Access arrangement final decision Envestra Ltd 2013–17 Part 2: Attachments



Yüklə 2,17 Mb.
səhifə42/56
tarix09.01.2019
ölçüsü2,17 Mb.
#94320
1   ...   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   ...   56

13Non-tariff components


  1. Envestra's access arrangement proposal sets out terms and conditions that are not directly related to the nature or level of tariffs paid by users, but which are important to the relationship between the network service provider and users. These are referred to by the AER as non-tariff components of the access arrangement.

  2. This attachment sets out the AER’s consideration of the non-tariff components of Envestra’s revised access arrangement proposal. These include Envestra’s proposed capacity trading requirements,966 queuing policy,967 extension and expansion requirements968, and terms and conditions on which the reference service will be provided.
    1. Final decision


  1. The AER does not approve Envestra's proposed non-tariff components. In particular, the AER does not approve the following:

  • Envestra's terms and conditions in Annexure F to its revised access arrangement proposal.

  • Envestra's Network Extensions and Expansions under clause 8 of its revised access arrangement proposal.

  • New clause 9g) of Envestra's network user policy in clause 6.4 of its revised access arrangement proposal.

  • Envestra's revision commencement date

  1. The AER approves the following non-tariff components:

  • Envestra's Capacity trading procedures under clause 7 of its revised access arrangement proposal.

  • Envestra's draft access arrangement insofar as it does not include any queuing arrangements.

  • Envestra's terms and conditions for changes to receipt or delivery points in clause 7.3 of its revised access arrangement proposal.

  • Review submission date
    1. Terms and conditions

      1. Final decision


  1. The AER does not approve Envestra's proposed terms and conditions. In particular, the AER does not approve the inclusion of the following terms:

  • 19.3—Service Attempt

  • 26.3—Right to suspend services

  1. The AER proposes amendments to the following terms to make Envestra's access arrangement acceptable:

  • 3.3—Fixed component of the haulage service charge (Albury)

  • 9.3—Maintenance and removal

  • 28.2—Termination by Envestra

  • 33.3—User's indemnities–death or personal injury

  • 34—Insurance

  • 35.5(c) —Access to premises

  • 39—Assignment

  1. The AER proposes to either amend some of these proposed terms and conditions or remove others altogether.
      1. Revised proposal


      1. Envestra in its revised access arrangement proposal in relation to terms and conditions adopted most of the amendments required by the AER in its draft decision. In some cases Envestra has made minor changes to the amendment required by the AER.


      1. Assessment approach


  1. The AER's assessment approach for terms and conditions is set out in section 12.1.3 in attachment 12 of part 2 of the draft decision.

  2. The AER received submissions from AGL969 and Origin.970
      1. Reasons for decision


Where Envestra has adopted the AER's draft decision on a particular term, and no further submissions have been received on that term, the AER approves those terms or conditions for the reasons set out in its draft decision.971

The AER's reasons for approving or not approving all other terms and conditions is set out below.


Fixed component of the Haulage Service Charge

Albury

  1. The AER proposes to revise sub-clause 3.3 (Fixed component of the Haulage Service Charge) in Envestra's Albury access arrangement. The AER's proposed amendment will remove the reference to Current User. This will reflect the approach taken by Envestra for its Victorian network and will make the Albury access arrangement acceptable.

  2. Sub-clause 3.3 is substantially the same for the Envestra Victoria and Albury revised access arrangement proposals. The only variation is the clause in the Albury access arrangement proposal refers to the 'Current User'. However, this term is not defined.

  3. AGL's submission points to the disparity between the two clauses.972

  4. To address this disparity, the AER considers that consistency between Envestra's two businesses is beneficial and avoids confusion. This promotes the efficient operation and use of gas services and is in the long term interests of consumers with respect to price.
Albury & Victoria-Ongoing service charges

  1. Sub-clause 3.3 provides that the Network User will remain responsible to pay Haulage Service Charges in respect of each Delivery Point for so long as it remains the FRO (Financially Responsible Organisation) for that Delivery Point.

  2. AGL submitted that if there is no shared customer at the Delivery Point (DP) and no consumption, the Network User should not be liable for ongoing service charges.973

  3. The AER considers that under AEMO’s Retail Market Procedures for Victoria, the party registered as the FRO is the party responsible for settling the account relating to the supply point. Accordingly, the AER considers that the proposed sub-clause is appropriate, because it follows the procedures of the market operator. This is consistent with the efficient operation of Envestra’s network.

Yüklə 2,17 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   ...   56




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin