Office of the dean :: faculty of agriculture :: aau : jorhat-13 Circular

Format for Best Teacher Assessment

(To be filled by the Teacher)

(Assessment period - 01 January 2012 to 31 December, 2016)
Name of the Faculty :
Total length of teaching at UG and PG level : ............................................. Years.
Academic Achievements:

1. 
   (a) Number of courses taught by the Faculty member (Please enclose list of course)
   

Courses Taught	Titles of the Course	Credit Hours	Contact hours per week	Nos. Of Teachers involved	1^st Semester	IInd Semester
a)U.G.
b) P.G.

1. (b) No. of Lectures actually taken at P.G. and U.G. level for last 5 years.

Lecture Taken	Years
	1	2	3	4	5
P.G.
U.G.

2. 
   Specific efforts made for improving teaching methodology
   

Material	UG/PG	Title of the courses
a) Manual Prepared
b)Audio Visual prepared
c)Instructional material/ Aid developed
d)Innovations in teaching student discussion, Term Papers
e)Seminars
f)Course outline / Lesson plan given to student
g)Contribution made to the development of course Curriculum

3. 
   (a) No. of students guided M.Sc./PhD (Year wise) those who received degree in the last 5 years.
   

Name of Students	Degree	Thesis Title	Name of the Institute	Year of Passing

(b) Research Projects carried out

Title of the Project	Name of the Funding Agency	Comparative Mode/ Assigned	PI/Co PI	Duration	Amount (Rs. in lakh)	Significant achievement (50 words)

4. 
   Any Training programme ( related to teaching ) conducted in last 5 years
   

SL. No.	Title of the training programme	Duration and date	Funding Agency	Number of Participants	Role Played as

5. Publication:

a) Publication out of student thesis (enclose one set of reprints.)

Sl. No.	Title of the thesis	Name of the author(s)	Title of the paper	Year of publication with journal, volume & pages	NAAS (2015) ID	NAAS (2015) Score

b) Publication out of research work other than student thesis during last 5 years from non-student research (enclose one set of reprints.)

Sl. No.	Name of the author(s)	Title of the paper	Year of publication with journal, volume & pages	NAAS (2015)ID	NAAS (2015) Score

c) Books (Title, authors, publishers, pages)

d) Book Chapters (Title, book title, publishers, page numbers)

6. Information about any student of the Faculty Member having won medal or ICAR

Thesis Award/INSA Award/Society Award for thesis Work.

7. Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals (Provide detail information)

Signature of the applicant

Format for Best Scientist Assessment

(To be filled by the Scientist)

(Assessment period - 01 January 2012 to 31 December, 2016)

Name of the Faculty :
Total length of Research : ............................................. Years.
Research Achievements :

1. 
   (a) Research Projects carried out (Institutional Projects)
   

Title of the Project	Name of the Funding Agency	Comparative Mode/ Assigned	PI/Co PI	Duration	Amount (Rs. in lakh)	Significant achievement (50 words)

1 (b) Research Projects carried out (Competitive grants)

Title of the Project	Name of the Funding Agency	Comparative Mode/ Assigned	PI/Co PI	Duration	Amount (Rs. in lakh)	Significant achievement (50 words)

1 (c) Any Training programme ( related to research ) conducted in last 5 years

SL. No.	Title of the training programme	Duration and date	Funding Agency	Number of Participants	Role Played as

2. Publication:

a) Publication from Research (enclosed one set of reprints.)

Sl. No.	Title of the thesis	Name of the author(s)	Title of the paper	Year of publication with journal, volume & pages	NAAS (2015) ID	NAAS (2015) Score

b) Books (Title, authors, publishers, pages)

c) Book Chapters (Title, book title, publishers, page numbers)

3. Technology Developed

Sl. No.	No. and Name of the technology	Year of recommendation	Whether commercialized or not?	Area/Region for which recommended	Probable adoption of the technology

4. Organizational Capacity

a) Seminars, Conferences, Symposia, Workshops Organized

Name of the Seminar/Conference/Symposia/Workshops etc.	Name of the Sponsoring Agency	Place & Date

b) Membership of Journals/Professional Society/ Editorship of Journals/Professional Society:

c) Seminars, Conferences, Symposia Workshops etc. Attended

Title of the Seminar/Conference/Symposia/Workshops, place and Date	Presented Paper (Proceedings)	Acted as Chairman/Co-Chairman of a Session

5. Information about any student of the Faculty Member having won medal or ICAR Thesis Award/INSA Award/Society Award for thesis Work

6. Editor/members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals (provide details information).

7. Patent/IPR obtained/applied : (Provide details with documentary evidence)

Signature of the applicant

Format for Best Extension Personnel Assessment

(To be filled by the Extension Personnel)

(Assessment period – 01 January, 2012 to 31 December, 2016)
Name of the Faculty :
Research Achievements :

1. 
   Involvement in research project (allotted research project/ externally funded project)
   

Sl. No.	Project title	Involvement as	Funding Authority	Impact/Result

2. 
   (a) Technology development/ dissemination (Development/ replacement of technology/ participatory
   

technology development, concept, methodology, GI, patent etc. )

2. 
   Technology Assessment/ Refinement
   

Sl. No.	Technology	Assessed/ Refined	Year	Impact/Result

3. 
   (a) Experience in field level extension (problem solving)
   

Sl. No.	Involvement as	From	To	Years	Awards if any

(b) Demonstrations conducted

Sl. No.	Crop/Technology	No(s).	Area (ha)	Year	Impact

(c) Vocational training conducted

Sl. No.	Title of course	Funding Authority	Duration	Year	Impact

(d) Extension workshop/ Symposia attended (other than KVK Zonal & Annual Workshop)

Sl. No.	Name	Regional	National	International	AAU

(e) Organisation of training programmes of 5 days or more duration (other than KVK training)

Sl. No.	Course Title	Duration	Sponsor

4. 
   Contribution in village cluster/ speciality village development
   

Sl. No.	Name of village	Speciality	Technology Injected	Spread/Extent

5. 
   Adoption of village
   

   Sl. No.	Name of village	Involved as	Technology injected

6. 
   Exhibition organised
   

   Sl. No.	Title of the Exhibition	Year	Organised by	Place

7. 
   Publication(s)
   

1. 
   Research paper :
   
2. 
   Books :
   
3. 
   Book Chapters :
   
4. 
   Bulletins :
   
5. 
   Popular Article :
   
6. 
   Newsletters :
   

8. 
   Use of ICT in Extension
   

1. 
   Website :
   
2. 
   SMS service :
   
3. 
   Mobile solution :
   

9. 
   Institution Building (Lab development, Farm development, Demonstration unit) :
   

Sl. No.	Development/Building of	Utilization	Return earned if any

10. 
    Editor/Member of Editorial Board (Newsletter/ Farm Magazine/ Training Manual)
    

11. 
    Success story developed
    

Sl. No.	Name of ther person(s)/group(s)	Involvement as	Technology	Where Published

Signature of the applicant

APPLICATION GUIDELINE

NOTES:

1. 
   Once Awarded Teachers will not be eligible for next 5 consecutive academic years.
   
2. 
   Newly Recruited Teachers will be eligible after completion of 5 Year.
   

TEACHING:

1. Number of courses taught: Marks will be assigned based on Total contact hours, 1 mark for every contact hour (Maximum marks 20).

2. Specific efforts made for improving teaching methodology (Maximum marks 10)

a) Manual Prepared: 1 mark for each manual prepared for each course

b) Audio Visual prepared: 1 mark for each audio visual prepared for each course

c) Instructional material/ Aid developed: 1 mark for each Instruction material/aid developed for each course

d) Innovations in teaching student discussion, Term Papers: 0.5 marks for each term paper

e) Seminars 0.5 marks for each seminar assigned

f) Course outline / Lesson plan given to student: 0.5 marks for each lesson plan for each course

g) Contribution made to the development of course Curriculum: 0.5 marks for each course curriculum development

3 (a) No. of students guided M.Sc./PhD: 3 marks for each Ph. D students guided, 2 marks for each M. Sc students guided (Maximum marks 10)

3 (b) Research Projects carried out: 3 marks for each project handled as PI, 1 mark for each project handled as Co-PI (Maximum marks 10)

4. Training programme conducted: 2.5 marks per training conducted (Maximum marks 5)

5 (a) & (b). Publication: Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication (5 a. Maximum marks 10, 5 b Maximum marks 5)

5 (c) & (d). Books and Books chapters: 3 marks per book , 1 mark per book chapter (Maximum marks 5)

6. Awards and medals: 2.5 marks for each award (Maximum marks 5)

7. Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals: 1 mark for each involvement (Maximum marks 3)

8. Current student’s evaluation (10 marks)

9. Alumni’s evaluation (7 marks)

RESEARCH:

1. (a) Research Projects carried out: 3 marks for each project handled as PI, 1 mark for each project handled as Co-PI (Maximum marks 10)

1. (b). Competitive projects obtained: 3 marks for each project handled as PI,1 marks for each project handled as Co- PI (Maximum marks 10)

1. (c) Training programme conducted: 5 marks per training conducted (Maximum marks 10)

2 Publication: Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication multiplied by 1 for First author or 0.75 for rest of the authors (2 a. Maximum marks 10)

2 (b) & (c). Books and Books chapters: 3 marks per book , 1 mark per book chapter (Maximum marks 5)

3. Technology developed: 2 marks for each technology developed as PI, 1 mark for each technology developed as Co-PI (Maximum marks 10)

4 (a). Organizational capacity: 2.5 marks for each. (Maximum marks 10)

4 (b). Membership of Journals: 1 mark for each involvement. (Maximum marks 5)

4 (c). Seminar, conferences etc attended. 1 mark for each involvement (Maximum marks 10)

5. Awards and medals: 2.5 marks for each award (Maximum marks 5)

6. Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals: 1 mark for each involvement (Maximum marks 5)

7. Patent/IPR obtained/applied: 3 marks for patent obtained, 1 marks for patent applied (Maximum marks 10)

Extension:

1. 
   Involvement in research project: 3 marks for each Research Project handled as PI. 1 mark for each project as Co-PI (Maximum marks 5)
   
2. 
   a. Technology development/ dissemination: 2 marks each as PI, 1 mark each as Co-PI (Maximum marks 5)
   

2 b. Technology Assessment/ Refinement: 1 mark (Maximum marks 5)

3. 
   a. Experience in field level extension: 1 mark for each year (Maximum marks 10)
   

3. 
   b. Demonstrations conducted: 2 marks per demonstration (Maximum marks 10)
   

3. 
   c. Vocational training conducted: 1 mark for each training (Maximum marks 10)
   

3 d. Extension workshop/ Symposia attended (other than KVK Zonal & Annual Workshop): 1 marks for each training (Maximum marks 5)

3 e. Organisation of training programmes of 5 days or more duration (other than KVK training): 1 marks for each training (Maximum marks 3)

3. 
   Contribution in village cluster/ speciality village development: 1.5 marks for each cluster (Maximum marks 5)
   
4. 
   Adoption of village: 1.0 marks for each cluster (Maximum marks 5)
   
5. 
   Exhibition organised: 2 marks for each exhibition (Maximum marks 7)
   
6. 
   Publication(s):
   

1. 
   Research paper: 2 marks as main author , 1 marks as co-author (Maximum marks 5)
   
2. 
   Books: 3 marks per book c. Book Chapters: 1 mark for each book chapter (Maximum marks 5)
   

4. 
   Bulletins/Popular Article/ Newsletters: 1 marks for each (Maximum marks 5)
   

3. 
   Use of ICT in Extension: 1 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 4)
   
4. 
   Institution Building: 1 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 3 )
   
5. 
   Editor/Member of Editorial Board: 1 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 3)
   
6. 
   Success story developed: 2 marks for each involvement (Maximum marks 5)
   

SCORE SHEET AND SCORING GUIDE (TEACHING)

