Public Consultation
Written Submissions in Response to the Initial Assessment Report
A total of twenty-five written submissions were received by FSANZ in response to the Initial Assessment Report of Proposal P265. Submissions originated from a range of organisations and individuals representing industry sectors across the supply chain and all levels of government. A summary of the individual submissions is presented at Attachment 5.
A compilation of the responses to the specific issues raised for comment in the Initial Assessment Report is presented at Attachment 6. These issues mainly concerned:
-
scope of the Standard, including:
- the inclusion of chemical and biological hazards within the standard and the Code as a whole;
- at what point within the seafood industry the Standard should commence and cease to apply;
- the position of ready-to-eat seafood under the Standard; and
- the position of harvesting, handling and processing seafood on board fishing vessels under the standard;
-
definition of seafood, including whether aquatic plants, reptiles and mammals should be regulated under the Standard;
-
scientific risk assessment process which underpins FSANZ’s development of regulatory measures, and the provision of technical data for this purpose;
-
suitability of existing standards, such as the industry-preferred voluntary standard (the Australian Seafood Standard), any State government standards and any international standards, to form the basis for the national mandatory standard; and
-
options available to manage food safety risks, including:
- costs and benefits of management options;
- compliance and enforcement costs, mechanisms and concerns; and
- the need for, and development of, guidelines.
The range of opinion on each of these issues is presented below, along with a short explanation of the approach taken in this Draft Assessment.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |