Council regulation

CALCULATION OF THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE HEALTH CHECK PROPOSALS IN THE MARKET SECTOR
									Mio €
Budget year				Legal base	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013
A. HC abolition of set aside and restricting intervention to wheat only
Impact on export refunds for cereals					0,0	0,0	0,0	0,0	0,0
Impact on intervention storage for cereals, including limiting intervention to wheat*				Art. 10-13, Art. 18	0,0	23,7	47,8	78,3	73,3
B. Other measures
Premium for potato starch				Art. 84a, 95a				–43,4	–43,4
Production refunds for starch				ex Art. 96			0,0	0,0	0,0
TOTAL					0,0	23,7	47,8	34,9	29,9
* The HC scenario has been calculated with buying-in wheat at the full intervention price. However, with intervention based on tendering (HC proposal), this should be considered as a maximum impact. The magnitude of any reduction is not quantifiable at this stage.
RICE SECTOR
– Abolition of rice intervention				Art. 10			–	–	–
FLAX AND HEMP				R. 1234/2007
– Transitory coupled aid				Art. 92 to 94				–4,2	–8,1
DRIED FODDER				R. 1234/2007
– Abolition of market aid				Art. 86 to 90			–52,3	–145,2	–145,2
MILK SECTOR
A. Measures made optional with possible budgetary impact:
– Butter intervention: optional intervention by tender after purchase of 30 000 t by tender				Art. 18
– SMP intervention: optional interv. by tender after obligatory purchase of 109 000 t by tender				Art. 18
– Private storage for butter is made optional as based on the market situation				Art. 34a		(–18)	(–18)	(–18)	(–18)
– Aid for SMP as feeding stuff is made optional as based on the market situation				Art. 99
– Aid for casein production is made optional as based on the market situation				Art. 100
B. Measures with budgetary impact:
– Abolition of the disposal aid for butter				ex Art. 101		–10,0	–10,0	–10,0	–10,0
– Abolition of the private storage aid for cheese				ex Art. 28(b)		–24,0	–24,0	–24,0	–24,0
C. Quota system (soft landing)
– Impact on the export refunds (b)						1,6	2,5	2,3	2,1
TOTAL MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS						–32,4	–31,5	–31,7	–31,9
PIGMEAT SECTOR
– Abolition of pigmeat intervention				ex Art. 17		–	–	–	–
Abolition of Art. 44 of R. 1234/2007 (animal diseases) (a)				ex Art. 44	a	–	–	–	–
(a) With the proposal these measures will in the future be financed under the new Article 60 of the new regulation replacing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
(b) assuming that the hypothesis retained for market balance will materialise.

CALCULATION OF THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE HEALTH CHECK PROPOSALS IN THE DIRECT PAYMENTS SECTOR
Budget year	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013
DIRECT PAYMENTS (before modulation)
A. Impact of adding new measures in the direct payments and abolishing some existing direct payments			0,0	–90,0	85,8	85,8
B. Impact of decoupling in SPS existing coupled direct payments			0,0	–54,1	–54,1	–54,1
C. Impact of decoupling in SPS existing re-coupled direct payments previously excluded			0,0	0,0	0,0	0,0
TOTAL DIRECT PAYMENTS (excluding effect of modulation)			0,0	–144,1	31,7	31,7
D. Transfer of modulation amount to Rural Development			563	977	1427	2022

Budget year	Legal base	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013
INCLUSION OF NEW MEASURES IN DIRECT PAYMENTS (SPS/SAPS) AND ABOLITION OF EXISTING DIRECT PAYMENTS (before modulation)
A. New measures included in the direct payments scheme (SPS or SAPS)	Title III
Dried fodder	Proposal					124,3	124,3
Long Fibre flax						8,1	8,1
Potato starch processing aid						43,4	43,4
B. Abolition of existing direct payments scheme
Energy crops	ex Art. 88				–90,0	–90,0	–90,0
C. Impact = A + B				0,0	–90,0	85,8	85,8