Important! Click to the test to see answers! Test test test test test test test 10 test 11 test 12 test 13 test 14 test 15 test 16 test 17 test 18 test 19 test



Yüklə 0,99 Mb.
səhifə51/244
tarix03.04.2023
ölçüsü0,99 Mb.
#124766
1   ...   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   ...   244
Explained answers (2)

Answer: prosecution.


1. It is difficult to attract students onto courses that do not focus on a career.


If this statement is true, you have to find a sentence in the text expressing the same idea. If this statement is false, you have to point out what is wrong with it and find a sentence in the passage given to correct it. However, we cannot find any reference like that. In the passage, there is no sentence telling us about difficulties in attracting students onto such courses. Therefore, the answer is Not given.




Answer: Not given.


1. The ‘Arson for Profit’ course would be useful for people intending to set fire to buildings.


Hence, “use the very same knowledge” means they can use what they have learned from this course (= this course would be useful for them). And “destructive, dangerous, reckless activity” can include “set fire to buildings.” Therefore, the answer is Yes.àIn section F, the author once again mentions the “Arson for Profit” course and writes: “As we have seen, someone could use the very same knowledge of means to achieve a much less noble end, such as personal profit via destructive, dangerous, reckless activity”. So




Answer: Yes.


1. Fire science courses are too academic to help people to be good at the job of firefighting.


In section B, the author relates the knowledge learned on the course to its usefulness for students who want to become firefighters. They will be qualified to do the job in a professional and expert way: “programs in fire science: they are highly welcome as part of the increasing professionalization of this and many other occupations”. The courses will help students. To be good at the job of = professionalization Therefore, the answer is No.


Answer: No.


1. The writer’s fire science students provided a detailed definition of the purpose of their studies.




In section F, the author asks the students about purpose of the course, “When I ask fire science students to articulate the end, or purpose, of their field, they eventually generalize to something like, ‘The safety and welfare of society,’ which seems right.” They only “generalize”, which means “to make a general statement or form a general opinion”. Their opinion is only general, not detailed or particularly clear. Therefore, the answer is No. Provide a detailed definition of = to articulate



Yüklə 0,99 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   ...   244




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin