Longitudinal Teacher Education and Workforce Study (ltews) Final Report


Structures, approaches and content considered by graduates and principals as being effective in preparing teachers for initial employment



Yüklə 3,35 Mb.
səhifə21/43
tarix26.07.2018
ölçüsü3,35 Mb.
#59224
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   43

4.2.2 Structures, approaches and content considered by graduates and principals as being effective in preparing teachers for initial employment


This section draws on survey data concerning graduates’ perceptions about their teacher preparation program. This includes both statistical data and free text responses. Principals were also surveyed with regard to their perceptions of how well teacher education programs currently equip graduates to handle their responsibilities as early career teachers.

Distinguishing features of programs


In the Graduate Teacher Survey, respondents were asked to identify any distinguishing features of their teacher preparation programs that set them apart from other programs, from a list generated through the teacher education program mapping activity. Table 56 shows those that graduate teachers identified as distinguishing features of their teacher education programs.

Table 56. Graduate teachers’ perceptions of the distinguishing features of their teacher education programs






n

%

Reflective practice

1,761

63.7

Quality teaching

1,460

52.8

Literacy

1,421

51.4

ICT skills

1,318

47.7

Supportive learning environments

1,295

46.8

Practicum visits from academic staff

1,282

46.4

Numeracy

1,276

46.1

Linking theory and practice

1,223

44.2

Content knowledge

1,215

43.9

Internship

992

35.9

Social justice

970

35.1

Social relationships

907

32.8

School Linkages

851

30.8

Catering for cultural and linguistically diverse learners

784

28.4

Team teaching

750

27.1

Discipline expertise

638

23.1

Community-based learning

588

21.3

Rural Education

522

18.9

Distance education

492

17.8

Note: n=2,765

The distinguishing features of teacher education programs most often referred to by the graduate respondents were reflective practice (64 per cent), quality teaching (53 per cent) and literacy (51 per cent). ICT and numeracy were also high on the list as distinguishing features. However, social relationships, catering for cultural and linguistically diverse learners, school linkages, team-teaching and discipline expertise, were identified by less than a third. The features that had the smallest number of responses were rural education and distance education (19 and 18 per cent, respectively).

When graduates' perceptions of distinguishing features were cross-tabulated with program type, the following results occurred. The distinguishing features are listed in Table 57 below in the order of their ranking according to those from a Bachelor of Education program.

Table 57. Graduate teacher perceptions of teacher education program distinguishing features – by program type






Masters

Bachelor

Grad. Dip.




n

%

n

%

n

%

Reflective practice

259

72.1

872

68.8

622

65.5

Quality teaching

207

57.7

773

61.0

475

50.1

Literacy

189

52.6

770

60.8

457

48.2

Numeracy

159

44.3

707

55.8

405

42.7

Supportive learning

154

42.9

690

54.5

443

46.7

ICT skills

173

48.2

689

54.4

451

47.5

Practicum visits from academic staff

175

48.7

677

53.4

424

44.7

Content knowledge

161

44.8

674

53.2

375

39.5

Linking theory and practice

173

48.2

632

49.9

411

43.3

Internship

122

34.0

629

49.6

237

25.0

Social justice

143

39.8

546

43.1

278

29.3

Social relationships

111

30.9

497

39.2

293

30.9

School linkages

126

35.1

437

34.5

284

29.9

Team teaching

98

27.3

422

33.3

226

23.8

Catering for cultural and linguistically diverse learners

118

32.9

409

32.3

254

26.8

Community learning

75

20.9

374

29.5

135

14.2

Discipline expertise

99

27.6

320

25.3

213

22.4

Rural education

58

16.2

314

24.6

147

15.5

Distance education

49

13.6

259

20.4

182

19.2

Note: Masters n=359, Bachelor n=1,267, Grad. Dip. n=949

The top three distinguishing features, referred to by respondents, were the same for all three program types. Across the three program types, reflective practice was perceived as a distinguishing feature by 72 per cent of those with a masters teacher education qualification, 69 per cent of those with a bachelor’s degree and 66 per cent of those with a graduate or postgraduate diploma. Numeracy was higher up the list for those with a bachelor’s degree, with 56 per cent indicating this as a distinguishing feature compared to 44 per cent of those from a masters program and 43 per cent of those from a graduate program. The distinguishing features referred to least by respondents were rural education and distance education for those from a masters and bachelor program. For graduate diploma respondents, community learning and rural education were the two least referred to features.

Information on how some of the above features were incorporated into teacher education programs was gathered from the teacher education institutions as part of the initial teacher education mapping component of the project. Key personnel in the institutions were asked to nominate whether some of the above features were addressed in their teacher education programs as stand-alone units, embedded in the overall program, or in a combination of both ways. The programs in which graduate teacher respondents were enrolled were cross-tabulated with this information and are shown in Table 58 below.

Table 58. Graduate teacher perceptions of teacher education program distinguishing features – by type of delivery






Standalone

Embedded

Combination

NA




n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Discipline knowledge

946

78.7

63

5.2

193

16.1

-

0.0

Teaching culturally, linguistically and socio-economically diverse learners

372

30.6

320

26.3

453

37.3

71

5.8

ICT

219

17.2

370

29.1

534

41.9

150

11.8

Numeracy

200

13.9

535

37.1

330

22.9

354

24.5

Literacy

197

13.5

461

31.7

419

28.8

354

24.3

Assessment knowledge

355

26.1

467

34.3

467

34.3

71

5.2

Pedagogical knowledge

303

22.3

490

36.0

496

36.5

71

5.2

Curriculum knowledge

177

13.0

484

35.6

628

46.2

71

5.2

Classroom management skills

327

26.0

381

30.3

479

38.1

71

5.6

Note: n=2,765

As expected, the key feature with the highest percentage being delivered as a stand-alone unit is discipline knowledge (79 per cent). Distinguishing features that are more commonly embedded than others include numeracy (37 per cent) and pedagogical knowledge (36 per cent). Features that are more commonly addressed in teacher education programs in a combination of stand-alone and embedded units are curriculum knowledge (46 per cent) and ICT (42 per cent).



Table 59 shows the institutional view of distinguishing features of teacher education programs compared to the graduate respondents' views of distinguishing features. The institutional information was collected for the mapping component of the project.

Table 59. Distinguishing features of teacher education programs – by graduate teachers and institutions




Graduates' views

Institutional views




n

%

n

%

Social justice

500

27.2

28

63.6

Discipline/method knowledge

409

22.2

18

40.9

Community partnerships

448

24.4

18

40.9

School-university partnerships

293

15.9

15

34.1

Developing reflective practitioners

273

14.8

14

31.8

Quality teaching/quality programs

234

12.7

13

29.5

Ongoing professional learning

291

15.8

13

29.5

Catering for cultural and linguistically diverse learner/community focus

208

11.3

11

25.0

School/community partnerships

162

8.8

10

22.7

Rural education focus

176

9.6

9

20.5

Others

42

2.3

7

15.9

Placement supervision

100

5.4

5

11.4

Internship

9

0.5

2

4.5

Distance education

125

6.8

2

4.5

Teach teaching

0

0.0

1

2.3

Note: Graduates n=2,765; Institutions n=44

The table is ranked in order of the features that institutions stated as a distinguishing feature of their teacher education program. The order of elements identified as distinguishing features by the graduates matches the institutional view. Although overall percentages are lower for graduates, both have the highest proportion nominating social justice as the distinguishing feature (27 per cent for graduates and 64 per cent for institutions). All other features have a similar decreasing order of magnitude for graduates and institutions.




Yüklə 3,35 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   43




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin