|
|
China
|
|
Col-ombia
|
|
Ghana
|
|
India
|
|
Indo-nesia
|
|
South Africa
|
|
Viet Nam
|
|
|
|
Target
June 2015
|
Actual
June 2015
|
Target
June 2015
|
Actual
June 2015
|
Target
June 2015
|
Actual
June 2015
|
Target
June 2015
|
Actual
June 2015
|
Target
June 2015
|
Actual
June 2015
|
Target
June 2015
|
Actual
June 2015
|
Target
June 2015
|
Actual
June 2015
|
|
Objective 1: Industry associations and training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Nr. of institutions embedding SCORE Training in their SMEs service portfolio
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
STSG
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
% of training cost covered by non-ILO resources
|
40
|
50
|
70
|
33
|
50% for M1
60% for M2-5
|
0% for M1
72% for M2-5
|
30
|
33
|
50% for M1,
0% for M2-5
|
50% for M1,
0% for M2-5
|
20
|
21
|
35
|
26
|
3
|
Nr. of national institutions or MNEs sponsoring/paying for SCORE
|
7
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
|
Output 1: sub-sectors and clusters with high decent job creation potential and strong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Nr. of clusters selected (geographic areas)
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
10
|
11
|
8
|
10
|
3
|
4
|
|
Output 2: Industry Association and training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Nr. of MoUs signed by IAs/training institutions
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
Nr. of reps of IAs/training institutions trained (M/F)
|
35 (60%F)
|
36 (56%F)
|
11 (30%)
|
11 (50%)
|
12 (30%F)
|
16 (31%F)
|
22 (10%F)
|
24 (13%F)
|
14 (30%F)
|
13(30%F)
|
3(30%)
|
12(50%)
|
50(33%F)
|
54 (31%F)
|
7
|
Nr. of business plans for SCORE Training developed by IAS/training institutions
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
Output 3: National capacity available to replicate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Nr. of national Expert Trainers available (m/f)
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3 (0%)
|
3
|
3
|
2(10%F)
|
0(0%F)
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
9
|
Presence of a national centre of excellence for SCORE
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
Objective 2: Service providers deliver effective
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
% of Modules delivered with medium or high independence
|
Medium: 70
High: 15
|
Medium: 71
High: 29
|
Medium: 50
High: 50
|
Medium: 63
High: 5
|
Medium: 50
High: 25
|
Medium: 33
High: 20
|
Medium: 65
High: 0
|
Medium: 73
High: 3.5
|
Medium: 50
High: 50
|
Medium: 50
High: 50
|
Medium: 30
High: 25
|
Low: 17
Medium: 3
|
Medium: 50
High: 25
|
|
|
Output 4: A locally adapted, gender-mainstreamed edition of the SCORE-training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Nr. of Modules gender-mainstreamed and adapted to sector and country
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
|
Output 5: SCORE M&E system established and up-to-date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Nr. of monthly/quarterly reports submitted on time
|
18
|
17
|
6
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
16
|
|
14
|
14
|
13
|
Nr. of imcomplete/incorrect data sheets in M&E database
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
|
Output 6: Service providers trained to deliver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Number of trainers certified in SCORE module 1 (m/f)
|
10 (60% F)
|
0
|
33 (30%F)
|
35(38%)
|
8 (11%F)
|
9 (11%)
|
12 (10%F)
|
12 (0%)
|
2(10%F)
|
0(10%F)
|
7
|
9
|
0(30%F)
|
0(0%F)
|
|
Output 7: SMEs trained on SCORE Modules 1-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Number of SMEs trained on Module 1 (M-owned/F-owned)
|
95 (10%F)
|
101 (12%F)
|
75(30%)
|
75(21%)
|
68 (25%)
|
81(12%)
|
65 (10%F)
|
74 (8%F)
|
153(15%F)
|
127(20%F)
|
50
|
58
|
75(30%F)
|
68(18%F)
|
16
|
% of SMEs taking up more than one module
|
30
|
57
|
30
|
16
|
30
|
33
|
50
|
51
|
30
|
24
|
30
|
24
|
30
|
38
|
17
|
% of participants rating training as good or very good
|
75
|
96
|
75
|
|
75
|
90
|
85
|
87
|
78
|
77
|
75
|
78
|
75
|
97
|
|
Immediate Objective 3: Increased awareness of responsible workplace practices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Nr. of partner initiatives promoting responsible workplace practices as a result of ILO awareness raising
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Output 8: Documentation and dissemination of good workplace practices is available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Nr. of case studies documented
|
16
|
16
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
8
|
10
|
8
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
7
|
9
|
20
|
Nr. of national disseminating events
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
|
Output 9: Policy makers, labour inspectors and social partners have increased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Nr. of policy makers, labour inspectors and social partners trained (not in ToT/E) (M/F)
|
300 (30%F)
|
309 (23%F)
|
15 (50%)
|
22 (63%)
|
21 (30%F)
|
26 (30%)
|
39 (10%F)
|
35 (17%)
|
60(30%F)
|
|
0
|
0
|
35(30%F)
|
30(31%F)
|
22
|
Nr. of NTAC meetings held
|
7
|
7
|
6
|
5
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* indicator 22 is defined within Colombia as nr. Of national project meetings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* indicator 20 was not given with Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** when a cell is blank in the original version '-' was stated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
