LGAs are a critical stakeholder group in the RAC disposal chain. Many State Governments and Territories have strategies in place to reduce waste sent to landfill (see Section 2.2). LGAs are responsible for the execution and management of these strategies for collection and disposal of household waste by:
Ensuring that undesirable environmental and social outcomes do not occur
Ensuring that useful resources do not end up in landfill
Extending the life of landfill sites.
LGAs are incentivised to divert RAC waste from landfill to reduce the burden on landfill sites.
A significant proportion of the WTS or landfill facilities are owned by LGAs. However, the operational control varies as it can either be controlled directly by the LGA or by a contractor on behalf of the LGA. A high percentage of recovered RAC is recycled by the LGAs.
Most LGAs offer households a kerbside bulky waste collection service (kerbside collection service or “on call” service). This service is not offered in the ACT, where householders have to transport the item to a depot or retailer. Industry stakeholders advised that RAC equipment can be disposed of at waste transfer stations (WTS) or landfill sites. Householders and service technicians tend to utilise this service.
Disposal costs
LGAs charge a gate fee for disposal of the RAC equipment and incur a cost for refrigerant recovery. Diverting RAC from landfill lowers waste management costs as it can extend the operating life of a landfill and generate an income from the sale of RAC items to metal recyclers.
Shredder floc is disposed of to landfill. Each State and Territory in Australia has some form of waste levy to encourage waste avoidance and resource recovery. There is some interstate movement of shredder floc from New South Wales to Queensland due to lower landfill fees that apply in Queensland. There is also evidence of shredder floc contributing to illegal dumping.
Data provided by the Department indicates landfill levies of between $40 and $50 per tonne in South Australia and Victoria; and $100 to $120 per tonne in New South Wales. The levy of $12 per cubic metre in Western Australia equates to about $30 per tonne. In Queensland, the waste levy was repealed on 1 July 2012 through an amendment to the Waste Reduction and Recycling Regulation 2011 to provide for a nil levy rate on all waste. The New South Wales Government has established a structural adjustment program to assist New South Wales metal shredders (NSW EPA, 2013)
Collection
The kerbside collection (also referred to as hard rubbish or verge) practice varies. Generally it involves either a controlled “on call” pick up service or a zoned collection period. The extent to which this is in place across all councils is unclear; however it appears to be common in urban LGAs. Industry participants reported that this pathway accounts for about 30% of refrigerators reaching end-of-life. Where these services do not operate, there is a greater chance the householder will take the RAC equipment to the local WTS, landfill sites, or illegally dump the item.
Split and ducted air conditioners are generally collected by service technicians or builders. Other RAC items (refrigerators, portables and window walls units, and evaporative air conditioners) tend to be disposed of through kerbside collection. Where LGAs perform the kerbside collection, the RAC items will be sent to WTS or landfill sites.
There was a strong theme across the stakeholder group that items left out for kerbside bulky waste collection will be scavenged for metal content prior to LGA pick up. There is no clear idea on the tonnage that this would amount to but it was considered to be significant compared to overall disposal. Industry participants reported that there is no recovery of refrigerant gases in this pathway, and that this pathway may represent 20% to 30% of refrigerators reaching end-of-life (or approximately 50% of the RAC equipment sent for kerbside collection).
Where LGAs have engaged contractors to collect and dispose of kerbside bulky waste it is common practice for the contractors to sell the RAC equipment to scrap metal yards or take the loads directly to shredders and recover the scrap value.
Disposal
Across the metropolitan sector, there was a strong representation of LGAs having contracts in place with scrap metal companies. For example, approximately 60% to 70% of LGAs across New South Wales have contracts with scrap metal companies to collect RAC equipment. At remote unmanned sites there is less control; however there were reports of rudimentary separation zones being provided.
At the WTS or landfill site, the operator separates and consolidates RAC equipment into a stockpile. The consolidated RAC is stripped into parts, stockpiled, or loaded directly into scrap metal bins. Ideally the RAC equipment is degassed before it is separated into parts or sold to the metal recyclers; however the level of degassing appears to be inconsistent across the sector.
Generally there will be a working stock of RAC equipment at different collection points (e.g. WTS) in collection areas or bins. When volumes are large enough to justify transportation of a full load, they are sold to metal recyclers (in some cases they collect their bins). In regional and remote locations, RAC volumes are lower and transportation costs are high. These factors diminish the returns from recovering the metal in RAC equipment.
Where the RAC is stripped into parts at the WTS or landfill site, the carcases are disposed of into landfill as well as to shredders.
Typical; supply chain costs reported by the industry are:
Storage costs are not a significant component of total cost in the RAC disposal chain. The scrap value of RAC equipment drives a high velocity in the disposal chain, from household disposal to shredding. Lack of ready access to “take back” schemes would lead to some temporary stockpiling in regional locations.
While a number of stakeholders mentioned that the distance of regional collection facilities from metropolitan recycling facilities, and the costs involved in transportation, would act as disincentives for recycling in regional areas; most of the stock of RAC equipment will be in metropolitan locations.
Refrigerant gas recovery
Stakeholders indicated that a high proportion of RAC equipment reaching LGAs contained refrigerant gas, possibly as much as 80% (based on number of RAC items, not gas volumes). Disposal (including degassing) of air conditioners appeared to be more controlled.
The extent to which degassing occurs at LGA facilities was not able to be precisely determined. Several LGAs reported that they degas refrigerators, but the practice did not seem to be embedded across all LGAs. The industry believes that coverage of degassing is high for the RAC equipment that is removed by service technicians (mainly air conditioners), but is 30% to 40% for other RAC equipment.
In discussions with a major retailer, and with a recycling company that collected refrigerant gases from retailers, it was noted that there was a high rate of recovery of refrigerant gases from retailers operating “take back” schemes. Discussions with LGAs indicated that recovery of refrigerant gases occurred about half the time. Industry organisations such as the Australian Refrigeration Council (ARC) report that there was likely to be a poor rate of recovery by scavengers, contractors, or scrap metal merchants.
Where degassing does occur, it is initiated by the operators of the WTS or landfill sites. Once the stockpile reaches a certain volume, the operators call a technician to carry out bulk degassing at the WTS / landfill site. Several LGAs reported having personnel trained to undertake degassing.
One New South Wales LGA placed the responsibility for degassing on the metal recycler through a provision in the contract to ensure the regulations were being followed.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |