Chapter 1: introduction


Ecological Conditions of the River Bed and Flood Plain



Yüklə 3,88 Mb.
səhifə24/53
tarix30.07.2018
ölçüsü3,88 Mb.
#64564
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   ...   53

4.3.3.2 Ecological Conditions of the River Bed and Flood Plain


Kabeli River stretch in the reservoir and the downstream sections to the confluence with Tamor River (directly project affected area) is a fast flowing river with series of rapids, runs and pools (Table 4.24). During the field visits the left and right banks of the river (depending on the water depth and flow) had a number of spawning and rearing grounds for fishes. This spawning ground information of the selected species will be mapped along the affected stretch of the river and in the river section upstream of the dam site.

However, these sites change year after year especially after the moonsoon floods. The river bed material is comprised of boulders, cobbles and pebbles with sandy admixtures. Occasionally, the river banks and boulders show growth of the green algae.



Table 4.24: Aquatic Habitat Characterization of Kabeli River in the Directly Project Affected Area

Site No. (refer Figure 1.2)

Name of Sampling site

Habitat Characterization (Estimated)

Major spawning area

Major Rearing area

1

Dam Site

Run type of water

  • Rapid flow (80 %)

  • Run (10 %)

  • Deep and shallow pools (5 %)

  • Riffle (5 %)

Three spawning areas between Dam site to Khimuna hanging bridge

Three rearing grounds in between Dam site to Confluence of Puwa khola

2

Downstream of Dam site

Run type of water

  • Rapid flow (75 %)

  • Run (10 %)

  • Deep and shallow pools (10 %)

  • Riffle (5 %)




Six spawning areas between Kabeli hanging bridge to Khola Kharka.

And Bichbagar daha



Five rearing grounds between Kabeli hanging bridge to Khola Kharka.


3

Upsteram of Kabeli confluence with Tamor

Run type of water

  • Rapid (70 %)

  • Run (20 %)

  • Deep and shallow pools (5 %)

  • Riffle (5 %)




Five spawning areas between Kakaro to Kabeli hanging bridge


Two rearing grounds in between Kakaro to Kabeli hanging bridge.


(Field visit on October 3-10, 2010)

4.3.3.3 Fish


A total of 31 fish species were recorded during the field survey. Out of 31 recorded species, 12 species were found during the field survey in October 2010 and 9 were registered in July 2013, the remaining 19 species were reported by local residents during interviews in October 2010. Schizothorzx richardsonii, Schizothorax progastus, Botia lohachata, Botia almorhae, Glyptothorax pectinopterus, Glyptothorax cavia, Glyptothorax telchitta, Noemacheilus beavani, Noemacheilus botia, Neolissocheilus hexagonolepis, Tor tor, Tor putitora, Bagarius yarrelli, Garra annandalei, Barilius bendelisis, and Labeo dero are the major species observed and reported during the field visit. Tables 4.25 and 4.26 present the number of observed species in the different sampling stations in 2010 and 2013, while Tables 4.27 and 4.28 present the species observed during the sampling period in 2010 and 2013 respectively. Table 4.29 gives the total number of fish species observed and reported in Kabeli River in 2010 .

Table 4.25: Number of Fish Species Recorded and Observed in the Sampling Stations (2010)

Station No

Station

Unit

Field Visit

Total Observed

Total Recorded

Site No. 1

Dam Site

Number

6

23

Site No. 2

Down stream of Dam site

Number

10

21

Site No. 3

Upsteram of Kabeli confluence with Tamor

Number

10

21

(Field Survey: October 3-10, 2010)
Table 4.26: Number of Fish Species Recorded and Observed in the Sampling Stations (2013)

Station No

Station

Unit

Field Visit

Total species Observed

Total no. of fish Recorded

Site No. 1

11 KM upstream of dam

Number

4

5

Site No. 2

8 KM upstream of dam

Number

3

6

Site No. 3

Downstream of dam

Number

7

13

Site No. 4

Kabeli confluence at Tamor

Number

5

13

(Field Survey: July 7- 11, 2013)
Table 4.27: Fish Species Recorded in Sampling Stations (2010)

S.N

Scientific Name of Fish

Local Name of Fish

Site N. 1

Site N. 2

Site N. 3

1

Barilius bendelisis

Fakata

 

+

+

2

Barilius Vagra

Faketa

 

+

+

3

Crossocheilus latius

Lohari

+

+

+

4

Garra annandalei

Buduna

+

+

+

5

Garra gotyla

Buduna

+

+

+

6

Glyptosterrum blythi

Tilkabre

+

+

+

7

Labeo dero

Gardi

+

+

+

8

Neolissochilus hexagonolepis

Katle

+

+

+

9

Psilorhynchuspseudecheneis

Tite

+

+

+

10

Schizothorax progastus

Chuchche asala

+

+

+

11

Schizothorax richardsoni

Buchche asala

+

+

+

12

Tor putitora

Sahar

 

