Federal political system resolve the problem of premature dissolutions of government in

2.6.1 The Skills of a Comparativist 
The researcher is sufficiently well-informed to carry out a comparative law approach 
effectively for a number of reasons. First, he has a background in academic study 
of political systems, including that of the USA, so is able to guard against the 
problems of lack of deep level knowledge referred to in the initial paragraph of this 
63
Mark Van Hoecke, 'Methodology of Comparative Legal Research' (2015) Law and Method 1, 12. 
64
ibid 1. 
65
The term independent and separated is an indication of separation of powers. 
66
Mark Van Hoecke, 'Methodology of Comparative Legal Research' (2015) Law and Method 1, 9. 
67
Edward Eberle, 'The Method and Role of Comparative Law' (2009) 8(3) Washington University 
Global Studies Law Review 451, 457. 

---

21 
section. Second, he has not only studied the political system of Pakistan but is 
qualified to practise as a lawyer in that jurisdiction, providing a useful insider 
insight into not only the political system, but the functioning of the political system 
in that country. 
There are limits to comparativism.
68
Usually there is a risk that the lawyer 
attempting the comparison lacks a deep level of knowledge of culture specific 
concepts in one of the jurisdictions being studied and, as a result, has a 'culture 
deficit'.
69
This limitation has already been addressed in 2.3 whilst exploring the 
position of the researcher as insider and outsider. 
The researcher proposes a completely different political system, in order to address 
an on-going issue of political instability. With such a proposition, the researcher is 
aware of the fact that a thorough knowledge of the systems to be compared is 
required. It is a calculated risk that, if the two systems 'are socio-culturally and 
legal-culturally diverse, then more problems are likely to be encountered'.
70
Through a functional-institutional approach, an institution is highlighted to a 
comparable equation of two objects, then the next step is to determine '[h]ow is a 
specific social or legal problem, encountered both in society A and society B, 
resolved?'
71
This is to be achieved through a problem-solving approach. For 
instance, how is the issue of democratic federalism implemented in both countries? 
Schmitthoff argues that, 'the fact that the problem is one and the same warrants 
the comparability'.
72
In this thesis the 'problem' Schmitthoff refers to is interpreted 
and used as the subject of the comparative exercise, i.e. post-colonial history and 
similar state structure. 
With the help of the comparative law approach, the legal rules and patterns of a 
given polity are understood.
73
Whilst maintaining an impartial stance it is equally 
essential to understand a foreign culture, since its law really cannot be understood 
without this.
74
For example, in order to understand the US political system, it is 
68
Esin Orucu, 'Methodological Aspects of Comparative Law' (2006) 8(1) European Journal of Law 
Reform 29, 40. 
69
ibid. 
70
ibid 32. 
71
ibid 33. 
72
M Schmitthoff, 'The Science of Comparative Law' (1939) 7(1) The Cambridge Law Journal 94, 96. 
73
Edward Eberle, 'The Method and Role of Comparative Law' (2009) 8(3) Washington University 
Global Studies Law Review 451. 
74
ibid 458. 

---

22 
necessary to understand the influence of the Enlightenment on Republicanism on 
US constitutional law. This is discussed in Chapter 3.