Federal political system resolve the problem of premature dissolutions of government in

Document Outline

• Abstract
• Table of Statute and Legal Instruments
• Table of Cases
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Theoretical and Methodological Framework
  • 2.1 Ontology and Epistemology
  • 2.2 The Position of the Researcher
  • 2.3 The Researcher as both insider and outsider
  • 2.4 Methodologies and Methods
  • 2.5 Techniques used in the First Part of the Thesis
  • 2.6 Techniques used in the Second Part of the Thesis (Comparative Law)
    • 2.6.1 The Skills of a Comparativist
    • 2.6.2 Evaluating External Law
    • 2.6.3 Evaluating Internal Law
    • 2.6.4 Determining Comparative Observations
• 3. Literature Review
  • 3.1 Federalism
  • 3.2 Equal Representation
  • 3.3 Doctrine of Separation of Powers
  • 3.4 Doctrine of State Necessity
  • 3.5 State Structure
• 4. Constitutional, Historical and Political Background
  • 4.1 Launch of Federalism in British India
  • 4.2 History of Constitutional Instruments
  • 4.3 Testing against the key factors of a Democratic Federal Political System
    • 4.3.1 The Pre-Constitution Phase (1935 – 1956)
    • 4.3.2 The First Constitution (1956 – 1962)
    • 4.3.3 The Second Constitution (1962 – 1973)
    • 4.3.4 The Third Constitution (1973 – Present)
    • 4.3.5 Summary of the Test Results
• 5. A Comparative law inquiry into the USA and Pakistan Constitutional Systems
  • 5.1 The State Structure Analysis
    • 5.1.1 The USA
    • 5.1.2 Pakistan
  • 5.2 Government Structure – Legislative & Executive
    • 5.2.1 The USA
    • 5.2.2 Pakistan
  • 5.3 Government Structure – The Judiciary
    • 5.3.1 The USA
    • 5.3.2 Pakistan
  • 5.4 The key factors in the US context
• 6. Conclusion
  • 6.1 Researcher’s Contribution to Knowledge & Practice
    • 6.1.1 Contribution to knowledge
    • 6.1.2 Contribution to practice
  • 6.2 Recommendations for policy and future research.
• Appendix 1
• Bibliography