AIDS Law Project
|
Not relevant. Court cases are based on real experiences of discrimination.
|
AFSA
|
Well elaborated appraisal system that demands a well documented situation analysis. No baseline data are asked.
|
St. Joseph care centre
|
No evidence
|
Positive Muslims
|
No info (visited in the first phase)
|
SACBC
|
No info (visited in the first phase)
|
ICOCA
|
No evidence
|
Yoneco
|
No evidence
|
LL Diocese
|
No evidence
|
Plan Malawi
|
No measurement criteria or methods in place to measure success of programmes.
|
Safaids
|
A few impact assessments have been conducted. No needs assessments executed.
|
WASN
|
Analysis of HIV/AIDS situation but not systematically. Qualitative knowledge base is not well documented.
|
Tsungirirai
|
Baseline information was collected but research officer left organisation before the data were analysed properly.
|
Arise
|
No evidence. Informal needs assessment by being integrated in the communities.
|
FACT
|
No info
|
GAP
|
Stakeholder analysis in the villages to establish AIDS committees
|
SIAAP
|
Regular surveys and research. No baseline data
|
Samuha/Samraksha
|
Baseline, community based, study on the spread and the control of HIV/AIDS that forms the basis of their programme.
|
The evaluators did not see many baseline studies, needs assessments or situation analyses. One could conclude that the counterparts reacted to emerging needs and responded in a self evident way, offering good services but without much creative or new solutions. Only a few counterparts took up the challenges they are facing (some of which have been described in the above), shared ‘lessons learned’ from new approaches or were able to influence the approach of other services providers (public or private).