+

+




Total

 

6

10

10

(Field Survey: October 3-10, 2010)

Table 4.28 Fish Species Observed in Sampling Stations (2013)

S.N

Scientific Name of Fish

Local Name of Fish

Site N. 1

Site N. 2

Site N. 3

Site N. 4

1

Barilius bendelisis

Fakata

+







+

2

Crossocheilus latius

Lohari







+

+

3

Garra gotyla

Buduna, Hoya

+




+




4

Labeo dero

Gardi










+

5

Neolissochilus hexagonolepis

Katle

+

+

+

+

6

Psilorhynchus pseudecheneis

Tite




+

+




7

Schizothorax richardsonii

Buchche asala

+

+

+

+

8

Botia lohachata

Baghi, Sisne







+




9

Pseudecheneis sulcatus

Kabre







+







Total

 

4

3

7

5

(Field Survey: July 7-11, 2013)
Table 4.29: Fish Species Observed and Recorded in Sampling Stations (2010)

SN

Scientific Name of Fish

Local Name of Fish

Site N. 1

Site N. 2

Site N. 3

Observed Species

Reported Species

Observed Species

Reported Species

Observed Species

Reported Species

1

Anguilla bengalensis

Rajbam

 

+

 

+

 

+

2

Bagarius yarrelli

Gonch

 

+

 

+

 

+

3

Barilius barila

Faketa

 

+

 

+

 

+

4

Barilius bendelisis

Fakata

 

+

+

 

+

 

5

Barilius shacra

Fakata

 

+

 

+

 

+

6

Barilius Vagra

Faketa

 

+

+

 

+

 

7

Botia almorhae

baghi

 

+

 

+

 

+

8

Botia lohachata

Chital baghi

 

+

 

+

 

+

9

Clupisoma garua

Jalkapoor

 

+

 

+

 

+

10

Crossocheilus latius

Lohari

 

+

+

 

 

+

11

Garra annandalei

Buduna

+

 

+

 

+

 

12

Garra gotyla

Buduna

+

 

+

 

+

 

13

Glyptosterrum blythi

tilkabre

 

+

 

+

+

 

14

Glyptothorax cavia

Kabre

 

+

 

+

 

+

15

Glyptothorax pectinopterus

Kabre

 

+

 

+

 

+

16

Glyptothorax telchitta

Rato kabre

 

+

 

+

 

+

17

Heteropneustes fossilis

Singhi

 

+

 

+

 

+

18

Labeo angra

Theda

 

+

 

+

 

+

19

Labeo dero

Gardi

+

 

+

 

+

 

20

Mastacembalus armatus

Bam

 

+

 

+

 

+

21

Neolissochilus hexagonolepis

Katle

+

+

+

 

+

 

22

Noemachilus beavani

Gadela

 

+

 

+

 

+

23

Noemacheilus botia

Gadela

 

+

 

+

 

+

24

Psedecheneis sulcatus

Kabre

 

+

 

+

 

+

25

Psilorhynchuspseudecheneis

Tite (Endemic)

+

 

+

 

 

+

26

Puntius conchonius

Pothia

 

 

 

+

 

+

27

Puntius ticto

pothia

 

 

 

+

 

+

28

Schizothorax progastus

Chuchche asala

 

+

+

 

+

 

29

Schizothorax richardsoni

Buchche asala

+

 

+

 

+

 

30

Tor putitora

Sahar

 

+

 

+

+

 

31

Tor tor

Sahar

 

+

 

+

 

+

 

Total

 

6

23

10

21

10

21

Source: Field visit, 2010

Though the surveyed river stretch is small, there is a distinct difference in the fish species composition from the upstream to downstream section. The downstream section shows the higher number of fish species compared to the upstream areas. Studies elsewhere in Nepalese Himalaya also show the lower fish species composition in the upstream areas than in the downstream areas (Himal Power Ltd. 2006; EIA Middle Marsyangdi, 2001, T. Petr, 2002).



Depending on the river flow, seasons, water depth, food availability and waster temperature, fish species occupy different river stretches, hence, the sampling survey conducted only twice in three years might not have captured the entire composition of fish diversity as reported by the local fishermen. Therefore, to capture the reported diversity composition of the fish species, the sampling study needs to be expanded to other seasons during early stages of construction periods and through commencement of operations.This sampling will be started during a monsoon season in 2013 and will be followed up in the project’s EPM. As part of the EMP, the sampling stations upto 10 km upstream of the headworks are supposed to obtain more information on the fish species gradient in the river (refer Section 6.1.1.2, chapter VI and Section 8.3, Chapter VIII for details of the potential sampling stations).

Yüklə 3,88 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   ...   53




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin