Contents preface (VII) introduction 1—37



Yüklə 18,33 Mb.
səhifə313/489
tarix03.01.2022
ölçüsü18,33 Mb.
#50422
1   ...   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   ...   489
Fig. 11.8 Different canal alignments between offtake and watershed
When the crossing site is such that the canal FSL is well above the stream HFL the choice between aqueduct and siphon aqueduct is made depending on the stream discharge. For larger stream discharges (i.e., when the stream bed is much wider) an aqueduct is more suitable than a siphon aqueduct which requires lowering of the stream bed by a drop. Besides being costly, lowering of the bed may result in silting on the lowered stream bed which increases the risk of failure. However, an aqueduct necessitates heavy canal embankments towards the





CROSS-DRAINAGE STRUCTURES

385

crossing (Fig. 11.9). This is due to the wide flood cross-section of streams in plains and the requirements that the canal must be well above the HFL, and the aqueduct has to be constructed in a smaller part of the cross-section of the stream.


Canal bed

Stream H.F.L.




Canal

Waterway

Canal













embankment

at

embankment







crossing






Yüklə 18,33 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   ...   489




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin