Mbn hiv/aids evaluation final report Team of consultants
Yüklə 0,97 Mb.
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- Zimbabwe ( 5)
- India ( 8)
- Global Partners (n=5)
Global Partners (n=5) : HASAP (Cordaid-Novib), Eucumenical Advocacy Alliance (ICCO), International Community of Women living with HIV/AIDS (Novib), Agua Buena (Hivos), Plan Europe Additional visits to support organisation (capacity building and organisational development) (n=3): Cabungo (novib), CDRA (Cordaid), OLIVE (Cordaid)1 39 interventions have been visited. The consultants distinguish four categories of cases: (1) 24 cases2 that have been selected out of a portfolio of HIV/AIDS related initiatives, funded by the five CFAs (2) 5 global or regional partners that are funded by the CFAs to support advocacy and lobby activities at regional or international level. (3) 2 additional cases that are specialised in capacity building activities related to HIV/AIDS mainstreaming (4) 8 cases that have been evaluated in the first phase by ETC Crystal. The Aide memoirs will be taken into account while assessing the judgement criteria. The sample was steered by the overall evaluation question, namely to assess the relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of the CFAs funding strategies, policies and practices for the fight against HIV/AIDS in the Southern Africa and South Asian regions. It was not the objective to set up a comparative study. A comparative study needs a different approach, not at least regarding the sampling method. However, in relation to evaluation questions one and two differences between the five CFAs will be highlighted where relevant. It is more difficult to differentiate the conclusions on the evaluation questions three and four as the counterparts visited are representative for the work of the CFAs as a whole but not as such for each CFA in particular. The counterparts are also very diverse what makes it even more difficult to compare. This evaluation was in the first place an accountability study focussing on the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the AIDS focussed organisations visited on the one hand (EQ 3) and the generalist organisations visited (EQ 4) on the other hand. The set up of the evaluation does not permit to attribute conclusions to each CFA separately. Where relevant, lessons learned will be described. Yüklə 0,97 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|