| A. Oral presentations
The oral presentations should be evaluated on following counts :
1. Quality of work
2. Presentation
3. Illustrations
4. Discussion of the paper
5. Time
1. Quality of Work : The scientific quality of work should be judged on following grounds :
a. Nature of Enquiry : This should be assessed as follows : has the student addressed himself/herself to a logical question on the basis of existing information or alternatively just any problem has been taken for the sake of experimentation ? Is the enqiry justified in view of existing results and have the right questions been asked ?
b. Planning and Execution of Experiments : The evaluation should be on following counts are the experiments properly planned and executed ? Does the plan of experiments lead to understanding of the questions asked ? Are proper controls kept ? Do the techniques used have sensitivity to provide information sought ? Have right chemicals/reagents been used ?
c. Results of Experiments : Do the results obtained provide sufficient information to justify the conclusions drawn ?Is the interpretation right and are the results properly analyzed ? (e.g. carrying out of a statistical analysis does not necessarily mean that results have been properly analyzed)
d. Discussion : The results should be discussed well in the light of existing information. No unjustified claims should be made. Hypothesizing may be encouraged but far-fetched relationships are to be discouraged.
Dostları ilə paylaş: | 
