Why have the lives of animals, and human-animal relations been historically omitted from scholarly study?
Human superiority contributed to ignorance
They have been objects of study but not subjects of a life
There are dangers associated with giving animals subjectivity and individuality
This brings up two of the problems faculty may encounter:
Convincing your dean/dept. chair/other faculty that you are not teaching an animal rights course or that you are not teaching a silly course
Exposing students to information that challenges their own beliefs and understandings about humans, other animals, and society
HAS can be taught as stand-alone courses in disciplines in the humanities, the social sciences, and the natural sciences
HAS material can be added as sections into many courses in those same fields
Students can be assigned full books, chapters from books, or readers created by the instructor
Armstrong, Susan and Richard Botzler. 2008. The Animal Ethics Reader. London, England: Continuum.
Donovan, Josephine and Carol Adams, eds. 1996. Beyond Animal Rights:A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals. New York: Continuum.
Kalof, Linda and Brigitte Resl, eds. 2007. A Cultural History of Animals. Oxford and New York: Berg.
Manning, Aubrey and James Serpell, eds. 1994. Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Podberscek, Anthony L., Elizabeth S. Paul, and James A. Serpell. 2000. Companion Animals and Us. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Regan, Tom and Peter Singer, eds. 1989. Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Rothfels, Nigel, ed. 2002. Representing Animals. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Because HAS is both multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary, courses can easily draw from material from many other fields
History, Ethics, Geography, Women’s Studies, Ethnic Studies, and Media Studies are all fields that can be borrowed from for other disciplines
There are vast numbers of films, both documentary and feature films, that can be used in the classroom
There are vast numbers of films, both documentary and feature films, that can be used in the classroom
There is also fantastic material on Youtube
Some of the images and material in some of these films are extremely difficult to watch, and instructors must choose them carefully and facility class discussions thoughtfully
“Dogs that Changed the World”
“Holy Cow”
“Why Dogs Smile and Chimpanzees Cry”
“A Conversation with Koko”
“Ape Genius”
“Ayumu & Ai”
“Chimp Talk”
“Animal Minds”
The Ape: So Human”
“The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill”
“Katrina’s Animal Rescue”
“The Natural History of the Chicken”
“Cane Toads”
Depends on discipline and interests of instructor
In Margo DeMello’s sociology class, we begin with a section on the social construction of the animal
In the Chinese encyclopedia The Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge it is written that animals are divided into:
‘… (a) those that belong to the Emperor, (b) the embalmed ones, (c) those that are trained, (d) suckling pigs, (e) mermaids, (f) fabulous ones, (g) stray dogs, (h) those that are included in this classification, (i) those that tremble as if they were mad, (j) innumerable ones, (k) those drawn with a very fine camel’s hair brush, (l) others, (m) those that have just broken a flower vase, (n) those that resemble flies from a distance.’
Jose Luis Borges ‘The Analytic Language of John Wilkins’ in Other Inquisitions
In an essay called "Who Swims with the Tuna", David Quammen asks: why do we worry about trapping dolphins in tuna nets, and not worry about the tuna trapped in tuna nets?
In an essay called "Who Swims with the Tuna", David Quammen asks: why do we worry about trapping dolphins in tuna nets, and not worry about the tuna trapped in tuna nets?
The killing of dolphins is a national outrage; the killing of tuna is a given.
Furthermore, on our grocery shelves nowadays we find cans of a product called dolphin-safe tuna. But no tuna-safe dolphin. But why?
Historical and Comparative Perspectives
Animals as Philosophical and Ethical Subjects
Animals as Symbols/ Animals in Language/ Representing Animals
The earth trembled and a great rift appeared, separating the first man and woman from the rest of the animal kingdom. As the chasm grew deeper and wider, all other creatures, afraid for their lives, returned to the forest - except for the dog, who after much consideration, leapt the perilous rift to stay with the humans on the other side. His love for humanity was greater than his bond for other creatures, he explained, and he willingly forfeited his place in paradise to prove it.
The earth trembled and a great rift appeared, separating the first man and woman from the rest of the animal kingdom. As the chasm grew deeper and wider, all other creatures, afraid for their lives, returned to the forest - except for the dog, who after much consideration, leapt the perilous rift to stay with the humans on the other side. His love for humanity was greater than his bond for other creatures, he explained, and he willingly forfeited his place in paradise to prove it.