103
accounts are ransacked,
private chats opened, and their information is collected and sold
without their consent. It is the harsh reality of social media, always biting the hand that feeds
it.
The respondents were also asked about their knowledge of terms and conditions of the
various social media platforms. 70% of them confirmed that they had never read the terms
and conditions, especially the privacy policies of these platforms. This represented the
average social media platform user. It is unfortunate but not surprising to find out that users
do not actually read the terms and conditions of social media platforms. This seems to be
what social
media platforms count on, their users being uninformed of the contents of the
privacy policies or the entire terms and conditions. This is why the terms are flashed to users
uncomfortably during setup and they are told to agree to them in order to continue with the
account setting up process. They are strategically placed at that point because they are wordy
and complex, thus most users will quickly click on agreeing to the terms. What they do not
know is that that is the point they sell their rights. That is the point where social media
platforms are given the rights to own a user's information. Social media platforms know that
what they do is not totally good and thus they come up with long or complex worded privacy
policies to discourage users from reading them. In the United Kingdom, the MPs said that the
social media platforms used complex terms and conditions for the average user who has
never stepped in a law class to understand. This is exactly why the average user will not
know what happens to his/her data when he/she signs up with a social media platform. This
research shows that a majority of users simply agree to terms and conditions that they are not
knowledgeable of.
Concerning the security of social media platforms, 62% said that it was the burden of
social media platforms to ensure that they were safe. 20% of them said that the responsibility
lay with the government to ensure that their privacy was not violated. The last 18% said that
104
the responsibility fell on them. This is a clear illustration of how normal users think about
their online privacy when it comes to who should enforce it. 62% of these respondents were
of the opinion that since the social media companies created these platforms, it was upon
them to ensure security and privacy of the users. These views can be viewed as the general
feeling of quite a substantial number of social media users. They know that these companies
had developers build these systems from scratch and
within the development process, the
companies ought to have ensured that total security was provided for users. This security
must have included protection from privacy invasion from other users and third parties. It
seems that these platforms only made the platforms for one-sided privacy. Users can, up to a
certain level, protect themselves from other users. They can change their social media
accounts to be private thus inaccessible to others, and they can block users that they find
annoying or with malicious intentions. On the other side, the users cannot enforce their
privacy from the prying eyes of the social media companies and
the third parties that are
given extensive access to user private information (Krishnamurthy and Wills, 2009). There
are no restrictive settings that users can deploy to prevent these two intruders from collecting
and using their data.
Another group believed that it is upon their governments to fight for their social
media security and privacy. This is doable by laying down certain policies and establishing
strict legislations. To the surprise of this group, some governments have been in cahoots with
these social media companies to give them the private user information that they ought to be
protecting. Other governments are simply not getting involved, probably quieted by some
monetary rewards from these platforms for their silence. There are a few organizations such
as the EU that are highly vocal concerning its citizens' privacy. Lastly,
there was a group that
believed that their online security and privacy fell majorly upon them. These are the users
that are aware of the existing security threats on social media, especially stalkers, and identity
105
thieves (Krombholz, Merkl, and Weippl, 2012). They know that the more personal
information
they share on social media, the more danger they put themselves in. This danger
can be extended to their family and friends too as has been seen previously when identity
thieves start asking for money from frequently contacted people by their victim. These users
are also aware that their information is being collected by the social media platforms and thus
have reduced the amount of personal information that they share or have reduced posting on
social media. There is quite a number of users that are opting not to post on some rather
insecure platforms such as Facebook and this is why the company has
started reposting a
user’s old posts. This is the group that most users ought to be in but unfortunately, not all are
informed enough to make this decision.
Dostları ilə paylaş: