It is heartening that National Assessment and Accreditation Council (naac) has brought in new spirit into its process of assessment and accreditation


(May be verified from DCF of AISHE)



Yüklə 2,16 Mb.
səhifə87/107
tarix09.01.2022
ölçüsü2,16 Mb.
#93026
1   ...   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   ...   107
(May be verified from DCF of AISHE)

*Random check of the application on form of foreign students (5%)






10.

2.1.2 Demand Ratio (Average of last five years) (4)

Programme name

Programme Code

Number of seats available / sanctioned

Number of eligible applications received

Number of students admitted
















Documents:

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.




11.

2.1.3 Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years (3)

Year

Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI or State Government rule

Number of students admitted from the reserved category

 

SC

ST

OBC

Gen

Others

SC

ST

OBC

Gen

Others


































Documents:

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.

(May be verified by DCF of AISHE.)

*Random check for at least 5% of the students.









Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity (20)

12.

2.2.3 Percentage of differently abled students (Divyangjan) on rolls (5) (current year data)

Name of the student enrolled under Differently abled Category

Gender

UDID Card Number

Type of Disability

Percentage of Disability

Program enrolled

Year of Enrolment






















Documents:

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.

  • List of differently abled students.

  • Any other document submitted by the Institution to a Government agency giving this information.

(May be verified from DCF of AISHE)







Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching- learning Process (20)

13.

2.3.2 Percentage of teachers using ICT for effective teaching with Learning Management Systems (LMS), E-learning resources etc. (5)

Number of teachers using ICT (LMS, e-Resources)

ICT tools and resources available

Number of ICT enabled classrooms with class room number

Number of smart classrooms with class room number

E-resources and techniques used

Link of the relevant documents




Documents:

  • List of teachers using ICT.

  • LMS website/ Academic management system.

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.






Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (50)




14.

2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years (10) & for

2.4.3 Teaching experience of full time teachers in number of years (10)



Name of the Full-time teacher

PAN

Designation

No. of sanctioned posts

Year of appointment

Name of the Department


Total years of Experience



Is the teacher still serving the institution/If not last year of the service of Faculty to the Institution


























Documents:

  • Positions sanction letters by competent authority.

  • Upload appointment letters of faculty during last five years.

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.

(May be verified from DCF of AISHE)



15.

2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D. during the last five years (10)

Name of full time teachers with PhD

Year of obtaining PhD

Whether recognised as research Guide for ph.D

Year of Recognition as Research Guide














Documents:

Institutional data in prescribed format.




16.

2.4.4 Average percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowships at State, National, International level from Government, recognised bodies during the last five years (10) & for

3.4.2 The institution provides incentives to teachers who receive state, national and international recognition/awards (1)



Name of full time teachers receiving awards from state level, national level, international level

Year of Award


PAN

Designation

Name of the award, fellowship, received from Government or recognized bodies

Incentives given by the HEI in recognition of the award



Link for the relevant documents























Documents:

  • e-copies of award letters (scanned or soft copy).

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.



17.

2.4.5 Average percentage of full time teachers from other States against sanctioned posts during the last five years (10)

Year of Appointment


Name of full time teacher from other state


State from which qualifying degree was obtained









Documents:

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.

  • Upload the relevant supporting document.







Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)

18.

2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years (15)

Programme Name

Programme Code

Semester/ year

Last date of the last semester-end/ year- end examination

Date of declaration of results of semester-end/ year- end examination
















Documents:

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.

(May be verified from DCF of AISHE.)

*Check 5% sample from the Controller of Exam (COE) office.




19.

2.5.5 Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual: (5)
A. 100% automation of entire division & implementation of Examination Management System (EMS)
B. Only student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result Processing
C. Only student registration and result processing Opt one
D. Only result processing
E. Only manual methodology

100% automation of entire division & implementation of Examination Management System (EMS) (Yes/No)

Student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result Processing are automated (Yes/No)

Student registration and result processing are automated (Yes/No)

Result processing is only automated (Yes/No)

Follow manual methods (Yes/No)



















Documents:

  • Current Manual of examination automation system.

  • Annual reports of examination including the present status of automation.

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.







Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (30)

20.

2.6.3 Average pass percentage of students (Current year data) (10)

Programme code

Programme name

Number of students appeared in the final year examination

Number of students passed in final year examination












Documents:

  • Institutional data in prescribed format.

  • Annual Reports.

(May be verified from DCF of AISHE)






Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (30)

21.

2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process (all currently enrolled students). (30)
(Online survey to be conducted and details of the students in the format mentioned below should be uploaded)


Yüklə 2,16 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   ...   107




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin