Resolution resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Violations


C. THE AFFIRMATIVE INTERPRETATION IS BAD FOR DEBATE



Yüklə 474,04 Kb.
səhifə14/190
tarix05.01.2022
ölçüsü474,04 Kb.
#66889
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   ...   190

C. THE AFFIRMATIVE INTERPRETATION IS BAD FOR DEBATE

Limits are necessary for negative preparation and clash, and their interpretation makes the topic too big. Permitting reduction by effect is unlimiting. All sorts of things affect surveillance. For example, the economy affects government spending and budgeting for surveillance, and just about everything affects the economy.



D. T IS A VOTER because the opportunity to prepare promotes better debating



NOT SUBSTANTIALLY NOT TOPICAL




T – SUBSTANTIALLY

A. SUBSTANTIALLY REQUIRES AT LEAST A 2% REDUCTION --- THIS IS THE SMALLEST PERCENTAGE WE COULD FIND



Word and Phrases 1960

 'Substantial" means "of real worth and importance; of considerable value; valuable." Bequest to charitable institution, making 1/48 of expenditures in state, held exempt from taxation; such expenditures constituting "substantial" part of its activities. Tax Commission of Ohio v. American Humane Education Soc., 181 N.E. 557, 42 Ohio App.



Yüklə 474,04 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   ...   190




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin