International organisation for standardisation organisation internationale de normalisation


Summary of discussions 39.4Action Points



Yüklə 7,43 Mb.
səhifə38/105
tarix03.11.2017
ölçüsü7,43 Mb.
#29078
1   ...   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   ...   105

39.3Summary of discussions



39.4Action Points



40.Exploration

40.1Topics

40.1.1Uniform Timeline Alignment

40.2Contributions





Number

Session

Title

Source

Dispositions
















































40.3Summary of discussions




40.4Action Points


41.Liaison

41.1List of input liaison letters





number

Session

Title

Source

Reponse

m32760

Liaison

IEC CD 60728-101

IEC TC 100 via SC 29 Secretariat

None

m32761

Liaison

IEC NP: Digital Television Accessibility - Functional Specifications

IEC TC 100 via SC 29 Secretariat

None

m32762

Liaison

IEC CDV 62087-1, 62087-2, 62087-3, 62087-4, 62087-5 and 62481-6

IEC TC 100 via SC 29 Secretariat

None

m32764

Liaison

IEC TR 62921 Ed.1

IEC TC 100 via SC 29 Secretariat

None

m32765

Liaison

Liaison Statement from IETF

IETF via SC 29 Secretariat

None

m32766

Liaison

Liaison Statement from 3GPP

3GPP via SC 29 Secretariat

W14368

m32926

Liaison

Liaison Statement from EBU

EBU via SC 29 Secretariat

w14367

m32927

Liaison

Liaison Statement from SC 34

SC 34 via SC 29 Secretariat

W14380

m33096

Liaison

Liaison Statement from EBU

EBU via SC 29 Secretariat

W14373

m33175

Liaison

Liaison Statement on ISO/IEC 13818-1:2013/Amd.6: Delivery of Timeline for External Data

DVB

W14372

m33183

Liaison

Liaison Statement on Uniform Signalling for Timeline Alignment

DVB

W14374

m33290

Liaison

DASH-IF liaison to MPEG

irajs@microsoft.com, Iraj Sodagar (on behalf of DASH-IF)

W14370

m33373

Liaison

Liaison Statement from DVB

DVB via SC 29 Secretariat

W14369

m33437

Liaison

ATSC Liaison to MPEG on DTS values for MVC

Walt Husak

Anthony Vetro



W14375

m33485

Liaison

ATSC Liaison on MMT

Walt Husak

W14376

m33486

Liaison

Liaison Statement from BDA

BDA via SC 29 Secretariat

none


41.1.1m33290 DASH-IF liaison to MPEG


We think defining a track to carry these SEIs and extracting them from the video is the best low-intrusion solution, but converting them to a more modern format should be considered. If the SEIs position needs to be recorded, we would suggest looking at Extractors. The track timing could be copied from the video track (including re-ordering) or simplified to be in presentation order.

We could certainly add to 23001-7 section 11 a part that has a small schema and namespace for representing PSSH boxes in XML. Contributions welcome.


Summary:

  • Issue 3: Accuracy of Segment timeline when $Number$ used. No accuracy needed because it is overkill and the client doesn’t need to know the exact duration of the segment.

  • Issue 5:

5.1 Do clients reliably support parsing the emsg and act accordingly? Should it be required in a profile? Is notification of event schemes in an EventStream element in the initial MPD sufficient?

      • Response: Yes. It will be added to the new profile. So it’s Amd1 issue.

5.2 For DASH events using value=2, there are some open questions. In order to use this box, does the client have to apply the patch operation or can it fall back to value 1? How does the client know to which MPD this patch is the difference?

  • Response: Add the MPD publish time as a separate field. Accepted. Alex will provide the text.

5.3 We believe that for computing the URL using the $TIME$, a consistent requirement is necessary to either use the segment index or if the tfdt is used, that tfdt is equal to presentation time.

  • COR1 clearly indicates how to calculate the timing of each media segment.

5.4 Running through all details we identified that it is not clear how the buffering parameters: minBufferTime, suggestedPresentationDelay. We encourage MPEG to clarify their meaning in order to ensure interoperable implementations.

  • Response: Agree that the names are not the best choices. We encourage receiving contributions for Part 3 to clarify the use of these parameters.

    1. There was a very specific question on how Segment Timeline and Segment gaps work for live services. How can the client know when it can restart? We believe some clarification is needed.

  • Response: Agree. We need to clarify whether Segment Timeline can signal gaps with unknown duration. It will be captured in DuI and will be addressed by contribution.


41.1.2m32926 Liaison Statement from EBU


Thank you. The decoder behavior in fault situations (e.g. late arrival of media data) is out of scope of our specification, but your option 2 seems reasonable. We note that MP4Box (among other tools) supports 14496-30. Into the liaison to EBU.

41.1.3m32766 Liaison Statement from 3GPP


Disposition: Accepted. To be included in DuI.

Summary: remove “or more” from the SegmentList in the 23009-1 text (or any place that indicates multiple SegmentList can be used) since the schema only allows one.



41.1.4m33373 Liaison Statement from DVB


Disposition: Partially Accepted.

  • Respond to DVB that if p is not used, the t is from the beginning of the MPD.

  • Add an explanation and two examples to DuI.

Summary: The MPD anchor parameter p is not needed and DVB plans to remove it.

Recommendation: Clarify the text by adding example and explanation.




Yüklə 7,43 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   ...   105




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin