1
|
The NDR will support creation of a Litter at the time of Service.
The NDR will support updating of a Litter at the time of Whelping.
The NDR will support updating of a Litter at the time of Registration.
|
|
|
2
|
The authority which provides notification of Service is the initial Owning Authority of a Litter.
Owning Authority of a Litter passes to the authority which provides notification of Whelping (where this is different from the authority which provided notification of Service).
|
|
|
3
|
Earbrand is the primary business identifier for a Dog.
|
If another identifier, e.g. microchip, becomes the primary identifier in future, this will necessitate modification to the NDR and its interface.
|
|
4
|
Where multiple Sires are involved in creating a Litter, separate Litter records are created in the NDR for each Sire.
|
The following considerations apply to State Body Systems (e.g. those that are part of OzChase) that internally maintain a Service / Litter record with multiple Sires:
When transferring data from the State Body System to the NDR, the State Body System Litter record needs to be split into separate NDR Litter records for each Sire. Given that the association between pups and Sires is only established at the time of Litter Registration, this implies that multiple Sire Litters cannot be notified to the NDR prior to Litter Registration.
When receiving data from the NDR, the State Body System may choose to merge individual NDR Litter records into a single multiple Sire Litter record. Any NDR Litter records that have the same Dam, the same Service Date, but a different Sire, can be merged into a single multiple Sire Litter record.
|
|
5
|
The NDR will maintain Late Name as part of the Dog Entity.
The NDR will record when a name is re-used.
|
GA is responsible for Dog naming, including maintaining Late Name, and managing re-use of names.
This information may be required by State Bodies in publishing Form Guides.
|
|
6
|
The NDR will maintain a maximum of two microchips per dog.
|
This caters for the situation where a greyhound is re-chipped, when it is not possible to locate the original microchip. Both microchips may end up still being readable and are therefore valid.
|
|
7
|
The NDR will maintain a “stud sire” flag on a Dog.
|
Required by GA.
|
|
8
|
The NDR will maintain a history of the previous owners and the previous trainers of a Dog.
|
|
|
9
|
As part of Race results, the NDR will maintain the Name, Owner and Trainer of a Dog that was current at the time of the race.
|
This information is needed for the Stud Book.
|
|
10
|
Within Race results, “Position in Running (PIR)” is a free text field.
|
There is no guarantee that State Bodies will use this field in a consistent or compatible manner.
|
Rejected. See point 21
|
11
|
It is the responsibility of a State Body to determine whether a Person already exists in the NDR prior to creating a new Person Entity in the NDR.
|
State Bodies will need to adopt appropriate matching procedures (e.g. using full name, date of birth, etc) to determine whether an individual is already present in the NDR.
|
|
12
|
The NDR needs to be able to maintain an “Authority to Breed” on a Dam (with respect to Frozen Semen Service).
|
“Authority to Breed” is maintained by the State Bodies, but needs to be available in the GA portal.
|
|
13
|
The NDR needs to be able to maintain an “Authority to Bred” / “Stud Master” on a Sire.
|
|
|
14
|
Dogs will be automatically created in the NDR when a Litter is registered.
|
State Bodies never need to create a Dog in the NDR.
GA will still need to create Dogs in the NDR, when Dogs are imported from overseas.
|
|
15a
|
A Penalty on a Person can only be cleared by the authority that applied the penalty.
|
There may be more than one Penalty on a person at the same time – especially if more than authority apply a different penalty type.
|
|
15b
|
A Penalty on a Dog can be cleared by any authority.
Clearance will depend on the Penalty type and trial track requirements.
|
This enables a Satisfactory trial to be performed in a state other than the one that applied the original penalty.
|
|
16
|
The NDR will not provide a means of moving a Group from one authority to another.
Note: this item is still under consideration, and may change if Business Rules can be defined describing the expected behaviour.
|
If a Group (e.g. a Syndicate) moves interstate, and wishes to be recognised in the NDR in the new state, they need to create a new registration for the Group in their new state.
|
Rejected. See point 20
|
17
|
As part of Race results, the NDR will record the time of each Dog.
|
|
|
18
|
Any authority may update the following details of a Dog:
Microchip number(s)
Certificate number
Lifestate (e.g. racing / retired / deceased)
|
These attributes will usually be updated in the state where the greyhound is racing.
|
|
19
|
The NDR will only store persons who are registered as Owners or Trainers.
|
Other categories of Person will need to be maintained in the State Body Systems.
|
|
20
|
The NDR will allow a Group to move from one authority to another.
|
A group will change authority when the residential address of the manager of the group changes state. E.g. SA to QLD.
|
|
21
|
Within Race results, “Position in Running (PIR)” is a string field made up of numeric vales.
|
PIR can be recorded in a consistent form, regardless of how states record other race comments such as speed and checks.
|
|
22
|
Within Race results, “Comments” is a free text field.
|
There is no guarantee that State Bodies will use this field in a consistent or compatible manner.
|
|
23
|
Historical prize money other won by a dog will not be migrated (where available) from the old NDR to the new NDR.
|
Prize money other (breeder bonus, trophy) in the existing NDR is incomplete and would provide an incorrect prize money total.
|
|
24
|
Parameters for Data Migration from the old NDR to the new NDR are as follows:
Dog – Whelped on or after 01 January 2000
Litter – Whelped on or after 01 January 2000
Person/Group – Has an expiry date greater than now or the person/group is linked to any of the Dog/Litter records described above
Meeting/Results – Meetings held on or after 01 January 2005
Penalties – all created since 01/01/2009.
|
|
|
25
|
Margin for the first dog is the margin the dog beat the 2nd dog by (or 3rd dog for a dead heat). Margin is in dog length(s).
|
Provides richer race result information for the winning dog
|
|
26
|
Remove defined margin distances
|
Actual margin distance can be recorded without the need for rounding the margin, thus increasing the accuracy of the margin.
|
|
27
|
The clearing of a penalty where a dog has performed a satisfactory trial in a state different to the state that imposed the penalty
|
Any state can update or clear a dog penalty even if they didn’t impose the penalty – as long as the clearance requirements are met.
|
20/02/2103
|
28
|
For the sake of dog Pedigree in the NDR, change the NDR schema to allow “UnknownInternationalPerson” to be stored against an Internationally-bred dog as an Owner.
|
As dog Owner is mandatory, this allows the parents of imported dogs to be recorded in the NDR for the sake of Pedigree – without having to know the owners details.
This means the UnknownInternationalParty will not be displayed as part of previous Owner History of a DOG.
|
27/03/2013
|
29
|
To soft delete incorrect entities created in NDR, change the NDR schema by adding in “entityStatus” to indicate if an entity is deleted.
|
Only owning authority of the entity can perform this action.
|
|
