partner of Findlay, Hopkirk &
Co.
After things had settled down in America , some of our Virginians resumed
business there on a modest scale and the hogsheads rolled in once more
on Greenock or Port-Glasgow quay. But many of those who had ridden
the storm, the Dennistouns, Campbells, Bogles, Hamiltons - drifted into
the West India trade. Among them were Findlay, Hopkirk and
Company; and to this West India connection of theirs, their successors
owe their present hold of the sugar trade.
Both Robert Findlay and James Hopkirk left a tradition of public service
which their ancestors have faithfully kept up. ….To James Hopkirk, we
mainly owed besides other ?boons/ loons, the Barony Kirk, Norman’s
Barony, a thing of beauty which our tasteless age has swept away. In
1802, Robert Findlay died in the prime of life. The Hopkirks thereafter
retired and Findlay, Hopkirk and Company re-appeared as Findlay, Duff &
Co…. [Glasgow Herald 7.8.1893]
HOBKIRK & MILNE, 1794: were merchants at 68 Coleman Street, London [ex
1794 Directory of London and Westminster and borough of Southwark; citing Kent’s
Directory for the Year 1794]
HOBKIRK & MILNE, 1794: December 30: John Peter Hobkirk’s partnership with
Andrew Milne was dissolved; JPH took over the company on his own. [ex
London Gazette]
HOPKIRK: (MAUDE & Hopkirk), 1807: are opening a Wholesale Woollen
warehouse company in Glasgow in December, 1807 [Aberdeen Journal,
Aberdeen, Scotland, 13.1.1808]
HOPKIRK & RIDDELL, 1813: (Messrs): from W.S., Howe Street, Edinburgh
advertised for a large, furnished, country house for a genteel family, within
20 miles of Edinburgh. ? for themselves or someone else. [Caledonian
Mercury, Edinburgh, 27February 1813]
HOPKIRK & HILL (Messrs), 1816: of W.S. Edinburgh, to show applicants coal
fields for sale.[Caledonian Mercury 24 August 1816]
HOBKIRK, v HOBKIRK, 1816: March 18 law case re Adam Hobkirk [senior’s]
Will of 1809. Involved Mary Hobkirk (widow of Adam (senior), and mother
of Adam [junior], Samuel, William) [ref: C13/2496/15 ex A2A National Archives of
UK website] Listed incorrectly as HOLKIRK v HOLKIRK.
HOPKIRK & HILL (Messrs), 1817: were at W.S.2 Duke Street, Edinburgh.
[Caledonian Mercury 7 July 1817]
**HOBKIRK, v DAY, 1817: law case. [ref: C13/2505/18 ex A2A National Archives of UK
website] ? is this law case about William Hobkirk and/or his wife, who was
born as Jane Day. 3 bills
HOPKIRK, Cunningham & Co., 1818: merchants, exporters of cotton goods in
Glasgow and neighbourhood; signed petition / memo re excise duty. [ex
House of Commons Duties Payable on Printed Cotton Goods – evidence before Select
Committee, ex UK Parliamentary papers, on National Library of Australia special licensed
database]
HOBKIRK, v HOBKIRK, 1818: law case also re ?Adam (senior’s) Will. [Ref:
C13/2513/33 ex A2A National Archives of UK website]
HOPKIRK et al, v SCOTT, ?1818: Hopkirk sought damages of £19 in West
Indies on 19 November ?1825. [ex UK Parliamentary papers, on National
Library of Australia special licensed database; George IV Year 6]
HOPKIRK et al, v SCOTT, 1818: November 19: Was granted damages of £29
and costs. [ex 1825 First Report of Commissioners of ... [ex UK Parliamentary papers,
on National Library of Australia special licensed database]
HOPKIRK & Cunningham & Co., ?1818: manufacturers; interest = W.I. =
?West Indies;
HOPKIRK, v HYDE, 1821: Hopkirk sought damages of £513 on 19.7.1821 at
Grenada, West Indies. [ex UK Parliamentary papers, on National Library of
Australia special licensed database]
HOPKIRK, v HYDE, 1821, 1823: Hopkirk et al granted £513 and damages rated;
re Grenada judgment [ex 1825 first report of Commissioners of Inquiry re Grenada
Judgments; ex UK Parliamentary papers, on National Library of Australia special licensed
database]
HOPKIRK v Randolph, ?1824: law case mentioned in “The papers of John
Marshall: Correspondence, papers, and selected judicial opinion. January
1824-March 1827.
HOPKIRK, Cunningham & Co. (plaintiffs) v successors of Park & Orr. 1826:
16 October. Trinidad Report of H.M.’s Commissioner of Legal Inquiry on
Colony of Trinidad. [ex Trinidad Court Actions, Court of Chief Judge. UK
Parliamentary papers, on National Library of Australia special licensed database]
HOPKIRK: Geddes v Hopkirk, 1827: Law case of 2.6.1827 cited. [Caledonian
Mercury 18.6.1862]
HOPKIRK & IMLACH.(Messrs), 1831: Will provide particulars re the sale of a
genteel house. W.S.75 Great King Street [Caledonian Mercury 17.2.1831]
HOPKIRK & IMLACH.(Messrs), 1831: Will provide particulars re the letting of a
property including offices. W.S.75 Great King Street [Caledonian Mercury,
16.5.1831]
HOPKIRK, v Turnbull, 1833?: [really = Turnbull v Hopkirk] [ex 1867 Court of
Sessions, Scotland, UK Parliamentary papers, on National Library of Australia special
licensed database]
HOPKIRK & IMLACH.(Messrs), 1833: W.S., Edinburgh. Advertisement re a
?Court case. [Caledonian Mercury 20.6.1833]
HOPKIRK & IMLACH, 1834: W.S., were agents for the Faculty of Physicians
and Surgeons in a court case involving the University of Glasgow v
Faculty of Physicians and Surgeons, Glasgow. [Caledonian Mercury, Edinburgh
24.11.1834]
HOPKIRK, v TOD, 1835: This case is one of the cases that was listed as having
Awaited: summary cases: 8yrs 6 months in dependence. Glasgow. [ex
1835 Sheriffs, Scotland Returns; UK Parliamentary papers, on National Library of
Australia special licensed database; summary cases]
HOPKIRK & IMLACH, 1836: W.S., Advertisement at 12 Duke Street, Edinburgh
[Caledonian Mercury 4.8.1836]
HOPKIRK & IMLACH, 1837: W.S., Were agents in a court case [Caledonian
Mercury 2.2.1837]
HOPKIRK, & Imlach, 1837: writers at 12 Duke Street, [ex Scottish Post Office
Directories: Pigot & Co National Commercial Directory for the whole of Scotland and
of the Isle of Man, 1837]]
HOPKIRK, M’Caul & Co., 1837 or 1789: Were listed as tobacco merchant, at
the counting house, back of Mr. M’Caul’s lodgings, corner of Queen
Street. [ex Scottish Post Office Directories: Pigot & Co National Commercial
Directory for the whole of Scotland and of the Isle of Man, 1837 or ? Jones Directory
or Useful Pocket companion for the Year 1789]
HOPKIRK, Corcoran & Co., 1837: land transaction ? purchase for £200
University of Edinburgh [ex UK Parliamentary Papers, on National Library of
Australia special licensed database]
HOPKIRK v WALLACE & WATKINS, ~1839: June 4 in Scotland: [really = W&W
v Hopkirk] [ex UK Parliamentary papers, on National Library of Australia special
licensed database;
[HOBKIRK] STOCKMEYER, GRACIE, HOBKIRK & CO, ~1840s. = company in
early 1800’s in Brazil.
HOPKIRK v WALLACE & WATKINS, 1843: June 21, Court of Sessions, in
Scotland: [really = W&W v Hopkirk] [ex UK Parliamentary papers, on National
Library of Australia special licensed database];
HOPKIRK v Campbell, 1843: Scotland. + Wallace & Watkins v HOPKIRK
1843 (21.6.-28.6.1843+ 1.3.-4.3.1843; [ex UK Parliamentary papers, on National
Library of Australia special licensed database; 1844 Scotland Court of Sessions]
HOPKIRK, 1844: (Campbell & HOPKIRK), W.S. were agents in a court case
[Caledonian Mercury 21.3.1844]
HOPKIRK v BROWN or HAMILTON et al, 1846: Hopkirk = defendant; Appeals
and Writs of Error. P144. [ex Gen. Index to Journals of House of Lords; Vol LXV-
LXXXV; UK Parliamentary papers, on National Library of Australia special licensed
database]
HOPKIRK & FORSYTH, 1846: 41 Northumberland Street, Edinburgh = agents
for Globe Insurance Company [Caledonian Mercury 9.11.1846]
HOPKIRK & FORSYTH, 1848: W.S., 14 Northumberland Street, were agents
for Globe Insurance Company, Edinburgh and Leith, [Caledonian Mercury 23
March 1848]
HOPKIRK & Campbell v Neill & Coy, 1850: Appeal presented [p 717, ex UK
Parliamentary papers, on National Library of Australia special licensed database]
HOPKIRK & FORSYTH, 1851: Messrs., W.S., of Great King Street, Edinburgh,
were still listed as agents for the Globe Insurance Company [Caledonian
Mercury 29.9.1851]
HOBKIRK, Weetman & Co, 1851: of Rio de Janeiro. [also listed as Weedon in
Australia] = John Peter Hobkirk’ s company
This house suspended payment on 2.4.1851; its liabilities estimated at
480 contos of reis. The failure of one of the largest commercial houses in
Rio has thrown a gloom over the Praca, which it will take some time to
dissipate. … Unfortunate speculation in hides and foreign corn = causes
of this disaster; One of the members of the firm filled the office of
extensive stock and bill brokers render this failure of more consequence
than it would otherwise have been… Also discusses the “Medway” boat,
loaded with coffee arriving at Southampton. [ex Daily News” (London) dated
15.5.1851];
HOPKIRK [Hopkirk v Wilson, 1855: (law case of 21.12.1855) discussed in
another case [Caledonian Mercury, Edinburgh 4.3.1857]
HOPKIRK: DEANS & ROGERS v HOPKIRK, 1856: in law reports [Caledonian
Mercury 15.11.1856]
HOPKIRK: DEANS & ROGERS v HOPKIRK, 1856: in law reports [Caledonian
Mercury 20.12.1856]
HOLKIRK [Turnbull v Holkirk, 1864]: Action for solatium. 1864 June 18; and
reparation for the death of the pursuer’s sister; by whom he was partially
supported. Allegation: deceased caught death of cold, as a consequence
of her house being exposed to the weather whilst the landlord was in the
course of executive repairs on it. ? Holkirk = landlord; ? Turnbull did not
win his claim; [?google search]
HOBKIRK, SMITH & WHITECROSS, 1874: = Sunderland upholsterers [Leeds
Mercury 30.12.1874]
HOPKIRK, Messrs Hopkirk & Coy., 1883: Had an auction mart selling cattle
etc. at Coupar-Angus [Glasgow Herald 18.1.1883]
HOPKIRK, (Messrs. Hopkirk & Coy’s), 1884: “Coupar-Angus” company: they
appealed against their company’s valuation at the Valuation Appeal Court
[Aberdeen Weekly Journal 17.9.1884]
HOBKIRK & MARTIN, 1892: Were a firm of solicitors in Tasmania. Australia.
Actually = Martin and Hobkirk. Francis Charles Hobkirk seems to have
been a partner in this firm + ?William Martin. There are many Tasmanian
archives files on them. Some are listed below. E.g.
Re grant of land. File dated 1892 (18 October-20 October). [File Ref.
TRE1/1/2079]. + Request for the company, British and Foreign Marine Industry Co. be
allowed to commence business under the Foreign Companies Act. [file TRE1/1/2984,
dated 8.10.1898-14.10.1898] + ?Court case Messrs Martin & Hobkirk v The Tasmanian
Gold Mining and Quartz Crushing Co. (file no. 1596), found in file AE763/1/1209, dated
1.1.1904-31.12.1904] + Charles Connors v William Martin & Francis Charles Hobkirk –
stamp duty file 1687(in file AE763/1/1300)+ 9.5.1911-31.5.1911: M & H enquiry re title of
the Cluan School site].
[HOBKIRK] & MARTIN (should be Martin & Hobkirk), 1916: Solicitors at
Launceston, Tasmania, Australia; Advertised their property for sale, under
the terms of a Will of a Mr. R. Gardner. [Argus, 21.2.1916]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Some of the possibly related families of Hobkirk/Hopkirk
AGAR, … 1783: Lists names John, Solomon (John’s dad) and Susannah 1752-1836
(Solomon’s daughter) at St. Mary’s Whitechapel, London. [ex GeneaNet database]
AGAR, … 1813: January 14: aged 40, buried county of Somerset; place = Bath, St.
James. [ex National Burial Index, UK]
AGAR, Abraham 1680 = baptised; [Huguenot Society volume 26]; See Adam Hobkirk’s
entry re Agar also.
AGAR, Mary, (1761-1825): see National Burial index list I have printed off with > 20
entries.
AGAR, Hon. Mrs.? year: living at Cornwall, Lanhydrock. [ex Gentleman’s Magazine Library]
AGAR, Mary, 1739: December 29: Codicil to her Will included Jane Scarth’s children.
AGAR, Mary, 1740 - 1742: name on list of personal Wills, York. She was from York.
Vol. 87
AGAR, Mary, 1767: October 14: baptised at Hull, Yorkshire. Father = Edward AGAR.
AGAR, Mary, 1790: married Adam Hobkirk 1790 at York, St. Martin.
AGAR, Mary, 1790: married Adson (sic – yet card is clear, as Adam) Hobkirk 1790 at
York, St. Martin. Nil other information. [ex Pallot's magazine Index 1780-1837]
AGAR, Mary Ann, 1761: June 26: baptised at Westminster, London. Parents = James
AGAR & Mary.
AGAR, Samuel David, 1825: Was a cadet officer 1825; 2nd lieutenant 16.9.1825; 1st
lieutenant 31.5.1835; nil other information. [ex Bengal Officers list]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ATKINSON of Tasmania (who married a HOBKIRK)
ATKINSON, Emily Clara, 1877 – 1914: Correspondence is held by the National
Library, Australia. Documents state that she became Emily Clara
MASON. She was the youngest daughter of John Atkinson of High Street,
Launceston and “Illaroo”, St. Eonards, late Lieutenant 73rd Regiment, by
Jane Penelope, daughter of Thomas Reiby (Reibey) of Sydney,
Was married at St. Paul’s Church, Launceston, on 16 November 1865 to
the Revd. Alfred Nathaniel Mason, then incumbent of Carrick, later Rector
of St. John’s, New Town and Archdeacon of Hobart. Archival papers
found in the Australian Library Collections 9315124 about her, her son and
her tenants, written to Messrs. Weedon/Weetman?? and Hobkirk, 1880-
1914. Correspondence of Rev. A.N. Mason as trustee of Eliza Madden,
later Hobkirk, nee Atkinson’s marriage settlement 1877-1880. + the Will
of Eliza Hobkirk (formerly Madden), nee Atkinson with correspondence re
her affairs of 1896-1913.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHAMBERLAIN, Henry, 1796-1844: English artist; painted in Brazil. Details of him +
his painting were listed in [ex O Rio de Janeiro Visto pelos artistas franceses – A
presentacão do Gilberto Ferrez, Iconografial, p218 = Rio de Janeiro, seen by French artists –
presentation of.]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHAMBERLAIN, Lady: in April, [?which year] returned to Rio and some months
later, …. Back to ….; After the departure of Lady Chamberlain, I [?Frances
Mary Hobkirk, née Lecesne] lived almost all the time in St. Louis [=
plantation at Rio] with my sister Coralie, who had left … [ex Pioneiros da
cultura do café na era da independencia: a... by Gilberto FERREZ, pages ?? of 96
pages]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DAY, Arthur, 1861: Frances Sally DAY also involved with business of Thomas Day,
Louisa Jane Day, Arthur Day’s business, which partnership was dissolved on
26.12.1861.
DAY, C., 1838: Exhibited the following:
“View of Catholic Church of St. Edmund, lately erected at Bury, St. Edmunds”,
Suffolk. Page 44, item 1063;
“View of Catholic Church of St. Francis Xavier, now Erecting in Broad Street,
Hereford”. Item 1199.
“View of the New County Courts, Worcester, with the Lodges and Approaches as
complete” item 1177;
1838: Their home address = Living at Worcester, England.
[ex Exhibition of the Royal Academy of Arts, Great Britain 1838-1846]
DAY, Edward, 1799: cadet, Bengal Officers, India; 2nd lieutenant 15.11.1800; 1st
Lieutenant 22.8.1801; ?Captain 16.12.1814; Major 1.5.1824; Lieutenant Colonel
-
Retired 7.6.1830 in England.
DAY, E. Fitzgerald, 1819: cadet of artillery, Bengal Officers; 5.4.1837 Captain. Nil
other info.
DAY, Elizabeth, 1790: December 5: born; + 2.3.1790 born; baptised 4.1.1791 +
2.3.1790; Parents = John Day + Mary. Baptised at Westminster, London, St.
James.
DAY, F.S. (Miss), 1838-1846: Her address is listed [in Royal Society exhibition catalogue] as
41 Camden Street, Camden Town, London; Exhibited the following art pieces,
mostly miniatures or drawings:
1846: “The Corsair’s Bride” item 841; [corsair = Mediterranean privateer;
privateer = armed boat officered by private company, on commission from
government.
“A Portrait”, item 967, in 1846.
1845: “Portrait of a Lady”, item 817
“Portrait of 2 Young Ladies” item 715
“Portraits”, item 848;
“Portraits of a Gentleman” item 832, and
1844: “Portraits” item 832; +
1843: “Case containing 2 bracelet miniatures”, item 913;
“Portrait” item 902;
“Ali Ben NASSER, Envoy from His Highness Imaum of Muscat and
Mahomed Bedn HAMEES, his secretary”, item 847;
“Locket miniature”, item 781;
1842: still living at 41 Camden Street, Camden Town, London.
“Portrait of a Young Lady’ Item 925;
“A Case Containing 2 locket miniatures” item 901;
“Portrait” item 879;
“Portrait of a Russian Lady” item 767
1841: still at 41 Camden Street.
“Louisa” [drawing/miniature] item 935;
“ Portrait of a Gentleman” item 890
1839: still at 41 Camden Street.
“Portrait of Master Richard Mills” item 959;
“ Portrait of Miss Eliza Robinson” item 857;
“A Young Lady in the Character of a Flower Girl” item 826.
1838: Still at 41 Camden Street.
“ Corsair’s Bride” Item 841;
[ex Exhibition of the Royal Academy of Arts, Great Britain, 1838-1846] Refer also to T.S.
Day, H.S. Day, C. Day, R. Day (Junior) at same exhibition.
DAY, Frances Sally, 1816 – 1892: Born and died.
Portrait painter and photographer; daughter of Hamilton Smith Day. She
took 3 photos of Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg which were then painted by
Edward Corbould on 1.7.1862.
? also is the Miss F.S. Day and Miss T.S. Day, associated with portraits in 1838-
1846 Royal Academy exhibitions, including that of late Capt. Holkirk and her late
sister.
1840: started together in a business comprised of William, John, Joseph Day.
Lithography business in 1840’s. Photographed Queen Victoria and
Prince Albert; their business address = Messrs. Day, 14 Piccadilly, London.
Note: Frances Sally DAY, daughter of Hamilton Smith DAY also involved in
business. Frances Sally DAY also involved with business of Thomas Day, Louisa
Jane Day, Arthur Day’s business, which partnership was dissolved on
26.12.1861.
DAY, Francis, 1829 - 1889: born and died; ichthyologist, 3rd son of William Day. [full
text in ‘Dictionary of National Biography”]
DAY, George, 1830: Reverend; perpetuate curate at St. Peter’s, per Mountergate. [ex
Pigot’s Directory 1830]
DAY, Hamilton Smith, 1788 - 1870: born and died;
1788 January 24: born at Marylebone, Middlesex, London.
1788: March 12: baptised at Westminster, London, St. James.
His parents = John Day and Mary Day.
1813: June 21: married at St. Marylebone to Frances Rachael HOLLAND, both
of this parish. Witness = Elizabeth Day + ?
1841, 1851, 1861 censuses in UK. – listed on all.
1841 census: aged 50; at St. Pancras, borough Marylebone, parish of St. Pancras
at Camden.
Family: Frances R, aged 45 = wife;
Frances S. aged 25 = ?daughter;
Louisa aged 20;
William aged 20;
+ 8 more entries, ages ranging down to 2.
DAY, Hamilton Smith, 1851: census for England. Living at 41 Camden Street, London.
Born about 1788; born Marylebone, Middlesex, St. Pancras.
Wife = Frances R. Day;
Family listed as: Living in Camden Street.
Hamilton Smith Day, aged 63, portrait painter;
Frances R. aged 55;
Frances S aged 35, daughter, painter of miniatures;
Louisa J. aged 33;
May aged 28;
Emily aged 25;
Charlotte aged 22;
Thomas aged 19;
Arthur aged 18, a paint seller’s assistant;
Mary A. Smith aged 23, servant. [ex UK 1851 Census]
1861: was a portrait painter.
1870: ~March 22: died aged 82 at St. George, Hanover Square;
1870: March 22: buried at Highgate Cemetery of St. James, Swains Lane, St.
Pancras, Camden, whilst living at 46 Albermarle Street.
DAY, H.S. (Miss): 1845: address = 41 Camden Street, Camden Town. Items 309, 715,
817; but note: only item 309 (“Portrait of a Gentleman”) = H.S. Day; Nos. 715
and 817 = F.S. Day [ex Exhibition of the Royal Academy of Arts, Great Britain 1838-1846]
DAY, James, 1805: cadet Bengal Officers, India. 2nd lieutenant 8.4.1807; Captain
1.5.1824; Major 20.7.1832; nil other info. [ex Bengal Officers files]
DAY, Jane, 1780: baptised at St. Andrew, Holborn, London. Parents ??John & Mary
Day.
DAY, Jane, 1786: March 15:baptised at Tynemouth, Northallerton; parents = Mary and
Francis (dad). ? same as Hobkirk wife – doubtful, given consent of mother
needed for marriage.
DAY, Jane Grace , 1792: Born 5.10.1792 as Jane Grace DAY; baptised 28.10.1792 at St.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |