3.4Action Points 4MPEG-4 Conformance (14496-4) 4.1Topics 4.1.1ISO/IEC 14496-4:2004 AMD 40 ExtendedCore2D profile conformance
4.2Contributions
Number
|
Session
|
Title
|
Source
|
Dispositions
|
m20328
|
Scene
|
Summary of Voting on ISO/IEC 14496-4:2004/DAM 40
|
SC 29 Secretariat
|
None
|
4.3Summary of discussions
4.4Action Points
5MPEG-4 Reference Software (14496-5) 5.1Topics 5.1.1ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001 AMD 29 Reference software for PMSI for LASeR 5.1.2ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001 AMD 30 ExtendedCore2D profile reference software
5.2Contributions
Number
|
Session
|
Title
|
Source
|
Dispositions
|
m20329
|
Scene
|
Summary of Voting on ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/DAM 29
|
SC 29 Secretariat
|
Accepted
N12118
|
m20333
|
Scene
|
Summary of Voting on ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/DAM 30
|
SC 29 Secretariat
|
Accpted
N12119
N12120
|
5.3Summary of discussions
5.4Action Points
6MPEG-4 BIFS (14496-11) 6.1Topics 6.1.1Exploration -
Remote and Collaborative work
6.2Contributions
Number
|
Session
|
Title
|
Source
|
Dispositions
|
m21161
|
Scene
|
Use Cases for Collaborative Applications
|
Jamie MARSHALL, Mihai MITREA, Bojan JOVESKI, Francoise PRETEUX
|
Accepted
N12208
|
m21162
|
Scene
|
Draft Context and Objectives for MPEG Scene Technology with Collaborative Applications
|
Jamie MARSHALL, Mihai MITREA, Bojan JOVESKI, Ludovico GARDENGHI, Francoise PRETEUX
|
Accepted
N12207
|
m21163
|
Scene
|
Draft Requirements on MPEG Scene Technology for Collaborative Applications
|
Jamie MARSHALL, Mihai MITREA, Bojan JOVESKI, Ludovico GARDENGHI, Francoise PRETEUX
|
Accepted
N12206
|
m21164
|
Scene
|
Draft Call for Proposals for Scene Technologies for Collaborative Applications
|
Jamie MARSHALL, Mihai MITREA, Bojan JOVESKI, Ludovico GARDENGHI, Francoise PRETEUX
|
Accepted
N12209
|
m21165
|
Scene
|
Collaboration Technology Mandate Report: Cross-media collaboration
|
Bojan JOVESKI, Ludovico GARDENGHI, Mihai MITREA, Rama Rao Ganji, Iain James MARSHALL, Françoise PRETEUX
|
Noted
|
6.3Summary of discussions
m21165
demonstration of a new framework enabling cross-media collaboration, i.e. allowing users to collaborate within the same scene but using different types of media (BIFS vs. LASeR)
This application needs a standardized “hook” to convey information for collaborative client (similar to video decoder) and format for generalized description to be conveyed.
This could be a good item for application format standard.
6.4Action Points 7MPEG-4 ISO Base File Format (14496-12) 7.1Topics 7.1.1ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008/AMD 2 Support for sub-track selection & switching, post-decoder requirements, and color information 7.1.2ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008/AMD 3 DASH support and RTP reception hint track processing 7.1.3ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008/AMD 4 MP4 files as a playlist using file tracks
7.2Contributions
Number
|
Session
|
Title
|
Source
|
Dispositions
|
m21319
|
File Format
|
ISOBMFF: Comments on FPDAM2.2
|
Miska M. Hannuksela
|
Deferred
|
m21321
|
File Format
|
On Movie Fragments and Edit Lists, for 14496-12 (ISO Base Media File Format)
|
David Singer
|
accepted
N12124
N12125
|
m21327
|
File Format
|
Clarifying Random Access Points and Sync Samples in the file format
|
David Singer
|
Deferred
|
m21136
|
File Format
|
ISOBMFF: Controlling Sample Timing in Fragmented Files
|
Miska M. Hannuksela
|
Accepted
N12124
N12125
|
m20400
|
File Format
|
DASH: Representation timeline alignment for ISO BMFF
|
Mark Watson
|
Accepted
N12124
N12125
|
m21272
|
File Format
|
Two minor issues with movie fragments in the Part 12 format
|
David Singer
|
Accepted
N12124
N12125
|
m20334
|
File Format
|
Summary of Voting on ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008/DAM 3 & ISO/IEC 15444-12:2008/DAM 3
|
SC 29 Secretariat
|
Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Sweden, UK, USA
|
m21144
|
File Format
|
ISOBMFF: Support for incomplete tracks
|
Miska M. Hannuksela
|
Accepted
N12126
|
m21145
|
File Format
|
ISOBMFF: Editorial update of Annex H of DAM3
|
Miska M. Hannuksela
|
Accepted
N12124
N12125
|
m21121
|
File Format
|
ISO base media file format: 'stdp' box
|
Ye-Kui Wang
|
Accepted
N12124
N12125
|
m21201
|
File Format
|
Proposed update to ISO/IEC 14496-12 ISO base media file format applying 32bit indexing for itemID and item_count
|
Noboru Harada, Takehiro Moriya, Yutaka Kamamoto,
|
Accepted
N12126
|
m21296
|
File Format
|
File Format – on stereoscopic video indication
|
Jaeyeon Song, Sungryeul Rhyu, Kyungmo Stanley Park, Kwang-Cheol Choi, Gun-Ill Lee, Kyuheon Kim, Jangwon Lee
|
Deferred
|
m21359
|
File Format
|
On M2TS compression as file format hint track
|
Waqar Zia, Alex Kyungho Kim
|
Accepted
N12126
|
m20430
|
File Format
|
Extend ISO/IEC File Format with Error Correction for Multimedia Preservation
