National IDB File Information (IDB Full Data Set)
1
|
Country
|
Denmark
|
2
|
Year
|
2011
|
3
|
National Register Name
|
National Patient Register (LPR)
|
4
|
Purpose of the register
|
Recording of hospital activity
|
5
|
Scope of the register
|
Only two hospitals are included, recording (nearly) the FDS
|
6
|
Data file name (FDS)
|
FDS2011.txt
|
7
|
Date of creation of FDS file
|
20130530
|
8
|
Range of data of attendance
|
20110101-20111231
|
9
|
Original coding dictionary
|
Data are recorded using the Danish classification for injury collection. Classification for 2011: http://www.ssi.dk/Sundhedsdataogit/Indberetning%20og%20patientregistrering/Patientregistrering/~/media/Indhold/DK%20-%20dansk/Sundhedsdata%20og%20it/NSF/Indberetning/patientregistrering/Skadesregistreing/Skaderegistrering_registreringsvejledning_2008_v1-3_marts2011.ashx
|
10
|
Dictionary modifications
|
Data are transcoded from the Danish classification shown above into FDS dictionary version September 2012. There are the following major deviations:
Violence and self-harm modules are not used. Date and time of injury are not recorded. Narratives are not recorded.
Minor deviations due to transcoding/lack of information exist, mainly resulting in non-existing codes, e.g. treatment & follow-up, codes 1,3,6; intent 4,5,8; Type of injury: 1(by definition);3 (not possible to separate from 2 or 4 using ICD-10)
|
11
|
(Eventual) Bridge coding applied
|
Transcoding from the Danish classification (modified NOMESCO version 4) into FDS is performed using SAS software and ICD-10 >FDS conversion table
|
12
|
No. of records in the data file
|
0062028
|
13
|
No. of FDS reference hospitals
|
2 hospitals
|
14
|
Geographic scope
|
Aahus area and western part of Copenhagen
|
15
|
Sampling of hospitals
|
Participation in a pilot study. Selection was based on regions (should be different) and previous experience. One hospital is the largest in Denmark including the most severe injuries, and one is a local hospital including mainly minor injuries. Rural areas may be under represented.
|
16
|
Sampling of cases within hospitals
|
All cases are recorded.
|
17
|
Data entry method
|
The recording is performed using the patient administrative system when the patient arrives; diagnoses are given by the doctors.
|
18
|
Percentage of admissions in data file
|
6.9%
|
19
|
Minimum Quality Control Checks
|
Yes,
|
20
|
Average percentage of “unknown”
|
Average ratio of no. of 9, 99, 999 in the 16 data elements recording county – mechanism of injury (except nature of injury 2, part of body injured 2)
Total: 9.5% including hospital code and activity, (15 items)
Recording country 0%
Provider/Hospital code – blank, not delivered (100%)
Record number 0%
Age 0%
Sex 0%
Permanent country of residence 0.4%
date att. 0%
Year att. 0%
Treatment & follow-up 0%
Injury1 2.1%
Part of body1 1.9%
Intent 5.4%
Place 8.6%
Mechanism 8.8%
Activity 15.8%
|
21
|
(Eventual) additional comments (for the user):
|
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark in collaboration with “Statens Serum Institut” (which collects the hospital data)
|
22
|
Responsible data administrator (organization)
|
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark in collaboration with “Statens Serum Institut” (which collects the hospital data)
|
23
|
Contact: Responsible person
|
Bjarne Laursen
bjla@sdu.dk
+45 6550 7776
|
24
|
Signature
|
|
25
|
Date of completion of this file
|
20130531
|