msnw>
As told by Chief Blackhawk (Detroit, 40 years in October,
1998), sitting on the front porch of Dr. Bob's house at
855 Ardmore in Akron, Ohio to Floyd H. of Spring, Texas.
ORGANIZATIONS
There are vital reasons that we are not allied with
any sects, denominations, politics, organizations, or
institutions. You want to know what they are?
The Cleveland group's experience with an outside
organization taught us about the danger of trying that.
Get in with another organization, they bring their
values and opinions and they seldom are what we know
works in helping drunks. When the Clarence Snyder
(Home Brewmeister) group formed in Cleveland, an article
ran in the Cleveland newspaper, The Plain Dealer.
The group was flooded with requests for help, and many
were low-bottoms who needed 3-5 days of hospitalization.
After being turned down by all the local hospitals and
after helping the son of a person associated with the
Salvation Army, that organization told Clarence they'd
make some beds available for alcoholics. In accepting
their aid, two things happened. First, AA became allied
with an outside organization; next, they fell under that
organization's philosophy about recovering from alcoholism
and compromised what the alcoholics knew really worked.
In order to get the beds, the AA's violated their own
procedures. I asked: So what was that organization's
philosophy that went against what AA's had been doing?
They answered: The Cleveland Salvation Army had a policy
of limiting bed space for anyone to a total of three
months. Their motive was noble: We'll help you
down-and-out's to get by until you get a job and a place
of your own, but to motivate you, weire putting a time
limit on our assistance -- you have three months, max.
Now, for the alkies coming in, they told them the same
thing but added, You also have to visit with a recovered
alcoholic daily; that is, you have to meet with them 90
times in 90 days, and we're gonna check to make sure
you do. Miss a meeting and you have no bed. You're back
on the streets. So instead of taking the drunks through
in 3 or 4 hours the way we always did it, or a matter
of days at the most, we're now into this 90-in-90 plan.
I said: So the Cleveland Salvation Army introduced this
thing we hear so often today -- Go to 90 meetings in
90 days?
They said, Exactly. And the early Cleveland AA's,
desperate to get beds they thought they had to have,
compromised their approach to working the steps
quickly. But to their great credit, the Cleveland AA's
keep meticulous records with Clarence's insistence)
and their stats revealed that no one gained any
long-term sobriety using that plan. So Cleveland
separated itself from the Salvation Army with a
valuable lesson: stick to the methods proven
successful -- alkies taking alkies through the steps
and doing it pronto. After Cleveland got back to
doing that instead of the 90-in-90-Salvation-Army plan,
the AA's got a 93% success rate over the next several
decades.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3638. . . . . . . . . . . . "Take what you need and leave the
rest"
From: Paul S. . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/17/2006 8:50:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi everybody
In another cyberforum came up a discussion about
this AA motto or saying.
Something like "Take what you want and leave the rest."
It is widely used and can (in my opinion) also be
dangerous.
(It seems to me that it is wiser to remember the
motto, which comes straight from the Big Book, p. 59:
"Half measures awailed us nothing")
Question: From where comes this sentence? Is it just
one more of those things which appeared somewhere and
just started being repeated, without anybody ever
knowing where it came from?
And BTW: Thanks for this interesting-informative forum
and its excellent "search-machine." (This time it however
"failed.")
All the best
Paul S. aka soberfinn
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3639. . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Silkworth''s two letters
From: gbaa487 . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/15/2006 12:51:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
in the Big Book there are two letters written by
Dr. Silkworth.
What is the time frame between the two letters,
and why were there two eventually written?
Thanks
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3640. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Take what you need and leave
the rest"
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 3:17:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From: "Jon Markle"
(serenitylodge at
bellsouth.net)
"Take what you need and leave the rest" is a "saying"
that is heard often at
meetings in Al-anon, and is used in their conference approved literature,
more
than once.
Two at-hand references are: Courage to Change, pg 117 (April 26 reading) and
pg
321 (November 16 reading).
Now, where that saying originated, I don't know. It is an "axiom"
that appears
in almost all 12-step literature.
But I don't think it appears in AA literature. I cannot say this for
certain,
but I didn't hear it when I first got sober and certainly, my home group
taught
me the reverse that was referenced, "half measures avail us
nothing." When I
did a "search," it came up in all sorts of religious and secular
contexts and
was not limited to recovery material, but nothing in AA literature, although
it
was reported in AA settings (groups, chat rooms, e-mail exchange lists,
etc.).
I believe the saying was originally intended to be used to indicate that
there
are some things one hears at meetings that simply are not part of recovery
via
the 12-steps, and while they might be useful, they are not necessarily tools
that the 12 steps perpetuate, so one is free to use them or not.
The closest thing I heard later on in AA came from my sponsor, which I've
used
myself: "Take what you need today and put the rest on the shelf for
later
reference."
That's the best I can do you for now. If I find any other references, I'll
forward them.
Jon Markle
Raleigh
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3641. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Dr. Silkworth''s two letters
From: Bill Lash . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 8:14:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Good morning all! The first letter in "The Doctor's Opinion" was
written by
Dr. Silkworth on 7/27/38 as a
referral letter for AA. The second "statement" is taken from a few
different articles that Silky wrote
pieced together (see previous posts). I've never been able to find every
paragraph in the Big Book from this
second "statement" in Silky's articles so I would suspect that
some of it
even came from conversations
that Bill had with him. Namaste.
Just Love,
Barefoot Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of gbaa487
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:52 AM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Dr. Silkworth's two letters
in the Big Book there are two letters written by
Dr. Silkworth.
What is the time frame between the two letters,
and why were there two eventually written?
Thanks
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3642. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: "Take what you need and leave
the rest"
From: ArtSheehan . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 8:46:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Paul
There is an old saying that "imitation is the highest form of
flattery." Such seems to be the case for the common expressions and
catchphrases in AA today. Slogans and other sayings will eventually
spread through AA if they strike members as notable and useful.
Discovering primacy in terms of where catchphrases originated is by no
means easy to do with confidence due to the autonomous and anonymous
nature of AA. Plus there is just far too frequent reliance by members
on dubious anecdotal and ambiguous sources that are much more the
product of fertile imagination rather than well researched factual
information (e.g. the recent posting on "90 meetings in 90 days").
While there are history books and articles maintained by the
Fellowship (e.g. AA Comes of Age, Grapevine articles, etc.) local
history documentation is quite a hit or miss affair. It might be
possible to get an approximation of when particular sayings started in
certain locales, but pinning down the origin location is, at best,
very difficult.
The earliest documented sources I can find thus far for the
"take/leave" catchphrase are from 1962 and 1985 Grapevine issues:
June 1962 Grapevine article "The Twelve Steps Revisited/Step 8" by
J E
from Guilford, CN.
"Take this thing cafeteria style I was advised. Select what you want
and can digest, and leave the rest until later."
September 1985 Grapevine article "Your Move" by V F from Eureka,
KS.
"Though I didn't agree with all the opinions expressed, why should I
expect 'our meeting in print' to be different from any other meeting?
Take what you need and leave the rest."
As far as I have been able to determine to date, the Big Book was
never intended to be the "final word" or the be-all and end-all
source
that so many members make it today. If it were, the 12and12 would not
have been written (by the same author). Also the parsing of a
particular catchphrase will vary quite a bit among members,
particularly when it comes to reading things into a sentence that are
not expressly written there. It's one of the things that makes AA so
interesting and enjoyable.
The "half measures" citation reputedly owes its origin to the 1931
book "The Common Sense of Drinking" by Richard Peabody. It
strengthened the concept of alcoholism as an illness and contained the
statement "Half measures are to no avail." The book was a
prominent
reference source in the early AA Fellowship. Peabody died drunk so the
catchphrase did not appear to serve him very well.
Cheers
Arthur
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul S.
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 7:51 AM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] "Take what you need and leave the rest"
Hi everybody
In another cyberforum came up a discussion about this AA motto or
saying.
Something like "Take what you want and leave the rest."
It is widely used and can (in my opinion) also be dangerous.
(It seems to me that it is wiser to remember the motto, which comes
straight from the Big Book, p. 59:
"Half measures awailed us nothing")
Question: From where comes this sentence? Is it just one more of those
things which appeared somewhere and just started being repeated,
without anybody ever knowing where it came from?
And BTW: Thanks for this interesting-informative forum and its
excellent "search-machine." (This time it however
"failed.")
All the best
Paul S. aka soberfinn
Yahoo! Groups Links
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3643. . . . . . . . . . . . Significant August Dates in A.A.
History
From: chesbayman56 . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 1:37:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello Folks, I have been so Busy I simply for got the beginging of
this month this Month.
Significant August dates in AA history
Aug 1934 - Rowland H and Cebra persuade court to parole Ebby T. to
them.
Aug 1939 - Dr. Bob wrote and may have signed article for Faith
magazine.
Aug 1981 - Distribution of Alcoholics Anonymous passes 3 million.
Aug 1, 1943 - Washington Times-Herald (DC) reports on AA clubhouse,
to protect anonymity withholds address.
Aug 3, 1954 - Brinkley S. gets sober at Towns Hosp after 50th detox.
Aug 8, 1879 - Dr. Bob born in St. Johnsbury, VT.
Aug 9, 1943 - LA groups announce 1000 members in 11 groups.
Aug 11, 1938 - Akron and NY members begin writing stories for Big Book.
Aug 15, 1890 - E M Jellinek is born, author of "The Disease Concept
of Alcoholism" and the "Jellinek Curve".
Aug 16, 1939 - Dr Bob and Sister Ignatia admit 1st alcoholic to St
Thomas Hospital, Akron, Ohio.
Aug 18, 1988 - 1st Canadian National AA Convention in Halifax, Nova
Scotia.
Aug 19, 1941 - 1st AA Meeting in Colorado is held in Denver.
Aug 25, 1943 - AA group donates Big Book to public library in
Quincy, MA.
Aug 26, 1941 - Bill writes Dr Bob to tell him Works Publishing has
been incorporated
Aug 28, 1954 - "24 Hours a Day" is published by Richmond W.
Also in August...
Sales of the Big Book passes 3,000,000 - August 1981
1st meeting in Orange County, California held in Anaheim - August,
1941
Nancy O, the founder of AAHL Started compiling this list before she
passed. I always looked forward to the begining of the month when
she posted it. Please feel free to contribute to this list. I will
try to keep it accurate, as best I can, so it would be great if you
can
provide the source of the date. The best way to to get the
information is to e-mail it to me Directly.
In love and service,
Billy C.
Annapolis, Md
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3644. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Silkworth''s two letters
From: johnlawlee . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 12:58:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "gbaa487"
wrote:
>
> in the Big Book there are two letters written by
> Dr. Silkworth.
>
> What is the time frame between the two letters,
> and why were there two eventually written?
>
> Thanks
>
A photo of first Silkworth letter is dated July 27, 1938, and
included in Dale Mitchel's 2002 biog of Doctor Silkworth,The Little
Doctor Who Loved Drunks [Hazelden-Pittman Archives Press]. That biog
indicates that the second letter was dated sometime in early 1939.
The first letter from Silkworth is a rather lackluster, general
endorsement of the experience of an [unamed] Bill Wilson, a patient
who was under treatment from Silkworth three times. The second
endorsement letter from Silkworth is much more specific and
sweeping. The second letter speaks of the phenomenon of craving, the
need for a psychic change, and the need for something more than
human power. Silkworth refers to the problem, the solution and the
plan of action.
Nothing in the Silkworth biog indicates why the second
endorsement letter was requested. I have to assume that Bill and
Hank, the promoters of the soon-to-be-published book, felt the book
needed a stirring rave from a mainstream source. They likely felt
that the first letter lacked specifics and sufficient enthusiasm.
The text of the Big Book, between the two Silkworth letters,
indicates that, "the physician who, at our request, gave us this
letter, has been kind enough to enlarge upon his views..." Bill and
Hank had both been treated at Towns Hospital, and I imagine one of
them just asked Silkworth to amplify the doctor's viewpoint in a
followup letter.
John Lee
Pittsburgh
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3645. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Take what you need and leave
the rest"
From: johnlawlee . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 4:21:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Jon,
Courage to Change is the newer meditation book of
Alanon. The cliche about "Take what you need..."
is not in the basic Al-Anon literature. The two
references to the cliche are just reflections by
two Alanon members who heard the cliche at Al-Anon
meetings. I don't believe you'll find a reference
to this cliche that predates the 1982 pop tune
"Reap the Wild Wind".
john lee
pittsburgh
__________________________
From: "Jon Markle"
(serenitylodge at bellsouth.net)
"Take what you need and leave the rest" is a
"saying" that is heard often at meetings in
Al-anon, and is used in their conference
approved literature, more than once.
Two at-hand references are: Courage to
Change, pg 117 (April 26 reading) and pg 321
(November 16 reading).
> Jon Markle
> Raleigh
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3646. . . . . . . . . . . . Clarence S.''s visit to Edmonton
From: The Wilsons . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/23/2006 1:18:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I came across a news article about Clarence S attending the 20th annual
Alberta AA Conference in Edmonton. Does anyone know when this
conference was held?
Bob Wilson
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3647. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Take what you need and leave
the rest"
From: Ernest Kurtz . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 7:46:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments from Ernie Kurtz, Art Boudreault, and Arkie Koehl
From: Ernest Kurtz
(kurtzern at umich.edu)
Hi Art,
As usual, you are so right. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, Bill W.
fairly often wrote in letters to someone who had questioned something or
other in the Big Book that he had not meant it "to be the last
word,"
but that "members of the fellowship would crucify" him if he tried
to
change a word, which was one reason why he wrote the essays in the
12and12. In fact, even while composing those pieces (which first appeared
in the AAGV), Bill wrote to some that he hoped the essays on which he
was working would help to "clarify" some things in the Big Book.
Some
of those letters, as I recall, are specifically cited in the notes to
*Not-God*.
ernie kurtz
______________________________
From: "Art Boudreault"
(artb at netwiz.net)
Dear Paul and others,
The closing that is read at Al-Anon meetings begins
this way. "In closing, the opinions expressed here
were strictly those of the person who gave them.
'Take what you liked and leave the rest'."
I have found that much of what is stated in Al-Anon
from the early days is rooted in AA literature, but
I am unaware where this statement from the AA
literature might lie.
The "Al-Anon Family Groups Classic Edition", pages
165 - 157, explains that the Al-Anon closing was
added to the book "Al-Anon Family Groups" at its
fourth printing in May 1973.
The statement is clearly meant to warn the members
that statements made in meetings by members may or
may not be appropriate Al-Anon philosophy or policy.
It has nothing at all to do with the statements in
Al-Anon's Conference Approved Literature.
If it didn't initially come from AA, then it is
possible that members of Al-Anon who became AA members
or AA members who became members of Al-Anon brought
it back to AA.
As an aside, AA members who had problems with others
who drank too much were officially allowed to attend
Al-Anon meetings by vote of the Al-Anon World Service
Conference in 1969. Prior to that vote it was up to
the autonomy of the Al-Anon group whether to allow
AA members into their closed Al-Anon meetings.
Bill and Lois always seemed to imply in their early
statements that AA members were to attend AA meetings
and their relatives, Al-Anon meetings. Bill was
clear in stating that AA members should not participate
in Al-Anon policy, even if they were also members of
Al-Anon. In Al-Anon, the World Service conference made
this policy official in 1975 as a response to the
1969 vote, because by 1975, many AA members were finding
help in Al-Anon and wanted to be part of the service
structure as well.
Sincerely,
Art Boudreault
artb@netwiz.net
______________________________
From: Arkie Koehl
(arkie at arkoehl.com)
On Aug 19, 2006, at 2:46, ArtSheehan wrote:
As far as I have been able to determine to date,
the Big Book was never intended to be the "final word"
or the be-all and end-all source that so many members
make it today.
Thanks for this, Art. I think Bill would be embarrassed
at the iconic status we've conferred on the BB.
Arkie
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3648. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Re: Dr. Silkworth''s two letters
From: ArtSheehan . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/19/2006 9:37:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi John
Dr Silkworth's July 27, 1938 letter was written under the letterhead
of the Charles B Towns Hospital which enjoyed a national reputation in
alcohol and drug addiction treatment. In part, it states:
"These facts appear to be of extreme medical importance; because of
the extraordinary possibilities of rapid growth inherent in this group
they mark a new epoch in the annals of alcoholism. These men may well
have a remedy for thousands of such situations.
You may rely absolutely on anything they say about themselves."
This hardly sound like "a rather lackluster, general endorsement"
as
you frame it.
The July 27, 1938 letter was originally written as a letter of
reference for Bill W to aid in fund raising for the Big Book project.
The Alcoholic Foundation was legally established as a charitable trust
the following month (August 5). The letter also served as a medical
endorsement in the foundation's fund raising efforts and later was
included in its entirety in the Big Book introduction "The Doctor's
Opinion.".
The second narrative by Dr Silkworth was not a letter. It appears in
the Big Book based on a suggestion by Dr Esther L Richardson of John
Hopkins Hospital. She was sent a prospectus which included two sample
book chapters ("There Is A solution" and "Bill's
Story"). A July 18,
1938 letter she wrote to Bill W included a rave review of the two
chapters and a recommendation that:
"I think you should get an A No. 1 physician who has a wide knowledge
of the alcoholic's medical and social problem to write an
introduction."
The second narrative from Dr Silkworth is that introduction and was
written specifically to be included in the Big Book. Part of his
introduction states "There was, therefore, a sense of real
satisfaction when I was asked to contribute a few words on a subject
which is covered in such masterly detail in these pages."
I cannot pin down the precise date that the narrative from Dr
Silkworth or "The Doctor's Opinion" introduction were written but
it
was part of the multilith manuscript distributed for review in January
1939. My best "guesstimate" would be that it was written in
December
1938.
After review of the multilith manuscript, Dr Silkworth was one of the
reviewers who suggested easing the tone of the book from "you
must" to
"we ought." (see AA Comes of Age pgs 167-168). Bill W wrote
"And we
must never forget that it was Dr Silkworth who wrote the introduction
to the first edition of Alcoholics Anonymous, giving the volume
medical standing."
As an item of AA trivia "The Doctor's Opinion" began as page 1 in
the
1st edition and was not changed to Roman numerals until the 2nd
edition. The basic text ended at page 174 in the 1st edition, not 164
as it does today. Nobody really knows why Bill W renumbered the pages
but there is much entertaining speculation on the matter.
Dale Mitchel's biography of Dr Silkworth is a wonderful read and quite
revealing of the magnificent character and commitment of Dr Silkworth.
He served as a non-alcoholic trustee on the Alcoholic Foundation Board
the two years prior to his death and is reputed to have treated over
40,000 alcoholics in his lifetime at Towns and Knickerbocker Hospitals
in NYC.
Cheers
Arthur
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of johnlawlee
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 11:58 AM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Dr. Silkworth's two letters
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "gbaa487"
wrote:
>
> in the Big Book there are two letters written by Dr. Silkworth.
>
> What is the time frame between the two letters, and why were there
two
> eventually written?
>
> Thanks
>
A photo of first Silkworth letter is dated July 27, 1938, and
included in Dale Mitchel's 2002 biog of Doctor Silkworth,The Little
Doctor Who Loved Drunks [Hazelden-Pittman Archives Press]. That biog
indicates that the second letter was dated sometime in early 1939.
The first letter from Silkworth is a rather lackluster, general
endorsement of the experience of an [unamed] Bill Wilson, a patient
who was under treatment from Silkworth three times. The second
endorsement letter from Silkworth is much more specific and sweeping.
The second letter speaks of the phenomenon of craving, the need for a
psychic change, and the need for something more than human power.
Silkworth refers to the problem, the solution and the plan of action.
Nothing in the Silkworth biog indicates why the second
endorsement letter was requested. I have to assume that Bill and Hank,
the promoters of the soon-to-be-published book, felt the book needed a
stirring rave from a mainstream source. They likely felt that the
first letter lacked specifics and sufficient enthusiasm.
The text of the Big Book, between the two Silkworth letters, indicates
that, "the physician who, at our request, gave us this letter, has
been kind enough to enlarge upon his views..." Bill and Hank had both
been treated at Towns Hospital, and I imagine one of them just asked
Silkworth to amplify the doctor's viewpoint in a followup letter.
John Lee
Pittsburgh
Yahoo! Groups Links
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3649. . . . . . . . . . . . Richard Peabody died drunk?
Documentation?
From: Mel Barger . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/23/2006 8:59:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Art,
Is there any documentation for the statement that Richard Peabody died
drunk?
Mel Barger
melb@accesstoledo.com
(melb at accesstoledo.com)
_________________________________________
Original Message from: "ArtSheehan"
(ArtSheehan at msn.com)
Subject: RE: [AAHistoryLovers] "Take what you need and leave the
rest"
> The "half measures" citation reputedly owes its origin to the
1931
> book "The Common Sense of Drinking" by Richard Peabody. It
> strengthened the concept of alcoholism as an illness and contained the
> statement "Half measures are to no avail." The book was a
prominent
> reference source in the early AA Fellowship. Peabody died drunk so the
> catchphrase did not appear to serve him very well.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3650. . . . . . . . . . . . Johnstone P.''s story, "You have to
give it away..."
From: kilroy@ceoexpress.com> . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/20/2006 1:23:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Can someone tell me whatever happened to Johnstone
P. from Ohio? His story appeared in the second edition
of the Big Book and was missing thereafter.
I often hear people quote him at meetings. Mostly
they only use one of his four quotes, the one that
states, "You have to give it away if you want to
keep it."
Kilroy W.
4021 Club
Philadelphia PA
_____________________________________________________________
A Member of CEOExpressSelect - www.ceoexpress.com
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3651. . . . . . . . . . . . 90 in 90 days in Bright Star Press
pre-1970 pamphlet
From: ricktompkins@comcast.net . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/21/2006 2:19:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi group,
"90 meetings in 90 days"-- who hasn't heard that
suggestion in AA at least once?
In a Bright Star Press pamphlet that definitely
pre-dates 1970 (when the company was printing in
Moline, Illinois before moving to Texas) I recently
found evidence to what may erroneously be getting
attributed to treatment centers.
(And, according to Mitchell, the Cleveland Salvation
Army story --fabricated? -- adds to the mythology
of the phrase's first use.)
In a pamphlet (same size as the earliest Akron
AA pamphlets) titled "Handles" that has 40+ pages
of AA phrases, slogans, and brief recovery support
pieces (Handles to help in Sobriety), I found this
phrase at the top of one page:
"TRY 90 MEETINGS IN 90 DAYS AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE
IT WE CAN REFUND YOUR MISERY"
Oldtimers used this phrase, all or part of it,
when I came around in the 1980s, so I respectfully
estimate its AA use from at least the 1960s.
The Bright Star Press record leads me to believe
it's an original AA phrase, too, but as to the date
of its origin perhaps there's a reference in an
early AA Grapevine (via their online archives search
program).
One of us can find it...
rick, illinois
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3652. . . . . . . . . . . . History of closed and open
discussion meetings
From: jerry . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/21/2006 5:24:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Questions from Jerry and abigapple about
(1) when and where what we now call closed AA
meetings (alcoholics only and no spouses allowed
anywhere near the premises) first began to be
held, and
(2) when and where the idea of what are called
"open discussion meetings" on modern AA
meeting schedules first began to appear.
House meetings, which were still held frequently
in the U.S. for a long time, commonly had the
alcoholics in the living room, but the spouses
were in the kitchen, and in the average modest
American five room family home, they were
within easy earshot of everything that was discussed
in the living room, and all parties were involved
in the "meeting after the meeting" which
occurred afterwards. So this is not a simple,
open and shut question of when the alcoholics
within the Oxford Group first began to hold
meetings "for alcoholics only."
CLOSED MEETINGS
From "jerry"
(jerrytwotord at hotmail.com)
Hello group
Perhaps someone can help me here. All the reading
I've done on our founders seems to point to the fact
that our first meetings be they AA or Oxford Group
meetings were family affairs. If this is so, just where
did the "closed" meeting come in and for what purpose?
Is there any documentation of this? Any help is
appreciated.
Jerry
______________________________
OPEN DISCUSSION MEETINGS
From "abigapple2002"
(abigapple2002 at yahoo.com)
O.K., so I've heard a variety of opinions on whether or
not we should have some meetings which are "open
discussion meetings."
I've also heard a variety of "facts" as to when and
how they came about. I thought you all would be a
little more reliable in this case as to when the first
open discussion meeting came about, where
and possibly even why.
Thanks a lot. I've just passed three years, and really
beginning to have a "thirst" for AA history. Thanks
to all of you for being here and being willing to share
what you've found.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3653. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Johnstone P.''s story, "You have
to give it away..."
From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/24/2006 4:13:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Johnstone P. from Ohio? You probably mean John P. from
Atlanta.
____________________________
At 00:23 8/20/2006 , kilroy@ceoexpress.com wrote:
Can someone tell me whatever happened to Johnstone
P. from Ohio? His story appeared in the second edition
of the Big Book and was missing thereafter.
I often hear people quote him at meetings. Mostly
they only use one of his four quotes, the one that
states, "You have to give it away if you want to
keep it."
Kilroy W.
4021 Club
Philadelphia PA
____________________________
Do you mean John P who wrote "The Professor and
the Paradox"?
He was from Atlanta.
The four paradoxes are:
We surrender to win.
We give away to keep.
We suffer to get well.
We die to live.
His bio is here:
Dostları ilə paylaş: