| 9 Seafood for disposal
Comments that the wording in this clause implies that food must be labelled “returned”, “recalled”, or “unsafe” or “unsuitable”.
States that the outcome required is that food for disposal is not accidentally used, so questions why specify the different terms for a label. Some businesses have marked ‘quarantine’ areas – these would not technically comply.
10 Seafood Receipt
Comments that this clause implies that food is being received by the primary seafood business. A primary industry is one at the beginning of the chain. If a business is receiving food it is actually the second link in the chain not the first, and does not fall under the definition of primary producer in 3.1.1.
In addition, if food is received at 60°C or above it must have undergone substantial transformation. Therefore, the businesses would not satisfy the definition of primary producer.
- recommends that the clause be deleted.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
