagonolepis
|
Katle
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
9
|
Psilorhynchuspseudecheneis
|
Tite
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
10
|
Schizothorax progastus
|
Chuchche asala
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
11
|
Schizothorax richardsoni
|
Buchche asala
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
12
|
Tor putitora
|
Sahar
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
Total
|
|
6
|
10
|
10
|
(Field Survey: October 3-10, 2010)
Table 4.28 Fish Species Observed in Sampling Stations (2013)
S.N
|
Scientific Name of Fish
|
Local Name of Fish
|
Site N. 1
|
Site N. 2
|
Site N. 3
|
Site N. 4
|
1
|
Barilius bendelisis
|
Fakata
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
2
|
Crossocheilus latius
|
Lohari
|
|
|
+
|
+
|
3
|
Garra gotyla
|
Buduna, Hoya
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
4
|
Labeo dero
|
Gardi
|
|
|
|
+
|
5
|
Neolissochilus hexagonolepis
|
Katle
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
Psilorhynchus pseudecheneis
|
Tite
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
7
|
Schizothorax richardsonii
|
Buchche asala
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
Botia lohachata
|
Baghi, Sisne
|
|
|
+
|
|
9
|
Pseudecheneis sulcatus
|
Kabre
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
Total
|
|
4
|
3
|
7
|
5
|
(Field Survey: July 7-11, 2013)
Table 4.29: Fish Species Observed and Recorded in Sampling Stations (2010)
SN
|
Scientific Name of Fish
|
Local Name of Fish
|
Site N. 1
|
Site N. 2
|
Site N. 3
|
Observed Species
|
Reported Species
|
Observed Species
|
Reported Species
|
Observed Species
|
Reported Species
|
1
|
Anguilla bengalensis
|
Rajbam
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
2
|
Bagarius yarrelli
|
Gonch
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
3
|
Barilius barila
|
Faketa
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
4
|
Barilius bendelisis
|
Fakata
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
5
|
Barilius shacra
|
Fakata
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
6
|
Barilius Vagra
|
Faketa
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
7
|
Botia almorhae
|
baghi
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
8
|
Botia lohachata
|
Chital baghi
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
9
|
Clupisoma garua
|
Jalkapoor
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
10
|
Crossocheilus latius
|
Lohari
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
11
|
Garra annandalei
|
Buduna
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
12
|
Garra gotyla
|
Buduna
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
13
|
Glyptosterrum blythi
|
tilkabre
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
14
|
Glyptothorax cavia
|
Kabre
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
15
|
Glyptothorax pectinopterus
|
Kabre
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
16
|
Glyptothorax telchitta
|
Rato kabre
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
17
|
Heteropneustes fossilis
|
Singhi
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
18
|
Labeo angra
|
Theda
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
19
|
Labeo dero
|
Gardi
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
20
|
Mastacembalus armatus
|
Bam
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
21
|
Neolissochilus hexagonolepis
|
Katle
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
22
|
Noemachilus beavani
|
Gadela
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
23
|
Noemacheilus botia
|
Gadela
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
24
|
Psedecheneis sulcatus
|
Kabre
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
25
|
Psilorhynchuspseudecheneis
|
Tite (Endemic)
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
26
|
Puntius conchonius
|
Pothia
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
27
|
Puntius ticto
|
pothia
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
28
|
Schizothorax progastus
|
Chuchche asala
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
29
|
Schizothorax richardsoni
|
Buchche asala
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
30
|
Tor putitora
|
Sahar
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
+
|
|
31
|
Tor tor
|
Sahar
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
+
|
|
Total
|
|
6
|
23
|
10
|
21
|
10
|
21
|
Source: Field visit, 2010
Though the surveyed river stretch is small, there is a distinct difference in the fish species composition from the upstream to downstream section. The downstream section shows the higher number of fish species compared to the upstream areas. Studies elsewhere in Nepalese Himalaya also show the lower fish species composition in the upstream areas than in the downstream areas (Himal Power Ltd. 2006; EIA Middle Marsyangdi, 2001, T. Petr, 2002).
Depending on the river flow, seasons, water depth, food availability and waster temperature, fish species occupy different river stretches, hence, the sampling survey conducted only twice in three years might not have captured the entire composition of fish diversity as reported by the local fishermen. Therefore, to capture the reported diversity composition of the fish species, the sampling study needs to be expanded to other seasons during early stages of construction periods and through commencement of operations.This sampling will be started during a monsoon season in 2013 and will be followed up in the project’s EPM. As part of the EMP, the sampling stations upto 10 km upstream of the headworks are supposed to obtain more information on the fish species gradient in the river (refer Section 6.1.1.2, chapter VI and Section 8.3, Chapter VIII for details of the potential sampling stations).
Dostları ilə paylaş: |