|
Walter Allasia, Wo Chang
|
Deferred
|
m21096
|
DASH
|
DASH: Indication of Subsegments Starting with SAP
|
Miska M. Hannuksela, Ye-Kui Wang
|
Accepted
N12124
N12125
|
m21435
|
|
ISOBMFF: SAP definitions and 'sidx' box Miska M. Hannuksela
|
ISOBMFF: SAP definitions and 'sidx' box Miska M. Hannuksela
|
Accepted
N12124
N12125
|
7.3Summary of discussions
m21321
Accepted in general; allow in the file format the edit that establishes the mapping, ensure that the segment index talks about times after this correction, and say here it is mapping a composition time to the initial presentation time, and it is ‘typically’ the composition time of the first frame that is mapped to 0. This also works for audio; make sure the write-up applies to the AAC pre-roll case. Editors to check that the movie fragment case of audio is no longer commented as unsupported.
m21096
We agree to add an annex “SAP type definitions” to the file format and remove it from DASH.
We will try to provide at least a short definition of each field, and then simplify the table as much as possible (e.g. maybe some lines can be merged, ideally losing the reference_type column). We make sure that the ‘presentation times’ are after the adjustment of any edit list in the movie box.
We also need the DASH edits (which are in 20339). We need a revision of this into systems plenary, that integrates these changes and the DASH-revised base text. (See m21435, below).
m20400
Thank you, the sentence inserted and the edit list is covered by another contribution.
m21121
Thank you, accepted in general. Editors to integrate multiple contributions on the same topic.
m21272
Thank you, accepted in general. Editors to integrate multiple contributions on the same topic. We do not make the stipulation that tracks are consistent.
m21136
-
It proposes enabling of signed composition time offsets in the Track Run box. [[done]]
-
It is clarified that the Composition to Decode box applies only to the initial movie and not the movie fragments following. [[ok, accepted into this amendment]]
-
A Track Extension Properties (‘trep’) is proposed to be optionally included in the Movie Extends box. The ‘trep’ box can be used to document or summarize characteristics of the track in the subsequent movie fragments. It may contain any number of child boxes.[[accepted into amendment 4]]
-
It is proposed that the Composition to Decode box may also appear in the Track Extension Properties box and then documents all the following movie fragments of the track.[[ok, but make 0 for composition end time be unknown? into amendment 4]]
-
Amendment 3 allows Sample Group Description boxes in Track Fragment boxes. Consequently, a client can no longer rely on the sample group description entries in the Movie box to describe the sample grouping of entire presentation including movie fragments. Alternative Startup Sequence Properties (‘assp’) box is therefore proposed to be included in Track Extension Properties box to summarize the characteristics of sample group description entries that may be expected to appear within track fragments for alternative startups sequence sample groups.[[also into amendment 4]]
-
Now that the 'rap ' sample grouping is introduced for indicating open GOP random access points in Amendment 3, it is proposed that the alternative startup sequence sample grouping may also be used in conjunction with random access points indicated by the 'rap ' sample grouping.[[accepted into this amendment]]
m21144
Accepted into amendment 4.
m21145
Accepted without presentation. Thank you.
m21435
Thank you. We need careful choice of terms in the introduction to the SAP types; editors to work on that, visibly on the mailing list. Where SAP Types are used, clarify that all other values are reserved. A number of editorial/phrasing issues were raised, which will be handled by the editor(s).
m21201
Thank you. We agree to start an amendment 4 at this meeting. We will update all the item_ID, including the flute hint track ones, for consistency. We can handle item references with something like the following:
aligned(8) class SingleItemTypeReferenceBox(referenceType) extends Box(referenceType) {
unsigned int(16) from_item_ID;
unsigned int(16) reference_count;
for (j=0; junsigned int(16) to_item_ID;
}
}
aligned(8) class SingleItemTypeReferenceBoxLarge(referenceType) extends Box(referenceType) {
unsigned int(32) from_item_ID;
unsigned int(16) reference_count;
for (j=0; junsigned int(32) to_item_ID;
}
}
aligned(8) class ItemReferenceBox extends FullBox(‘iref’, version, 0) {
if (version==0)
{ SingleItemTypeReferenceBox references[]; }
else if (version==1)
{ SingleItemTypeReferenceBoxLarge references[]; }
}
m21359
We like the idea; we take it into amendment 4. Experts to work together to resolve/improve the design and provide text for amendment 4 initial version.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |