| R4-021564 IPDL performance requirements (CR 484r1 to 25.133 R99) (Nokia)
The proposal from Nokia differs from Ericsson on the different window sizes considered, Nokia proposes 80 chips as the largest value, against +160 chips. Also Ericsson doubles the measurement period for the 80 chips window size, which is supported by Mitsubishi.
After off line discussions, Nokia and Ericsson agreed to produce a revised common CR with the +160 chips cell size removed
Decision: The CRs are revised
Edgar Fernandes (Motorola) questioned what would be the impact on the performance requirements if IPDL gaps and compress mode gaps are run in parallel. The serving cell measurement performance of an UE not supporting this feature would be affected, and these measurements are required for basic operation of the system, unlike the IPDL which is for an additional feature (positioning). Does the UE have to take into account the IPDL gaps in addition to the compress mode gaps, or they are overlapping? It has been shown that the impact of IPDL on bit rate is small, but on Edgar's view the impact on RRM has not been sufficiently evaluated. Ericsson and Nokia believe that the IPDL would not affect significantly the measurement performance of the UE.
Motorola proposed to add an statement in the general requirements to ensure that the terminals not supporting IPDL do not see its performance degraded due to the interaction of compress mode and IPDL. Such a compromise was agreed by Nokia and Ericsson, although David Chokroun (Nortel) objected to add restrictions to the IPDL or compress mode, but it seems possible that an agreement on the statement is reached off line.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
