16.4%
19
|
Minimum Quality Control Checks
|
y
|
20
|
Average percentage of “unknown”
|
4.2%
17 data elements in Table 8.3D (Excluded: Type of injury 2, Part of body injured 2 and narrative).
|
21
|
(Eventual) additional comments (for the user):
|
Due to big regional differences some accidents are under/overestimated
|
22
|
Responsible data administrator (organization)
|
Socialstyrelsen, National Board of Health and Welfare
|
23
|
Contact: Responsible person
|
Pernilla Fagerström
Pernilla.fagerstrom@socialstyrelsen.se
National Board of Health and Welfare
Department of Statistics, Monitoring and Evaluation
S-106 30 Stockholm, Sweden
|
24
|
Signature
|
xxx
|
25
|
Date of completion of this file
|
2013-10-31
|
National IDB File Information (Full Data Set)
|
1
|
Country
|
Sweden
|
2
|
Year
|
2013
|
3
|
National Register Name
|
IDB Sweden
|
4
|
Purpose of the register
|
The main reason why collecting detailed data (IDB) on injury events is to supply statistics to anyone who deals with injury prevention, but also to supply statistical information to authorities which have a special responsibility on safety.
|
5
|
Scope of the register
|
One of the reporting regions has done some reorganization and therefore the reported accidents from that region have decreased in the past years. The catchment population hasn’t been changed.
|
6
|
Data file name (FDS)
|
IDB_Sweden_2013
|
7
|
Date of creation of FDS file
|
2014-08-25
|
8
|
Range of data of attendance
|
20130101 – 20131231
|
9
|
Original coding dictionary
|
NCECI 3
|
10
|
Dictionary modifications
|
The Swedish IDB data for 2013 is primary coded according to the NOMESCO classification on external causes if injuries. Thereafter translation to the AI IDB has been done.
|
11
|
(Eventual) Bridge coding applied
|
xxx
|
12
|
No. of records in the data file
|
53807
|
13
|
No. of FDS reference hospitals
|
6
|
14
|
Geographic scope
|
Entire country
|
15
|
Sampling of hospitals
|
The hospital sample is not a statistical sample, but more like a “convenience” sample. The hospitals have been chosen because of their own interest in collecting injury data mainly for use in local or regional injury prevention activities.
|
16
|
Sampling of cases within hospitals
|
All injuries treated at the ED’s of the participating hospitals are included in the IDB Sweden.
|
17
|
Data entry method
|
Patient Questionnaire: Paper/pencil
Medical information: Computerized hospital System
IDB data entry: Special developed data entry software
|
18
|
Percentage of admissions in data file
|
16.5%
|
19
|
Minimum Quality Control Checks
|
y
|
20
|
Average percentage of “unknown”
|
3.4%
17 data elements in Table 8.3D (Excluded: Type of injury 2, Part of body injured 2 and narrative).
|
21
|
(Eventual) additional comments (for the user):
|
Due to big regional differences some accidents are under/overestimated. The transport variables is coded or recoded by the National board of Health and Welfare. That leads to less good quality.
|
22
|
Responsible data administrator (organization)
|
Socialstyrelsen, National Board of Health and Welfare
|
23
|
Contact: Responsible person
|
Pernilla Fagerström
Pernilla.fagerstrom@socialstyrelsen.se
National Board of Health and Welfare
Department of Statistics and Comparisons
S-106 30 Stockholm, Sweden
|
24
|
Signature
|
xx
|
25
|
Date of completion of this file
|
20140825
|
