Dar seafood ppp standard

Is the current definition of seafood in the Code adequate in terms of defining the commodities that the standard needs to cover? - Should be revisited to provide clarity. - Definition appears satisfactory. - The Seafood Definition used by Codex would appear to be suitable. - Should include fish, crustacea, molluscs and other marine invertebrates. - Definition should not include crocodile or seaweed.
Simplot SA DHS SASMPA PIRSA SFM, MFMAA
Should the proposed standard include aquatic plants, reptiles and mammals (which has implications for native fishing rights)? - No. - No, unless significant public health risks identified. - Include aquatic plants, exclude crocodile and mammalian meat. - Include these, but define the point at which they become seafood subject to the provisions of the standard. - Include aquatic plants, as some States already include these in legislation. - Questions whether the current crocodile meat standard is adequate. - Food safety still relevant to native rights, but low risk best addressed through risk communication