and prosperity of the cities, give bread and employment to
thousands; we keep away from politics, gambling houses,
public offices, penitentiaries, and newspaper publicationswhat
else must we do to heal these petty scribblers from
their mad prejudice?” In 1965, Rabbi Maurice N. Eisendrath, the President of the
48th General Biennial Assembly of the Union of American
Hebrew Congregations, replied to the charge of ’Communistic
leanings’ hurled at the American Jewry, that it was not a crime
to criticise the foreign policy of the Administration. To seek a test
ban treaty, was once considered unpatriotic in America. But it
was finally adopted due to pressure of public opinion, was that
1:0 be a Communist? To oppose Multilateral Force, considered
lndispensable earlier, and now all but abandoned, is that being
a ’Communist’? The right of dissent, he emphasised, even in ill li 136 INDIA AMD ISRAEL CHAPTER 19 inconsequential as also in the church was a-prominent distinction
between dictatorship and democracy. As a religious Jewish
community, seeking justice, the Jews could not still their conscience
or muffle their voice, on issues they felt so strongly about. And
values, concern for Jews’ freedom and love for equality. He
exhorted, ”Why should we not make a crowning testimony to
the genius of our people by sending a Hebrew to Turkey? The
ignorance and superstition of medieval Europe may account for
the prejudices of that dark age. But how a Christian in our day
can turn from a jew I cannot imagine. Christianity itself sucked
at the bosom of Judaism, our roots are in the Old Testament.
We are Jews ourselves gone to blossom, and fruit. Christianity is ,^- n1fi JUDAISM AND JUSTICE 137 CHAPTER ’” i vm jn Evolution, and it would be strange for the seed to
against the stock on which it was grown.” Oscar Straus, the
)U lewish cabinet member under President Theodore Roosevelt,
an ardent supporter of President Wilson’s ideas of peace
fter war, which resulted in the covenant of the League of Nations.
As the Senate hesitated to permit the U.S. to join the League,
Salmon Levinson, a Jewish lawyer in Chicago, made out a case
in his publication The Outlawry of War which became the basis
of Kellogg-Briand Pact signed by fifteen nations at Paris in 1928.
After the arrival of Hitler when oppressions on Jews reached
unacceptable levels, the American Jewry petitioned the
Government to increase the quota of Jewish migrants from
Europe much higher than the earlier figure of 168,000. These
were not ordinary Jews, the poor huddled masses or wretched
refuse but the greatest flight of talent the world had ever seen.
These were scientists, musicians, artists, university professors and
twelve future Nobel Laureates.Then came the great World War.
national homeland for the Jews in Palestine . However, the actual 140 INDIA AND ISRAEL CHAPTER 11 struggle for Palestine began when the British drove out the Turks
from the fertile crescent, whereafter began three decades of
British mandate under the sanction of the League of Nations in
1921. The conflict with the Arabs, who were the existing residents,
was inevitable. The Israeli historian Yehoshua Porath states that
”In 1891 the leaders of the Muslim and Christian communities
in Jerusalem petitioned the sultanate to prohibit Jewish
immigration to Palestine and the purchase of land by the Jews.
Before the Turks withdrew they had warned the Palestinians and
the general Arab public that the British’ conquest meant Jewish
rule.” Ahad Ha- Am, a cultural Zionist, wrote a warning in 1891: ”We abroad have a way of thinking that Palestine today is
almost desert, uncultivated wilderness, and that anyone who
wishes to buy land there can do so to his heart’s content.
But that is not in fact the case. It is difficult to find any
uncultivated land anywhere in the country... We abroad
have a way of thinking that the Arabs are all savages, on a
level with the animals, and blind to what goes on around
them. But that is quite mistaken. The Arabs, specially the
townsmen, see through our activities in their country, and
our aims, but they keep silent and make no sign, because
for the present they anticipate no danger to their own future
from what we are about. But if the time should ever come
when our people have so far developed their life in Palestine
”--cramped, then they will not readily make way for us....”
How prophetic! The British policies from 1917 which had sown the seeds of
Arab-Jewish conflict bore its bitter fruit in 1948 when the State
of Israel came into being. While the ambivalent policies were
responsible to a certain extent, the real cause of their conflict
was a refusal of the Arabs to accept the existence of a Zionist
led Jewish nation on their soil. While the Zionists admitted to
settling into Palestine as many Jews as possible, Jerus’alen was
totally devastated during World War I, with famine and disease,
shortage of clean water, useable roads, and electrical breakdowns. THAPTW 11 ^HfSTRUGGLE AND THE HOME COMING 141 Even though the military Government did carry out essential
repairs and improvement works, foreign investment was the
^ain instrument for the reconstruction of the town. Tourism
and pilgrim trade revitalised the economy of Jerusalem as new
schools and libraries were opened along with the centres for
learning. Many churches were constructed. Hadassah Hospital
came up on Mount Scopus along with the Jewish National Library
and later the Hebrew University in 1925. The posh King David
Hotel was built in 1930 and the flurry of construction activity
continued with the construction of the American colony and
Sheikh Jarrah east of Jerusalem. The new Jewish developments
came up in the western part of the city: Romemah (1921),
Shmuel (1928), Ceula (1929), and Tel Arza (1931). Beit Hakerem
was the first suburban settlement constructed in 1923 on the
western edge of Jerusalem. The British tilt towards the Arabs
resulted in the construction of large number of Arab churches,
mostly of Anglican adherents. There were also churches of
different countries. By the end of it all the British Administration
left a reasonable, liveable and well-developed Jerusalem. The
British ambivalence and contradictory promises to Arabs and
Jews made their positions in the Middle East in 1917 untenable.
France and Britain divided the spoils of the lands vacated by the
Turks into their areas of influence; France opting for Lebanon
and Syria and the British for Egypt and Palestine. As a result of
the Sykes-Picot Agreement of May 1916, the map of Middle
East was redrawn as stated above with Russia having some areas
°f influence. It was this secret agreement that allowed Britain to
be given its mandatory power over Palestine by the League of
Nations. As Syria was cheated of its dreams of expansion and
a Greater Syria, King Hussein of Jordan too was short-changed
’n Transjordan and western Palestine. It was a no-win situation
Or the British as the creation of an Emirate in Transjordan in
y2Q infuriated the Zionists, who considered this action as a
p^rayal to the cause of their national home in the whole of
Palestine, which to them included Transjordan and western alestine as well. The Balfour declaration of November 2,1917
read: 142 IHDIA AND ISRAEL CHAPTER 1 -\ ”His Majesty’s Government view with favour the
establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish
people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the
achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that
nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and
religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine
or the rights and political status enjoyed by jews in any
other country.” This Declaration was not entirely philanthropic in content,
since there was a political percentage attached to it as explained
by Eugene Bovis in the following words: ” Some British statesmen came to believe that, if given a chance, many jews would flock to Palestine after the war to
settle and that if Great Britain supported the idea of a Jewish
national home in Palestine, it might be able to establish a
British protectorate over the country, thus assuring exclusive
British control rather than international control. The Balfour
Declaration would thus give moral weight to a British claim
to be the protecting power, just as the military conquest
then in progress would give the British claim a material basis.”
There had been many waves of immigration into Eretz Israel
called ’Aliyas.’ Mention has been made of the First Aliya consisting
of the founding fathers who on arrival bought land and settled
in various parts of Palestine. The second wave or Aliya was a
result of the abortive Russian revolution of 1905 and the bloody
pogroms that followed.. The dislocations caused by the 1st World
War and the conclusion of the Russian revolution as also the
Balfour Declaration of 1917, turned the earlier trickle into a tide
which formed the^core of the Third Aliya. The immigrants of the
third wave came mostly from eastern Europe and Russia, totaling
about 35,000, mostly men and women in their early 20s,
passionately inspired by an anti-authoritarian idealism to which
formal Government was an anathema. The new settlements
called ”chalutzim” were to be voluntary establishments t°r
communes of the like-minded democratic enthusiasts. These
ideas of the young minds soon evaporated into hard realit’65
due to the need for discipline and cooperation. The credo °