Annual Work Plan 2017


Annex 1: Results & Resource Framework



Yüklə 0,51 Mb.
səhifə12/14
tarix26.07.2018
ölçüsü0,51 Mb.
#58615
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14

4. Annex 1: Results & Resource Framework



INCLUSIVE GROWTH

Outputs

Activities

Timeframe

Responsible Party

Budget

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4




Funding Source

Budget Description

Amount (USD)

Confirmed

Gap

Output 1: Enhanced Social Protection
Baseline:

1.1. Social security is biased to formal workers with limited coverage of those working in the informal sectors.

1.2. Eleven percent of households experienced hunger

1.3. Thirteen percent of households experiencing hunger


Targets:

1.1. Pilot a social security scheme for informal workers.

1.2. Develop a food security plan

1.3. Develop an information and knowledge exchange platform to share information on social protection


Indicators:

1.1. Framework document for selecting informal workers and type of social protection scheme to be piloted.

1.2. Informal workers category identified and area identified to conduct a pilot

1.3. Food security plan proposal finalised

1.4. Digital platform identifies


1.1. Provide Support to the DPME in piloting a small scale social support intervention for informal workers




x







DPME/UNDP

DPME

Consultants/

meetings


200 000

0

200 000

1.2. Develop a framework for the selection of informal workers for the pilot

X










DPME/UNDP

DPME

Consultant. Workshop/

seminar


25 000

0

25 000

1.3. Develop a food security plan as part of social protection mechanism

x

x







DPME/UNDP

DPME

Consultants, meetings and workshops

50 000

0

50 000

1.4. Disseminate knowledge products on relevant digital platforms

x

x

x

x

UNDP

DPME/UNDP

Publications

0







Sub-Total

























275 000

0

275 000

Output 2: Expanded Access to employment opportunities
Baseline:

2.1Legislation declared constitutionally invalid because of lack sufficient community consultation.

2.2. Lack of clarity on policy process development.

2.3. Uncoordinated support to rural development and land reform.

2.5. Insufficient information on the potential economic impact of the regulation of agriculture land holding bill.

2.6. Inadequate information on the status of mega and super farms.

2.7. Inadequate consultation with stakeholders on the implementation of NDP.
Targets:

2.1 Report on the community and provincial consultative forum on Land Tenure Bill

2.2. Work plan on the development of economic model and policy support & feasibility study on the status of mega and super farms

2.3. International Exchange and Knowledge sharing brown bag organised.

2.4. Project proposal on cooperation project between EU and DRDLR.

2.5. Closure report of the bilateral cooperation programme on PSDS.

2.6. Report on government department providing technical and financial support to DRDLR objectives.
Indicators:

2.1. Community consultations held.

2.2. Work-plan on economic modelling and consultant recruited to conduct study on mega and super farms.

2.3. Concept note on international exchange and knowledge- sharing developed.

2.4. Consultant recruited to facilitate the Development of a Cooperation Project Proposal Between the European Union Commission in South Africa.

2.5. Consultant recruited to support closure of Bilateral Cooperation programme Participatory Settlement and Development Support to Land Reform Beneficiaries and Rural Citizens (PSDS) between Belgium and South Africa.

2.6. Consultant recruited to identify Government Departments with budget support to DRDLR programmes.


2.1. Provide policy support to the Government in developing policies that will enable rural people and small holder farmer access to land

  • Conduct community consultation on Land tenure Bill.

  • Organise a provincial consultative conference on Land Tenure Bill.

  • Develop policy process mapping Framework for the DRDLR.

x

x

x

x







DRDLR

DRDLR

Consultants

48 000

48 000

0

2.2. Provide technical support and expertise on land size efficiency and policy advice on land holdings.

  • Design an economic model on regulation of agriculture land holding bill.

  • Provide advisory support in the planning and implementation of the Regulation of Agricultural Land Holding Policy and Bill.

  • Conduct a study on the status of mega-farms and super-farms in South Africa.

X

X

X



X

x


X

x


DRDLR

DRDLR

Consultants, meetings, seminars

693 000.

693 000


0

2.3. Facilitate the establishment International Exchange Programme to share international experience on land reform programmes.

  • Organise international study tours.

