| Discussion and conclusion:
This LS was noted.
TD S2 160029 LS from CT WG1: Reply LS on ProSe UE to Network relay. (CT WG1)
Abstract: CT WG1 thanks RAN WG2 for their LS (C1-154060/R2-154998) on 'ProSe UE-to-Network relay'. CT WG1 has discussed all the topics in the LS and would like to provide the following feedbacks:. [Question#1 from RAN WG2] SA WG2/CT WG1 is kindly asked to discuss the desirable /required operations from upper layer point of view and provide feedback to RAN WG2, if any. [Feedback from CT WG1] CT WG1 decides to wait for SA WG2 conclusion. [Question#2 from RAN WG2] SA WG2/CT WG1 is kindly asked to discuss if this is acceptable and provide feedback to RAN WG2, if any. [Feedback from CT WG1] CT WG1 agrees the ProSe UE-to-Network relay selected by remote UE shall fulfil both the AS layer criteria and upper layer criteria and it is up to the UE implementation whether the upper layer or the AS layer takes the final selection on which ProSe UE-to-network relay UE to select. Detailed operations related to the relay selection and reselection is captured in the attached agreed CR (C1-154703). [Question#3 from RAN WG2] SA WG2/CT WG1 is kindly asked to consider these agreements and provide feedback (e.g. on the size of the addresses/IDs) to RAN WG2, if any. [Feedback from CT WG1] CT WG1 confirms that the size of the Layer 2 unicast address is 24 bits.
Convenors comment: Proposed to be noted as CC for SA WG2.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
