A Video subgroup plenary was held 11:00-12:00 on Wednesday. Reports of BoGs were given. In CDVS, work was ongoing, and nothing substantial needed to be discussed. Video related issues of RMC were presented and discussed (see sec. 9). For the video codec comparison, the first round of “experts viewing” (with three people who actually were non-video-experts) did not provide meaningful results, since the votes were too much diverging. It was agreed to arrange another round Wednesday afternoon with a total of 12 (now video) experts. Following the video plenary, more discussion was performed about this arrangement and how to evaluate the results (see sec. 5).
