Employability: the structuring concept for individualised almps for youth? Abstract



Yüklə 145,64 Kb.
səhifə3/3
tarix05.01.2018
ölçüsü145,64 Kb.
#37123
1   2   3
References
(EDS.), K. Mémento CPAS 2007, Kluwer.

BONOLI, G. 2010. The political economy of active labour market policy. RECOWE [Online].


BONVIN J.-M. & B., C. 2006. Les politiques locales de l’emploi, reflet des nouvelles logiques d’interventions publiques. État et régulation sociale comment penser la cohérence de l'intervention publique? Institut National d’Histoire de l’Art 2 rue Vivienne - 75002 Paris.
BONVIN, J.-M. & FARVAQUE, N. 2006. Promoting Capability for Work. The Role of Local Actors. In: S. DENEULIN, M. N., N. SAGOVSKY (ed.) The Capability Approach. Transforming Injust Structures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
BONVIN, J.-M. & FARVAQUE, N. 2007. A capability approach to individualised and tailor-made activation. In: BERKEL, R. V. & VALKENBURG, B. (eds.) Making it Personal: Individualising Activation Services in the EU. Bristol: Policy Press.
BORGHI, V. & BERKEL, R. V. 2007. Individualised service provision in an era of activation and new governance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27, 413-424.
BRODKIN, E. Z. 2011. Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations Under New Managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i253-i277.
BRUTTEL, O. & SOL, E. 2006. Work First as a European model? Evidence from Germany and the Netherlands. Policy & Politics, 34, 69-89.
CONSIDINE, M. & LEWIS 2010. Front-Line Work in Employment Services After Ten Years of New Public Management Reform: Governance and Activation in Australia, the Netherlands and the UK. European Journal of Social Security (EJSS), 12, 357-370.
CORTEEL, D. & ZIMMERMANN, B. 2007. Capacités et développement professionnel. Formation emploi, 98.
CRESPO, E., REVILLA, J. C. & SERRANO, A. 2009. Del gobierno del trabajo al gobierno de las voluntades: el caso de la activación. Psicoperspectivas, VIII, 82-101.
CRISP. 2012. Les aspects bruxellois de l'accord de réformes institutionnelles du 11 octobre 2011. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP [Online], 4.
DIF-PRADALIER, M., ROSENSTEIN, E. & BONVIN, J.-M. 2012. Vocational Training as an Integration Opportunity for Struggling Young Adults? A Swiss Case Study. Social Work and Society International Online Journal, 10.
DUMONT, D. 2010. La responsabilisation des personnes sans emploi en question - Une étude critique de la conctrualisation des prestations sociales en droit belge de l'assurance chômage et de l’aide sociale. PhD, Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis.
EICHHORST, W., KAUFMANN, O. & KONLE-SEIDL, R. 2008. Bringing the Jobless Into Work?: Experiences With Activation Schemes in Europe and the US, Springer.
EVERS, A., FORREITER, N., KOTLENGA, S. & SCHULZ, A. D. 2007. The emerging design of local labour market integration – elements and performance indicators. Gießen/Göttingen: Justus-Liebig-Universitaet Giessen/ZOOM.
FARVAQUE, N. 2002. Le déploiement local de l’action publique en faveur de l’insertion des jeunes : le rôle des dispositifs. Le cas d’une mission locale. Sens et portée de l’économie solidaire. Centre Auguste et Léon Walras –

Université Lumière - Lyon II.


FARVAQUE, N. & OLIVEAU, J.-B. 2004. L'insertion des jeunes peu diplômés dans l'emploi: opportunité de choix et contraintes. Document de travail Série Règles, Institutions, Conventions [Online], 04-11.
FARVAQUE, N. 2010. Evaluation du bien-être, développement humain et action publique locale - Un point de vue économique. Congrès annuel des secrétaires de CPAS.
FINN, D. 2000. Welfare to Work: the local dimension. Journal of European Social Policy, 10, 43-57.
GASPER, D. 2007. What is the capability approach?: Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 335-359.
GAZIER, B. 1999. Employability: Concepts and Policies. Berlin Institute for Applied Socioeconomics.

HAECHT, A. V. 2006. Fragmentation des compétences de l'Etat : le cas de la communauté française de Belgique. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 121, 341-352.


HAMZAOUI, M. 2003. La politique sociale différenciée et territorialisée : activation ou ebranlement du social ? Travail-Emploi-Formation, 4, 11-25.
JACOB, S. & GENARD, J.-L. 2011. La politique de l'emploi face aux nouveaux modes de gouvernance axés sur la coordination et la performance. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives, 77, 551-573.
LEFRESNE, F. 1999. Employability at the heart of the European employment strategy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 5, 460-480.
LEGRAIN, A., AUWERS, T. & ULENS, W. 2006. Evaluer les résultats d'une administration décentralisée dasn le cadre d'une rélation contractualisée: le cas de la sécurité sociale en Belgique. Politiques et management public, 24.
LESSMANN, O. & BONVIN, J.-M. 2011. Job-satisfaction in the Broader Framework of the Capability Approach. management revue. The International Review of Management Studies, 22, 84-99.
LINDSAY, C. & PASCUAL, A. S. 2009. New perspectives on employability and labour market policy: reflecting on key issues. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 951-957.
LINDSAY, C., MCQUAID, R. W. & DUTTON, M. 2008. Inter-agency Cooperation and New Approaches to Employability. Social Policy & Administration, 42, 715-732.

LINDSAY, C., MCQUAID, R. W. & DUTTON, M. 2007. New Approaches to Employability in the UK: Combining ‘Human Capital Development. Journal of Social Policy, 36, 539-560


LIPSKY, M. 2010. Street-level bureaucracy : dilemmas of the individual in public services, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
LØDEMEL, I. & TRICKEY, H. 2001. 'An Offer You Can't Refuse': Workfare in International Perspective, Policy Press.

MCDONALD, C. & MARSTON, G. 2005. Workfare as welfare: governing unemployment in the advanced liberal state. Critical Social Policy, 25.


MEYERS, M. K., GLASER, B. & DONALD, K. M. 1998. On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 1-22.
MICHEL, F. 2009. Quand s’activer devient la contrepartie du revenu d’assistance. Étude du Revenu d’intégration sociale (RIS) belge. Lien social et Politiques, 61, 37-48.
MUNCK, J. D. 2008. Qu'est-ce qu'une capacité? In: MUNCK, J. D. &

ZIMMERMANN, B. (eds.) La liberté au prisme des capacités. Amartya Sen au-delà du libéralisme. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.


NICAISE, I. 2002. The active welfare state: a response to social exclusion? Vives Lectures. Bruges.
NUSSBAUM, M. C. & SEN, A. 1993. The quality of life, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
PECK, J. & THEODORE, N. 2000. Beyond 'employability'. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, 729-749.
PÉRILLEUX, T. 2005. Se rendre désirable. L’employabilité dans l’Etat social actif et l’idéologie managériale. 1-18.
POHL, A. & WALTHER, A. 2007. Activating the disadvantaged. Variations in addressing youth transitions across Europe. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26, 533 - 553.
RAEYMAECKERS, P., NISEN, L., DIERCKX, D., MEZABI, D. C., VRANKEN, J. & CASMAN, M. T. 2009. L'activation au sein des CPAS belges - En enquête de parcours durables et de bonnes pratiques. OASeS; Université de Liège.
ROBEYNS, I. 2005. The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6, 93-117.
SAITO, M. 2003. Amartya Sen's Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37, 17-33.
SALAIS, R. 2010. La donnée n'est pas un donné Pour une analyse critique de l'évaluation chiffrée de la performance. Revue française d'administration publique, 3, 497-515.
SEN, A. 1990. Justice: Means versus Freedoms. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19, 111-121.
SEN, A. K. 1979. Equality of What? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values - Delivered at the Stanford University [Online]. Available: http://www.uv.es/~mperezs/intpoleco/Lecturcomp/Distribucion%20Crecimiento/Sen%20Equaliy%20of%20what.pdf [Accessed 26th July 2012].
SEN, K. A. 1999. Development As Freedom, Oxford University Press.
SIROVÁTKA, T. 2007. The individual approach in activation policy in the Czech Republic. In: VAN BERKEL, R., VALKENBURG, B (ed.) Making it personal. Individualising activation services in the EU. Bristol: The Policy Press.
STIGLITZ JE, S. A. A. F. J.-P. 2009. Rapport de la commission sur la mesure des performances économiques et du progrès social. Available: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_francais.pdf
SMITH, M. L. & SEWARD, C. 2009. The Relational Ontology of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Incorporating Social and Individual Causes. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10, 213-235.
VENDRAMIN, P. 2007. Les jeunes, le travail et l'emploi - Enquête auprès des Jeunes salariés en Belgique francophone.
VERD, J. M. & LÓPEZ, M. 2011. he Rewards of a Qualitative Approach to Life-Course Research. The Example of the Effects of Social Protection Policies on Career Paths Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12 Art. 15.


1 if outcome is understood as the combination of output with context In fact, having found a job is the result of the interaction between a (attained) personal state (e.g. quality and specificity of skills) and context situation (e.g. availability of job in that sector)

2 For a short overview of the main applications of the CA in different domain see Bussi andDahmen (2012)

3 Robeyns (2005) provides some examples of conversion factors: personal conversion factors are the metabolism, sex, intelligence, etc; social conversion factors include public policies, power relations, gender roles, and discriminating practices, etc; while environmental conversion factors can be identified, for instance, with the geographical location or the infrastructure facilities.

4 There are 19 CPAS in the Brussels Capital Region, the CPAS were selected according to two indicators produces by the Brussels Institute for Statistics and Analysis: the % of inhabitants aged between 18-64 living in the municipality who benefit from social assistance (2010), and the wealth index (2009). The interviews were conducted: in 1 CPAS with a wealth index of 70% compared to the national mean and with a share of recipients on social assistance higher than 5%; in 2 CPAS with a wealth index between 70 and 80% and with rate of socially assisted people between 3.5 and 4.6%; 2 CPAS with a wealth index between 85 and 105% and a poor population rate between 1.90 and 2.55% , and finally a CPAS with the highest wealth rate (more than 106%) and the lowest rate of poor (less than 1.9%). The idea informing this sampling was that the use of resources and tools by the is also, but not only, shaped by the workload and social situation of people living in that municipality.

5 The president is elected by the Council of the Social Action. This is composed by political delegates appointed by the Town council; they are thus indirectly elected by the citizens. The council of the social action manages the CPAS. The president cannot take any decision without the agreement of the Council. The council of the social action is renewed every six years when communal elections are scheduled. Normally the council delegates its powers to the committee of the social action which decides whether to grant the financial help or the permit for asylum-seekers. It is composed by the president and some social workers. The council of the social action is renewed every six years when communal elections are scheduled. http://www.ocmw-info-cpas.be/images/uploads_x/FV_le_cpas__Fr_.pdf

6 Most of the information reported is retrieved from the website dedicated to the CPAS in Belgium http://www.ocmw-info-cpas.be/index.php/inventaris_1_fr; from Memento CPAS (2007); and Dumont (2010). It is also important to acknowledge that since October last year, important changes in the regional and federal competences on employment and social issues (CRISP 2012)

7 Raeymaeckers et al (2009) report 6 phases of the activation path in the CPAS. However, the third (pre-training)/fourth (sheltered employment or training)/fifth (sheltered employment in the private sector) and sixth (orientation towards the PES) phase can be actually seen at the same level: all of these can be the final stage of the activation and normally are mutually exclusive: e.g. if a person is employed under the article 60 regime (sheltered employment) then not activation is done via sheltered employment in the private sector.

8 http://www.mi-is.be/sites/default/files/doc/OB%202002-09-06%20FR.pdf , accessed on the 20th July 2012

9 The action plan (projet individualisé d’intégration sociale) was already put into place in the years 90s in the framework of the political projet “programme d’urgence pour une société plus solidaire” (12 January 1993), but rarely and very differently adopted in the CPAS http://www.luttepauvrete.be/publications/RGP10ans/aide_socialeFR.pdf (accessed on the 20th July 2012)

10 For example CPAS discretionally chooses when exempting young people from being available to the labour market and allow them to follow some training; it also choose what kind of trainings people are entitled to opt for, until which age young people can go back to regular studies, or again if they have to work during school holidays. CPAS are free to organise their services and tools, they also normally have their own system of IT database.

11 The notion of employability in the Belgian social assistance does not appear as “employabilité”, more often found in political discourses, but as “socio-professional inclusion”. The latter was introduced in the 90s and strengthened in 2002.

12 The RIS is granted on a household means-tested basis. If an unemployed young person lives alone, she cannot ask for family allowances or help and her livelihood will be considered as non-sufficient, thus she will be entitled to the RIS.

13 We use here “employability” however it should be said that the term employability (“employabilité” in French) has rarely found an extensive use in official documents, especially referring to social assistance recipients. The phrase capacité d’insertion professionnelle (Van Haecht 2006; Lefresne 1999) has been preferred as translation of employability also in the guidelines for the European Employment strategy introduced with the Amsterdam Treaty (Périlleux 2005).

14 This is the author’s translation for “emploi adapté”; this is the legal definition of the employment that should be offered to social assistance recipients.

15 One operates within an area with high rate of children born in families without any income from labour is around 35% and the other in an area reporting a 10% (for 2007). Source: online data from the IBSA. http://www.monitoringdesquartiers.irisnet.be/

16 e.g. young people who have not worked yet and are “waiting” for unemployment benefit for students but do not have enough income and ask the CPAS for social assistance.

17 (for quantitative data on use of the art 60 by the Belgian CPAS see RAEYMAECKERS, P., et al. 2009)


Yüklə 145,64 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin