A.1.Overview and scope
The National Hospital Cost Data Collection (NHCDC) is the primary data collection that the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) relies on to calculate the National Efficient Price used for the funding of public hospital services. To ensure that the quality of NHCDC data is robust and fit-for-purpose, IHPA commissions an annual validation process to verify that all participating hospitals have included appropriate costs and patient activity.
IHPA engaged KPMG to undertake the Round 19 independent financial review (IFR) of a sample of state and territory hospitals who supplied data to the Round 19 NHCDC (2014-15). KPMG were also engaged to undertake the Round 18 IFR. The Round 19 IFR includes:
Assessment of the accuracy and completeness of the NHCDC participating hospitals reconciliations provided for Round 19.
Assessment of the consistency between jurisdictions sampled of the application of Version 3.1 of the Australian Hospital Patient Costing Standards (AHPCS) in selected standards, as highlighted in Appendix I.
Review of the data flow from the health service to the jurisdictional upload of hospital information, to the data submission portal, through to the storing of data in IHPA’s national database.
As this review is not an audit, no assurance on the completeness or accuracy of the costing has been provided. The outcomes and results rely heavily on the representations, assertions and data submissions made by the hospital or local hospital network (LHN) costing teams and jurisdiction representatives. Procedures performed were limited to the review of supporting schedules, agreeing to source documentation (where possible), discussions with costing teams and obtaining extracts from costing systems.
Each of the eight jurisdictions agreed to participate in the IFR for Round 19. Jurisdictions were requested to nominate hospitals or LHNs based on the following sampling framework:
Historical participation - provides an opportunity to review new sites, or review a hospital or LHN that has previously participated in the IFR to enable progress to be tracked over time.
Size - as assessed by volume and the scope of work undertaken.
Materiality - the total cost submitted to the NHCDC by the hospital.
Systems - the types of costing systems utilised in preparing the submission, and potentially extending to the types of feeder systems available.
Other factors - where sites had previously participated and identified focus areas such as Emergency Department costing or overhead allocations, or other potential areas such as previously identified governance, control or capability issues.
In total, a sample of 18 sites, including 15 hospitals and three LHNs were selected by jurisdictions to participate in the IFR.
Table – Round 19 IFR participating hospitals/LHNs
Jurisdiction
|
Hospital
|
Characteristics
|
Australian Capital Territory
|
The Canberra Hospital
| -
Participated in Round 17 NHCDC IFR
-
Major urban hospital
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
New South Wales
|
Central Coast Local Health District (LHD)
| -
LHD has previously not participated in an NHCDC IFR
-
Includes major regional hospitals
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
New South Wales
|
Far West Local Health District
| -
LHD has previously not participated in an NHCDC IFR
-
Includes major rural hospitals
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
New South Wales
|
Sydney Local Health District
| -
Participated in Round 17 NHCDC IFR
-
Includes major urban teaching hospitals
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
Northern Territory
|
Alice Springs Hospital
| |
Queensland
|
Gold Coast University Hospital
| |
Queensland
|
Toowoomba Base Hospital
| |
Queensland
|
Logan Hospital
| -
Hospital has previously not participated in an IFR
-
Major urban hospital and teaching hospital
-
Costing system – Transition II
|
South Australia
|
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
| -
Participated in Round 14 NHCDC IFR
-
Major urban and teaching hospital
|
South Australia
|
Royal Adelaide Hospital
| -
Participated in Round 16 NHCDC IFR
-
Major urban and teaching hospital
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
Tasmania
|
North West Regional Hospital
| -
Hospital has previously not participated in an IFR
-
Large regional hospital
-
Costing system – User Cost
|
Tasmania
|
Mersey Community Hospital
| -
Hospital has previously not participated in an IFR
-
Regional hospital
-
Costing system – User Cost
|
Victoria
|
Ballarat Health Service
| -
Hospital has previously not participated in an IFR
-
Major regional hospital
-
Costing system – Visasys
|
Victoria
|
Eastern Health
| -
Hospital has previously not participated in an IFR
-
Major urban, teaching and research hospital
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
Victoria
|
Latrobe Regional Hospital
| -
Hospital has previously not participated in an IFR
-
Major regional hospital
-
Costing system – Adaptive costing
|
Western Australia
|
Armadale Kelmscott Memorial Hospital
| -
Participated in Round 16 NHCDC IFR
-
Large urban hospital
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
Western Australia
|
Kununurra Hospital
| -
Hospital has previously not participated in an IFR
-
Small regional hospital
-
Costing system – PPM2
|
|
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
| |
Source: KPMG
Dostları ilə paylaş: |