Denov institute of entreprenuership and pedagogy social science and humanities department of englishlanguage and literature

Conclusion
The story tells us about one episode in the life of a very rich woman Rosemary Fell. She was used to spending money for any whims of hers. Katherine Mansfield described the scene how the shopkeeper flattered her taste of beauty: "You see, madam," he would explain in his low respectful tones, "I love my things. I would rather not part with them than sell them to someone who does not appreciate them, who has not that fine feeling which is so rare...". The seller asked for the thing (animated composition in the box) at a very high price and Rosemary espoused that the price didn’t shock her, she was able to buy everything that she wanted. This was a long introduction which was necessary for understanding the moral of the story. The key moment of the story occurred when Rosemary went out of the shop and a young girl asked her some money for a cup of tea. In response Rosemary acted unpredictably, she invited the girl to her home for a cup of tea.

While I was reading this part of Katherine Mansfield's story, another story appeared in my mind. It is a satirical story written by one of the most well-known and recognizable Russian writers Fyodor Dostoyevsky. "A Nasty Story". The story told how one very high-level person, the general, decided to visit the wedding of one of his subordinate and how bad it turned: the tension of awareness having so high boss ruined the celebration. The true intention of the participating in the wedding for the boss was probably the attempt to increase his self-appraisal. I think that Rosemary had the same motivation.

List of used literature
1 Marcella Frank, Modern English a Practical Reference Guide, (US: New York
University, 1972), P. 164
2. Zhalolov J. Methods of teaching foreign languages. Tashkent, Ukituvchi, 1996
3. Azizkhodjaeva N. N. Educational Technologies and Pedagogical Skills,Tashkent, 2003.
4. Ausubel, David. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston. Inc.
5. Blažek, Václav (2001) Indo-European Prepositions and Related Words: Internal Analysis and External Comparison. In: Linguistica Brunensia: Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské University, A: Řada Jazykovědná/Series Linguistica, Vol. 49, pp. 15-43
6. Bullokar, William (1586) Bref Grammar for English. London: Edmund Bollifant.
7. Bland K. S. (2004). Grammar Sense. Oxford University Press, USA.
8. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Roppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investingating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Boers, F. (1996). Spatial Prepositions and Metaphor: A cognitive semantic journey along the up-down and the front-back dimension. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
10. Boers, F. and M. Demecheleer. 1998. A cognitive semantic approach to teaching Prepositions. ELT Journal, 52, 3, 197-204.
11. Cobbett, William (1983) A Grammar of the English Language. The 1818 New York first edition with passages added in 1819, 1820, and 1823. Amsterdam: Rodopi

12. Clark, E. (1973). Nonlinguistic strategies in the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2, 161-182.

13. Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999) The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd edition).USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
14. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
15. Dewell, R. (1994). Over again: image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5(4), 351-380
16. Evans, V. (2007a). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
17. Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out Frequent Phrasal Verbs: A Corpus-Based Analysis. TESOL quarterly, 41(2), 339-359.
18. Geeraerts, D. (2007). Where does prototypicality come from? In V. Evans, B. Bergen & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader (pp. 168-185). London/Oakville: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
19. F. Gabdulxanov. Prospects in Development of The Methodology in Teaching Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan 2013
20. Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, E., Pullum, G., Sag, Ivan (1985) Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Lakoff, George. 1993. “Contemporary theory of metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edition, Andrew Ortony (ed), 202–251.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
24. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, i, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.