|
Table 8 (a) : Relevant Correlation Matrix of Gender Related Variables
|
| səhifə | 37/38 | | tarix | 05.01.2022 | | ölçüsü | 2,75 Mb. | | #72328 |
| Table 8 (a) : Relevant Correlation Matrix of Gender Related Variables
in Rural Districts of India in pooled data of 1991 & 2001
|
Correlations (pooled gender data matrix.sta)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TPMR
|
TPFR
|
SXAR
|
LRMR
|
LRFR
|
MWFR
|
AGLFR
|
GGIR
|
TD
|
TPFR
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SXAR
|
0.34
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LRMR
|
0.15
|
0.18
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LRFR
|
0.14
|
0.19
|
0.43
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
MWFR
|
-0.08
|
-0.08
|
0.03
|
-0.13
|
-0.10
|
|
|
|
|
AGLFR
|
0.28
|
0.29
|
0.27
|
-0.14
|
-0.25
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
GGIR
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
-0.22
|
-0.19
|
-0.34
|
0.19
|
0.34
|
|
|
TD
|
-0.10
|
-0.10
|
0.07
|
0.28
|
0.24
|
-0.04
|
-0.05
|
-0.22
|
|
REDUMYR
|
-0.06
|
-0.06
|
-0.16
|
0.37
|
0.39
|
0.12
|
-0.21
|
0.24
|
-0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 8 (b) : Relevant Correlation Matrix of Gender Related Variables in Urban Districts
|
|
of India in pooled data of 1991 & 2001
|
|
Correlations (pooled gender data matrix.sta)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TPMU
|
TPFU
|
SXAU
|
LRFU
|
MWFU
|
MPCEU
|
GGIU
|
TD
|
|
TPFU
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SXAU
|
0.01
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LRFU
|
0.13
|
0.16
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MWFU
|
-0.02
|
0.00
|
0.28
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPCEU
|
0.02
|
0.03
|
-0.02
|
0.40
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
GGIU
|
-0.15
|
-0.13
|
0.29
|
0.02
|
-0.09
|
-0.07
|
|
|
|
TD
|
0.01
|
0.00
|
0.19
|
0.28
|
0.15
|
0.35
|
-0.09
|
|
|
REDUMYU
|
0.01
|
0.02
|
-0.02
|
0.40
|
0.28
|
0.67
|
-0.04
|
0.10
|
|
Table 9(a):Factors Determining Sex Ratio (0-6) in Rural Districts of India in 2001
|
Independent
|
Regression Combinations
|
|
Varibles
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
II*
|
III
|
Intercept
|
1066.82(30.80)
|
1080.09 (31.15)
|
987.03 (26.77)
|
LRMR1
|
-5.13(-6.78)
|
-6.21 (-7.92)
|
-5.21 (-6.43)
|
LRFR1
|
4.97(7.55)
|
6.30 (8.84)
|
5.07 (7.36)
|
REDUMYR1
|
-38.89(-3.02)
|
-29.31 (-2.20)
|
-46.82 (-4.48)
|
MPCER1
|
-0.12(-3.85)
|
-0.12 (-3.51)
|
|
WPRFR1
|
.93(2.44)
|
1.18 (3.26)
|
1.24 (3.00)
|
LRSR1
|
178.39(3.00)
|
|
|
AGLFR1
|
|
.86 (3.29)
|
.97 (3.16)
|
HCRR1
|
|
|
0.56 (2.31)
|
GGIR1
|
|
|
-3.70 (-1.52)
|
Adjusted R2
|
0.47
|
0.51
|
0.49
|
F-value
|
19.97 (6,120)
|
22.29 (6,119)
|
18.10(7,119)
|
p of estimate
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Notes: Figures in parentheses are t-statistics.
|
|
* Gurgaon (the richest district in India in 2004-05 located
|
|
|
in Haryana state) is deleted as outlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 9(b): Factors Determining Female Work
|
Participation Rate in Rural Districts of India in 2001
|
Independent
|
Regression Combinations
|
|
|
Varibles
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
II
|
III
|
Intercept
|
41.99 (9.87)
|
34.35 (7.31)
|
46.13 (11.43)
|
LRFR1
|
-0.33 (-5.22)
|
|
-0.33 (-5.67)
|
REDUMYR1
|
4.98 (2.17)
|
8.02 (2.57)
|
4.89 (2.31)
|
MPCER1
|
|
-0.02 (-2.78)
|
|
HCRR1
|
0.14 (2.82)
|
0.15 (2.58)
|
0.11 (2.35)
|
GGIR1
|
2.12 (4.78)
|
2.56 (5.54)
|
1.03 (2.18)
|
MUSLFR1
|
|
|
-0.27 (-4.66)
|
Adjusted R2
|
.45
|
.37
|
0.53
|
F-value
|
26.73 (4,122)
|
19.23 (4,122)
|
29.35 (5,121)
|
p of estimate
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Table 10(a): Factors Determining Sex Ratio(0-6) in Urban Districts of India in 2001
|
Independent
|
Regression Combinations
|
|
|
|
|
Varibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
II
|
III
|
IV
|
V
|
VI*
|
Intercept
|
1018.29 (6.94)
|
1021.46 (6.97)
|
1076.04 (7.35)
|
935.65 (13.11)
|
971.73 (31.14)
|
992.38(31.19)
|
LRMU1
|
-6.57 (2.48)
|
-6.54 (-2.48 )
|
-6.47 (-2.49)
|
|
|
|
LRFU1
|
5.51 (3.84)
|
5.42 (3.79)
|
4.83 (3.38)
|
0.39 (0.55)
|
|
|
REDUMYU1
|
-8.96 (-.78)
|
|
|
|
|
|
HCRU1
|
0.86 (3.17)
|
0.92 (3.55)
|
0.79 (3.01)
|
0.54 (2.31)
|
0.48(2.32)
|
0.48 (2.29)
|
GGIU1
|
|
|
3.87 (2.20)
|
|
|
|
WPRFU1
|
3.92 (2.72)
|
3.66 (2.61)
|
3.48 (2.52)
|
3.41 (2.69)
|
3.48(2.77)
|
3.19(2.53)
|
SIKHFU1
|
-9.91 (-4.73)
|
-10.40 (-5.20)
|
-11.57 (-5.68)
|
-9.05 (-5.14)
|
-9.23(-5.37)
|
-10.76 (-5.11)
|
JAINFU1
|
|
|
|
-23.14 (-4.98)
|
-23.95(-5.44)
|
-24.20 (-5.55)
|
HINDUFU1
|
|
|
|
-1.07 (-3.22)
|
-1.14(-3.72)
|
-1.32 (-3.86)
|
Adjusted R2
|
0.34
|
0.34
|
0.36
|
0.46
|
0.46
|
0.47
|
F-value
|
11.62 (6, 119)
|
13.86 (5, 120)
|
12.72 (6, 119)
|
18.52(6,119)
|
22.30(5,120)
|
22.66 (5,118)
|
p of estimate
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Notes:
|
* Two districts, Tinsukia (Assam) & Sirsa (Haryana) are deleted as outliers.
|
|
Table 10(a) contd.: Factors Determining Sex Ratio(0-6) in
|
Urban Districts of India in 2001
|
Independent
|
Regression Combinations
|
|
|
Varibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
VII*
|
VIII
|
IX**
|
X
|
Intercept
|
898.84(17.97)
|
967.91(34.05)
|
875.71 (55.22)
|
965.00 (33.65)
|
MWFU1
|
4.17(2.36)
|
4.68(2.82)
|
5.15 (2.91)
|
5.85 (3.44)
|
REDUMYU1
|
|
|
-24.09 (-2.51)
|
-20.24 (-2.14)
|
HCRU1
|
0.55(2.79)
|
|
|
|
CHRISFU1
|
1.02(1.37)
|
|
1.50 (2.52)
|
|
SIKHFU1
|
-8.16(-4.63)
|
-9.16(-5.52)
|
-7.44 (-4.08)
|
-8.82 (-5.03)
|
JAINFU1
|
-25.62(-5.72)
|
-26.42(-6.08)
|
-26.53 (-5.95)
|
-27.89 (-6.42)
|
MUSLFU1
|
0.91(1.53)
|
|
1.07 (2.84)
|
|
HINDUFU1
|
-0.41(-0.82)
|
-1.10(-3.73)
|
|
-0.93 (-3.29)
|
BUDHFU1
|
18.74(2.29)
|
16.88(2.08)
|
21.29 (2.59)
|
18.57 (2.26)
|
Adjusted R2
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.49
|
F-value
|
16.80(8,117)
|
21.75(6,119)
|
18.87 (7,118)
|
20.93 (6,119)
|
p of estimate
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Notes: * HINDUFU1 & MUSLFU1 generate correl coeff of -0.69,
|
|
|
all others being highly insignificant.
|
|
|
**all the correlation coefficients are highly insignificant in the
|
|
|
relevant correlation matrix
|
|
|
Table 10(b): Factors Determining Female Work
|
|
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|