  • Organise seminars and video conferences to share experience.

x

x

X


X

UNDP


DRDLR

Seminars/conferences, publications

5 000


5 000


0


2.4. Provide Technical Assistant to Facilitate the Development of a Cooperation Project Proposal Between the European Union Commission in South Africa, its Relevant Member States and the South African Department of Rural Development and Land Reform.

x

x

x

x

DRDLR

DRDLR

consultant

50 770

57 000

0

2.5. Support to closure of Bilateral Cooperation programme Participatory Settlement and Development Support to Land Reform Beneficiaries and Rural Citizens (PSDS) between Belgium and South Africa.

x










DRDLR/UNDP

DRDLR

Consultants

28 000

28 000


0


2.6. Study to identify 10 Government Departments with budget support for DRDLR programmes.

x










DRDLR/UNDP

DRDLR

Consultants

27 000


27 000

0

Baseline:

2.7. Inadequate consultation with stakeholders on the implementation of NDP.


Target:

2.7. Three public debates, two round table discussions and one deep-dive on the implementation of the NDP held.
Indicators:

2.7. Number of public debates and round table discussion sessions held.



2.7. Support the implementation of the National Development Plan.

  • Appoint Project Manager and SDG Advisor.

  • Organise a strategic planning session for partners.

  • Organise three public debates.

  • Organise two round table discussions.

  • Conduct one deep dive.

X

X

X




X

X

X



x

X

X

x



X

X

X



DPME/UNDP

UNCT

Project Manager

120 000

97 000

23 000

Baseline:

2.8. Lack of initiatives to support youth to acquire digital skills.


Target:

2.8. Train 400 on digital skills, ICT skills and entrepreneurship skills and place 200 in employment/internship.


Indicators:

2.8. Number of young people recruited into the project.



2.8 Develop a programme of support to address youth unemployment

  • Finalise a project document on youth unemployment.

  • Mobilise resources for implementation of the project.

  • Sign project document with NYDA.

  • Sign Agreement with Accenture.

  • Implement the project in three provinces (KZN, NC and EC).

X

X

X



X

x

x

X





Accenture

Project manager, workshop, meetings

200 000

(in-kind contribution)




200 000

(in-kind contribution)



200 000

(in-kind contribution)



Baseline:

2.9. Lack reports that systematically track human development in the country.


Target:

2.9. Background paper on NDHR 2017.


Indicators:

2.9. Draft NHDR report.



2.9. Produce the NHDR for South Africa.

  • Draft terms of reference for the consultant.

  • Established a reference group.

  • Conduct training to government official and other stakeholders on developing the NHDR.

X

X

X





















20 000

20 000

20 000

Baseline:

2.10 Lack of capacity on coordinated trade integration, regional industrialisation and cross border infrastructure.


Target:

2.10. One strategic planning session held.


Indicator:

2.10. No of capacity building sessions ( short courses, seminars and degree courses) on trade and regional integration.



2.10. Conduct capacity building sessions on trade regional integration and industrialization.

X

X

x

x

Centre for Trade and Regional Integration

UCT


(b) University of Johannesburg

Project Budget

Staff Costs, Research and consultancy costs travel, events, knowledge products and publications


90 957.00


10 000

0


80 957.00

2.11. Organise policy dialogue session on regional industrialisation, trade integration and cross border infrastructure.

X

x

x

X

Centre for Trade and Regional Integration

UCT


(b) University of Johannesburg

Project Budget

Staff Costs, Research and consultancy costs travel, events, knowledge products and publications

163 722.60

0

163 722.60

Baseline:

2.12. Lack of coordinated strategies on regional industrialisation, trade integration and cross border infrastructure.


Target:

2.12. Policy Dialogue.


Indicator:

2.12. Number of policy dialogues held on regional industrialisation, trade integration and cross border infrastructure.



2.12 Organise policy dialogue session on regional industrialisation, trade integration and cross border infrastructure.

x

x

x

x

Centre for Trade and Regional Integration

UCT: --- Business school, law school, PRISM, --;

(b) University of Johannesburg (


Project Budget

Centre for Trade and Regional Integration

UCT: Business school, law school, PRISM,

(b) University of Johannesburg (


109 148.40

0

109 148.40

Baseline:

2.13. Lack of capacity to domesticate SDG.


Target:

2.13. Provide capacity building to domesticate SDG into national officials.


Indicator:

2.13. Number of workshops.



2.13 Provide support to Government to domesticate SDGs.













UNDP

Workshops/meetings

UNDP

20 000

20 000

20 000

Sub-Total

























$ 1 375 598.00

$998 770.00

$ 416 828.00

Output 3: Competitiveness of SMMEs increased through the Supplier Development Programme

Baseline:

3.1. Project Document finalised and MOU signed, but project document not yet signed; no institutional arrangements for implementing the project.

3.2 No corporates recruited to the project

3.3 No SMME recruited to the project

3.4. Absence of SDP-specific communication and resource mobilisation strategy

3.5. No programme evaluation

3.6 Unaffordability of the current website hosted and maintained by external provider

Indicators:

3.1. Cost Sharing Agreement/MOU/Project document signed between partners.

3.2. Agreements signed with corporates.

3.3. No of SMMEs and co-operatives assisted using the SDP Methodology.

3.4. Progress report on the communication and resource mobilisation strategies.

3.5. Evaluation repor.t

3.6. Report on progress made in developing the website.

Targets:


    1. Project Document signed.

    2. SDP officially launched.

    3. SDP Board ToRs finalised.

    4. Two to three big companies recruited to join the SDP.

    5. Targets and action plans for SDP partners (SBDI, Mtiya Dynamics and AMSCO) revised.

    6. SDP diagnostic tools implemented on at least 30 small & medium enterprises and 40 micro enterprises & co-operatives.

    7. SDP Partnership & Resource Mobilisation Strategy (PRMS) tailor-made based on CO strategy.

    8. PRMS actioned, funding secured for SDP.

    9. SDP Communication Strategy tailor-made based on CO strategy.

    10. Programme’s effectiveness evaluated to effect improvement

    11. New website developed and functional.

    12. Contract with U-soft renewed or terminated.

3.1 Establish institutional arrangement for the implementation of the project.

  • Meet with DSBD to review & sign the project document and formalize the governance structure following the signing of the MoU.

  • Review Draft ToRs for the Project Board and discuss with DSBD




X

X

X



X







UNDP, DSBD

UNDP, EU, DSBD, Private sector

Programme launch & marketing material

66 000

50 000

16 000

3.2 Corporates/big buyers recruited & Contracts signed to participate in the project

  • Identify two or three big buyer to sign up for the programme

  • Engage big buyer/corporate to signed up for the SDP

  • Meet with SBDI, Mtiya Dynamics & AMSCO to reignite the implementation of agreed- activities in recruiting big companies to join the SDP.

X

X


X

X





UNDP, DSBD, SBDI, Mtiya Dynamics & AMSCO

UNDP

In-house SDP Consultant’s fees










3.3 Implement the SDP Methodology/Capacity building intervention in suppliers (SMMEs)

  • Assessment of SMMEs conducted using Diagnostic Tool (DT)

  • Agree on selection criteria and identify SMME suppliers jointly with Corporates

  • SMME Improvement Plan Executed

  • Develop individual improvement plans for SMMEs and co-operatives

  • Agree on M&E indicators







X

X

X




UNDP, EU, DSBD, Private sector

Programme Management & SDP consultants’ fees (Mexico Model) – 2nd half of 2017

436,930

0

436,930

3.4 Develop a resource mobilisation and communication strategy

  • Draft resource mobilization strategy

  • Follow up with potential funders and partners to mobilize funding for the project (EU and GEP)

  • Explore other partnerships and opportunities for ED

  • Prepare and submit funding proposals as required

  • Prepare SDP marketing material (brochures, leaflets, etc.)

X

X

X



X

X

X

UNDP


UNDP, DSBD,

Consultant’s fees: in-house SDP Consultant










3.5. Undertake programme evaluation

  • Assess indicators of corporate procurement.

  • Assess Impact Indicators.

  • Integrate Lessons Learned and adjust programme if required.










X

UNDP, Corporates

UNDP, EU, DSBD, Private sector

SDP consultants’ fees included in 3.3










3.6. Develop an in-house SDP website.

  • Identify a software programmer to develop the website.

  • Identify a SDP Specialist to guide in developing the website.

  • Customise the content/material on the website.

  • Train team on using the website.

  • Renegotiate or terminate the existing contract with U-soft.

X

X


X

X


X

X

UNDP

UNDP, EU, DSBD, Private sector

Website development & management fees










Sub-Total

























502 930.00

50 000

452 930.00





































Total

























$2 153 528.00

$998 70.00

$1144 758.00

Yüklə 0,51 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin