Format for Best Teacher Assessment
(To be filled by the Teacher)
(Assessment period - 01 January 2012 to 31 December, 2016)
Name of the Faculty :
Total length of teaching at UG and PG level : ............................................. Years.
Academic Achievements:
-
(a) Number of courses taught by the Faculty member (Please enclose list of course)
Courses Taught
|
Titles of the Course
|
Credit Hours
|
Contact hours per week
|
Nos. Of Teachers involved
|
1st Semester
|
IInd Semester
|
a)U.G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) P.G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. (b) No. of Lectures actually taken at P.G. and U.G. level for last 5 years.
Lecture Taken
|
Years
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
P.G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Specific efforts made for improving teaching methodology
Material
|
UG/PG
|
Title of the courses
|
a) Manual Prepared
|
|
|
b)Audio Visual prepared
|
|
|
c)Instructional material/ Aid developed
|
|
|
d)Innovations in teaching student discussion, Term Papers
|
|
|
e)Seminars
|
|
|
f)Course outline / Lesson plan given to student
|
|
|
g)Contribution made to the development of course Curriculum
|
|
|
-
(a) No. of students guided M.Sc./PhD (Year wise) those who received degree in the last 5 years.
Name of Students
|
Degree
|
Thesis Title
|
Name of the Institute
|
Year of Passing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Research Projects carried out
Title of the Project
|
Name of the Funding Agency
|
Comparative Mode/ Assigned
|
PI/Co
PI
|
Duration
|
Amount (Rs. in lakh)
|
Significant achievement (50 words)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Any Training programme ( related to teaching ) conducted in last 5 years
SL. No.
|
Title of the training programme
|
Duration and date
|
Funding Agency
|
Number of Participants
|
Role Played as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Publication:
a) Publication out of student thesis (enclose one set of reprints.)
Sl. No.
|
Title of the thesis
|
Name of the author(s)
|
Title of the paper
|
Year of publication with journal, volume & pages
|
NAAS (2015) ID
|
NAAS (2015) Score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Publication out of research work other than student thesis during last 5 years from non-student research (enclose one set of reprints.)
Sl. No.
|
Name of the author(s)
|
Title of the paper
|
Year of publication with journal, volume & pages
|
NAAS (2015)ID
|
NAAS (2015) Score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) Books (Title, authors, publishers, pages)
d) Book Chapters (Title, book title, publishers, page numbers)
6. Information about any student of the Faculty Member having won medal or ICAR
Thesis Award/INSA Award/Society Award for thesis Work.
7. Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals (Provide detail information)
Signature of the applicant
Format for Best Scientist Assessment
(To be filled by the Scientist)
(Assessment period - 01 January 2012 to 31 December, 2016)
Name of the Faculty :
Total length of Research : ............................................. Years.
Research Achievements :
-
(a) Research Projects carried out (Institutional Projects)
Title of the Project
|
Name of the Funding Agency
|
Comparative Mode/ Assigned
|
PI/Co
PI
|
Duration
|
Amount (Rs. in lakh)
|
Significant achievement (50 words)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 (b) Research Projects carried out (Competitive grants)
Title of the Project
|
Name of the Funding Agency
|
Comparative Mode/ Assigned
|
PI/Co
PI
|
Duration
|
Amount (Rs. in lakh)
|
Significant achievement (50 words)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 (c) Any Training programme ( related to research ) conducted in last 5 years
SL. No.
|
Title of the training programme
|
Duration and date
|
Funding Agency
|
Number of Participants
|
Role Played as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Publication:
a) Publication from Research (enclosed one set of reprints.)
Sl. No.
|
Title of the thesis
|
Name of the author(s)
|
Title of the paper
|
Year of publication with journal, volume & pages
|
NAAS (2015) ID
|
NAAS (2015) Score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Books (Title, authors, publishers, pages)
c) Book Chapters (Title, book title, publishers, page numbers)
3. Technology Developed
Sl. No.
|
No. and Name of the technology
|
Year of recommendation
|
Whether commercialized or not?
|
Area/Region for which recommended
|
Probable adoption of the technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Organizational Capacity
a) Seminars, Conferences, Symposia, Workshops Organized
Name of the Seminar/Conference/Symposia/Workshops etc.
|
Name of the Sponsoring Agency
|
Place & Date
|
|
|
|
b) Membership of Journals/Professional Society/ Editorship of Journals/Professional Society:
c) Seminars, Conferences, Symposia Workshops etc. Attended
Title of the Seminar/Conference/Symposia/Workshops, place and Date
|
Presented Paper (Proceedings)
|
Acted as Chairman/Co-Chairman of a Session
|
|
|
|
5. Information about any student of the Faculty Member having won medal or ICAR Thesis Award/INSA Award/Society Award for thesis Work
6. Editor/members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals (provide details information).
7. Patent/IPR obtained/applied : (Provide details with documentary evidence)
Signature of the applicant
Format for Best Extension Personnel Assessment
(To be filled by the Extension Personnel)
(Assessment period – 01 January, 2012 to 31 December, 2016)
Name of the Faculty :
Research Achievements :
-
Involvement in research project (allotted research project/ externally funded project)
Sl.
No.
|
Project title
|
Involvement as
|
Funding Authority
|
Impact/Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(a) Technology development/ dissemination (Development/ replacement of technology/ participatory
technology development, concept, methodology, GI, patent etc. )
-
Technology Assessment/ Refinement
Sl.
No.
|
Technology
|
Assessed/ Refined
|
Year
|
Impact/Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(a) Experience in field level extension (problem solving)
Sl.
No.
|
Involvement as
|
From
|
To
|
Years
|
Awards if any
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Demonstrations conducted
Sl. No.
|
Crop/Technology
|
No(s).
|
Area (ha)
|
Year
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Vocational training conducted
Sl.
No.
|
Title of course
|
Funding Authority
|
Duration
|
Year
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Extension workshop/ Symposia attended (other than KVK Zonal & Annual Workshop)
Sl.
No.
|
Name
|
Regional
|
National
|
International
|
AAU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Organisation of training programmes of 5 days or more duration (other than KVK training)
Sl. No.
|
Course Title
|
Duration
|
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
-
Contribution in village cluster/ speciality village development
Sl. No.
|
Name of village
|
Speciality
|
Technology Injected
|
Spread/Extent
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Adoption of village
Sl. No.
|
Name of village
|
Involved as
|
Technology injected
|
|
|
|
| -
Exhibition organised
Sl. No.
|
Title of the Exhibition
|
Year
|
Organised by
|
Place
|
|
|
|
|
| -
Publication(s)
-
Research paper :
-
Books :
-
Book Chapters :
-
Bulletins :
-
Popular Article :
-
Newsletters :
-
Use of ICT in Extension
-
Website :
-
SMS service :
-
Mobile solution :
-
Institution Building (Lab development, Farm development, Demonstration unit) :
Sl. No.
|
Development/Building of
|
Utilization
|
Return earned if any
|
|
|
|
|
-
Editor/Member of Editorial Board (Newsletter/ Farm Magazine/ Training Manual)
-
Success story developed
Sl. No.
|
Name of ther person(s)/group(s)
|
Involvement as
|
Technology
|
Where Published
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of the applicant
APPLICATION GUIDELINE
NOTES:
-
Once Awarded Teachers will not be eligible for next 5 consecutive academic years.
-
Newly Recruited Teachers will be eligible after completion of 5 Year.
TEACHING:
1. Number of courses taught: Marks will be assigned based on Total contact hours, 1 mark for every contact hour (Maximum marks 20).
2. Specific efforts made for improving teaching methodology (Maximum marks 10)
a) Manual Prepared: 1 mark for each manual prepared for each course
b) Audio Visual prepared: 1 mark for each audio visual prepared for each course
c) Instructional material/ Aid developed: 1 mark for each Instruction material/aid developed for each course
d) Innovations in teaching student discussion, Term Papers: 0.5 marks for each term paper
e) Seminars 0.5 marks for each seminar assigned
f) Course outline / Lesson plan given to student: 0.5 marks for each lesson plan for each course
g) Contribution made to the development of course Curriculum: 0.5 marks for each course curriculum development
3 (a) No. of students guided M.Sc./PhD: 3 marks for each Ph. D students guided, 2 marks for each M. Sc students guided (Maximum marks 10)
3 (b) Research Projects carried out: 3 marks for each project handled as PI, 1 mark for each project handled as Co-PI (Maximum marks 10)
4. Training programme conducted: 2.5 marks per training conducted (Maximum marks 5)
5 (a) & (b). Publication: Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication (5 a. Maximum marks 10, 5 b Maximum marks 5)
5 (c) & (d). Books and Books chapters: 3 marks per book , 1 mark per book chapter (Maximum marks 5)
6. Awards and medals: 2.5 marks for each award (Maximum marks 5)
7. Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals: 1 mark for each involvement (Maximum marks 3)
8. Current student’s evaluation (10 marks)
9. Alumni’s evaluation (7 marks)
RESEARCH:
1. (a) Research Projects carried out: 3 marks for each project handled as PI, 1 mark for each project handled as Co-PI (Maximum marks 10)
1. (b). Competitive projects obtained: 3 marks for each project handled as PI,1 marks for each project handled as Co- PI (Maximum marks 10)
1. (c) Training programme conducted: 5 marks per training conducted (Maximum marks 10)
2 Publication: Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication multiplied by 1 for First author or 0.75 for rest of the authors (2 a. Maximum marks 10)
2 (b) & (c). Books and Books chapters: 3 marks per book , 1 mark per book chapter (Maximum marks 5)
3. Technology developed: 2 marks for each technology developed as PI, 1 mark for each technology developed as Co-PI (Maximum marks 10)
4 (a). Organizational capacity: 2.5 marks for each. (Maximum marks 10)
4 (b). Membership of Journals: 1 mark for each involvement. (Maximum marks 5)
4 (c). Seminar, conferences etc attended. 1 mark for each involvement (Maximum marks 10)
5. Awards and medals: 2.5 marks for each award (Maximum marks 5)
6. Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals: 1 mark for each involvement (Maximum marks 5)
7. Patent/IPR obtained/applied: 3 marks for patent obtained, 1 marks for patent applied (Maximum marks 10)
Extension:
-
Involvement in research project: 3 marks for each Research Project handled as PI. 1 mark for each project as Co-PI (Maximum marks 5)
-
a. Technology development/ dissemination: 2 marks each as PI, 1 mark each as Co-PI (Maximum marks 5)
2 b. Technology Assessment/ Refinement: 1 mark (Maximum marks 5)
-
a. Experience in field level extension: 1 mark for each year (Maximum marks 10)
-
b. Demonstrations conducted: 2 marks per demonstration (Maximum marks 10)
-
c. Vocational training conducted: 1 mark for each training (Maximum marks 10)
3 d. Extension workshop/ Symposia attended (other than KVK Zonal & Annual Workshop): 1 marks for each training (Maximum marks 5)
3 e. Organisation of training programmes of 5 days or more duration (other than KVK training): 1 marks for each training (Maximum marks 3)
-
Contribution in village cluster/ speciality village development: 1.5 marks for each cluster (Maximum marks 5)
-
Adoption of village: 1.0 marks for each cluster (Maximum marks 5)
-
Exhibition organised: 2 marks for each exhibition (Maximum marks 7)
-
Publication(s):
-
Research paper: 2 marks as main author , 1 marks as co-author (Maximum marks 5)
-
Books: 3 marks per book c. Book Chapters: 1 mark for each book chapter (Maximum marks 5)
-
Bulletins/Popular Article/ Newsletters: 1 marks for each (Maximum marks 5)
-
Use of ICT in Extension: 1 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 4)
-
Institution Building: 1 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 3 )
-
Editor/Member of Editorial Board: 1 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 3)
-
Success story developed: 2 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 5)
SCORE SHEET AND SCORING GUIDE (TEACHING)
Sl. No.
|
Head of assessment
|
Maximum marks allotted
|
Scoring guideline
|
Marks obtained by the candidate
|
1
|
Number of courses taught
|
20
|
Marks will be assigned based on Total contact hours. 1 mark for every contact hour
|
|
2
|
Improving teaching methodology
|
10
|
As per the guideline provided
|
|
3 (a)
|
No. of students guided M.Sc./PhD
|
10
|
3 marks for each Ph. D students guided
2 marks for each M. Sc students guided
|
|
3( b)
|
Research Projects carried out
|
10
|
3 marks for each project handled as PI
1 marks for each project handled as Co-PI
|
|
4
|
Training programme conducted
|
5
|
2.5 marks per training conducted
|
|
5 (a)
|
Publication out of student's thesis
|
10
|
Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication
|
|
5 (b)
|
Publication out of research work other than student's thesis
|
5
|
Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication
|
|
5 (c) & (d)
|
Books and Books chapters
|
5
|
3 marks per book
1 mark per book chapter
|
|
6
|
Awards
|
5
|
2.5 marks for each award
|
|
7
|
Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals
|
3
|
1 mark for each involvement
|
|
8
|
Current student’s evaluation
|
10
|
Average of current student's assessment as per the score sheet at
|
|
9
|
Alumni's assessment
|
7
|
Average of Alumni's assessment as per the score sheet at
|
|
|
Total Score
|
100
|
|
|
10
|
Faculty level committee evaluation
|
50
|
A faculty level committee will be constituted by the Dean, FA for the evaluation (Based on a score sheet as Annexure A)
|
|
11
|
Seminar Evaluation
|
50
|
At this stage three candidates will be shortlisted based on the above ranking (1st, 2nd, 3rd).
The three shortlisted candidates will deliver Faculty level seminar on a specified date. A panel of 5 member selection committee will select the best teacher from the three candidates (Based on a score sheet as Annexure B)
|
|
SCORE SHEET AND SCORING GUIDE (RESEARCH)
Sl. No.
|
Head of assessment
|
Maximum marks allotted
|
Scoring guideline
|
Marks obtained by the candidate
|
1( a)
|
Research Projects carried out (Institutional)
|
10
|
3 marks for each project handled as PI
1 marks for each experiment conducted
|
|
1 (b)
|
Research Projects carried out (Competitive)
|
10
|
3 marks for each project handled as PI
1 marks for each experiment conducted
|
|
1 (c)
|
Training programme conducted
|
10
|
5 marks per training conducted
|
|
2 (a)
|
Publication out of research work
|
10
|
Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication
|
|
2 (b) & (c)
|
Books and Books chapters
|
5
|
3 marks per book
1 mark per book chapter
|
|
3
|
Technology developed
|
10
|
2 marks for each technology developed as PI
1 marks for each technology developed as Co-PI
|
|
4 (a)
|
Organizational capacity (Seminars, conference etc)
|
10
|
2.5 marks for each involvement
|
|
4 (b)
|
Membership of Journals
|
5
|
1 mark for each involvement
|
|
4 (c)
|
Seminars conferences etc attended
|
10
|
1 mark for each involvement
|
|
5
|
Awards
|
5
|
2.5 marks for each award
|
|
6
|
Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals
|
5
|
1 mark for each involvement
|
|
7
|
Patent/IPR obtained/applied
|
10
|
3 marks for patent obtained, 1 marks for patent applied
|
|
|
Total Score
|
100
|
|
|
8
|
Faculty level committee evaluation
|
50
|
A faculty level committee will be constituted by the Dean, FA for the evaluation (Based on a score sheet as Annexure A)
|
|
9
|
Seminar Evaluation
|
50
|
At this stage three candidates will be shortlisted based on the above ranking (1st, 2nd, 3rd).
The three shortlisted candidates will deliver Faculty level seminar on a specified date. A panel of 5 member selection committee will select the best teacher from the three candidates (Based on a score sheet as Annexure B)
|
|
SCORE SHEET AND SCORING GUIDE (EXTENSION PERSONNEL)
Sl. No.
|
Head of assessment
|
Maximum marks allotted
|
Scoring guideline
|
Marks obtained by the candidate
|
1
|
Involvement in research project
|
5
|
3 marks for each Research Project handled as PI. 1 mark for each project as Co-PI
|
|
2 (a)
|
Technology development/ dissemination
|
5
|
2 marks each as PI
1 mark each as Co-PI
|
|
2 (b)
|
Technology Assessment/ Refinement
|
5
|
1 mark
|
|
3 (a)
|
Experience in field level extension
|
10
|
1 mark for each year
|
|
3 (b)
|
Demonstrations conducted
|
10
|
2 marks per demonstration
|
|
3 (c)
|
Vocational training conducted
|
10
|
1 mark for each training
|
|
3 (d)
|
Extension workshop/ Symposia attended (other than KVK Zonal & Annual Workshop)
|
5
|
1 marks for each training
|
|
3 (e)
|
Organisation of training programmes of 5 days or more duration (other than KVK training)
|
3
|
1 marks for each training
|
|
4
|
Contribution in village cluster/ speciality village development
|
5
|
1.5 marks for each cluster
|
|
5
|
Adoption of village
|
5
|
1.0 marks for each cluster
|
|
6
|
Exhibition organised
|
7
|
2 marks for each exhibition
|
|
7
|
Publication(s)
|
| -
Research paper
|
5
|
2 marks as main author
1 marks as co-author
|
| -
Books
|
5
|
3 marks per book
|
| -
Book Chapters
|
1 marks for each book chapter
|
| -
Bulletins/Popular Article/ Newsletters
|
5
|
1 marks for each
|
|
8
|
Use of ICT in Extension
|
4
|
1 marks for each involvement
|
|
9
|
Institution Building
|
3
|
1 marks for each involvement
|
|
10
|
Editor/Member of Editorial Board
|
3
|
1 marks for each involvement
|
|
11
|
Success story developed
|
5
|
2 marks for each involvement
|
|
|
Total
|
100
|
|
|
12
|
Faculty level committee evaluation
|
50
|
A faculty level committee will be constituted by the Dean, FA for the evaluation (Based on a score sheet as Annexure A)
|
|
13
|
Seminar Evaluation
|
50
|
At this stage three candidates will be shortlisted based on the above ranking (1st, 2nd, 3rd).
The three shortlisted candidates will deliver Faculty level seminar on a specified date. A panel of 5 member selection committee will select the best teacher from the three candidates (Based on a score sheet as Annexure B)
|
|
DETAILS OF ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE – A (PROFORMA FOR FACULTY LEVEL COMMITTEE’S EVALUATION)
Sl. No.
|
Attributes of a Good Teacher
|
Excellent
(5)
|
Very
Good ( 4 )
|
Good
(3)
|
Fair
(2)
|
Poor
(0)
|
(A)
|
Skill in handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Class/Lab/Field/Demonstration
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
High level of standards of instructions as evident from material designed, developed, used and multiplied
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
An ideal relationship established between seniors, colleagues and students as well as others for the welfare of the Deptt./ Faculty/ University
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Punctuality and adherence to discipline
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Active involvement in extracurricular activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Intellectual honesty and sincerity to the purpose
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Participation in national and international group forums and/ status acquired in these
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Involvement in Student's capacity building
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
Relation with other staff
|
Extremely Cordial(5)
|
Cordial(3)
|
Cordial Occasionally(1)
|
Indifferent(0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C) Behavioural Assessment
|
Overall Personality
|
Outstanding (5)
|
Excellent (4)
|
V. Good (3)
|
Good (2)
|
Fairly good (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEXURE - B (SEMINAR EVALUATION)
Members
|
Selection of topic (10 )
|
Content of the topic(10)
|
Visuals used
(10 )
|
Delivery
(10)
|
Question answer/discussion (10)
|
Total (50)
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEXURE - C (CURRENT STUDENT/ALUMNI EVALUATION)
Selection of Alumni for the evaluation process will be done by the FACULTY LEVEL EVALUATION COMMITTEE, AAU, Jorhat.
(To be filled the Alumni/Current student)
Name of the Alumni :
Degree obtained (Tick mark) : Bachelor/Master/Doctorate
Discipline:___________________________________________________
Name three scientist/teachers who in your opinion did excellent teaching in your discipline during your study at the University. Please assign scores as per the score sheet below
Sl. No.
|
Name of Scientist/Teacher
|
Course(s) Taught
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
xxx --- xxx
Dostları ilə paylaş: | 