Sl. No.	Head of assessment	Maximum marks allotted	Scoring guideline	Marks obtained by the candidate
1	Number of courses taught	20	Marks will be assigned based on Total contact hours. 1 mark for every contact hour
2	Improving teaching methodology	10	As per the guideline provided
3 (a)	No. of students guided M.Sc./PhD	10	3 marks for each Ph. D students guided 2 marks for each M. Sc students guided
3( b)	Research Projects carried out	10	3 marks for each project handled as PI 1 marks for each project handled as Co-PI
4	Training programme conducted	5	2.5 marks per training conducted
5 (a)	Publication out of student's thesis	10	Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication
5 (b)	Publication out of research work other than student's thesis	5	Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication
5 (c) & (d)	Books and Books chapters	5	3 marks per book 1 mark per book chapter
6	Awards	5	2.5 marks for each award
7	Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals	3	1 mark for each involvement
8	Current student’s evaluation	10	Average of current student's assessment as per the score sheet at
9	Alumni's assessment	7	Average of Alumni's assessment as per the score sheet at
	Total Score	100
10	Faculty level committee evaluation	50	A faculty level committee will be constituted by the Dean, FA for the evaluation (Based on a score sheet as Annexure A)
11	Seminar Evaluation	50	At this stage three candidates will be shortlisted based on the above ranking (1st, 2nd, 3rd). The three shortlisted candidates will deliver Faculty level seminar on a specified date. A panel of 5 member selection committee will select the best teacher from the three candidates (Based on a score sheet as Annexure B)

SCORE SHEET AND SCORING GUIDE (RESEARCH)

Sl. No.	Head of assessment	Maximum marks allotted	Scoring guideline	Marks obtained by the candidate
1( a)	Research Projects carried out (Institutional)	10	3 marks for each project handled as PI 1 marks for each experiment conducted
1 (b)	Research Projects carried out (Competitive)	10	3 marks for each project handled as PI 1 marks for each experiment conducted
1 (c)	Training programme conducted	10	5 marks per training conducted
2 (a)	Publication out of research work	10	Sum total of NAAS rating of each publication
2 (b) & (c)	Books and Books chapters	5	3 marks per book 1 mark per book chapter
3	Technology developed	10	2 marks for each technology developed as PI 1 marks for each technology developed as Co-PI
4 (a)	Organizational capacity (Seminars, conference etc)	10	2.5 marks for each involvement
4 (b)	Membership of Journals	5	1 mark for each involvement
4 (c)	Seminars conferences etc attended	10	1 mark for each involvement
5	Awards	5	2.5 marks for each award
6	Editor/ members in Editorial Board in NAAS rated/ISI rated Journals	5	1 mark for each involvement
7	Patent/IPR obtained/applied	10	3 marks for patent obtained, 1 marks for patent applied
	Total Score	100
8	Faculty level committee evaluation	50	A faculty level committee will be constituted by the Dean, FA for the evaluation (Based on a score sheet as Annexure A)
9	Seminar Evaluation	50	At this stage three candidates will be shortlisted based on the above ranking (1st, 2nd, 3rd). The three shortlisted candidates will deliver Faculty level seminar on a specified date. A panel of 5 member selection committee will select the best teacher from the three candidates (Based on a score sheet as Annexure B)

SCORE SHEET AND SCORING GUIDE (EXTENSION PERSONNEL)

Sl. No.	Head of assessment	Maximum marks allotted	Scoring guideline	Marks obtained by the candidate
1	Involvement in research project	5	3 marks for each Research Project handled as PI. 1 mark for each project as Co-PI
2 (a)	Technology development/ dissemination	5	2 marks each as PI 1 mark each as Co-PI
2 (b)	Technology Assessment/ Refinement	5	1 mark
3 (a)	Experience in field level extension	10	1 mark for each year
3 (b)	Demonstrations conducted	10	2 marks per demonstration
3 (c)	Vocational training conducted	10	1 mark for each training
3 (d)	Extension workshop/ Symposia attended (other than KVK Zonal & Annual Workshop)	5	1 marks for each training
3 (e)	Organisation of training programmes of 5 days or more duration (other than KVK training)	3	1 marks for each training
4	Contribution in village cluster/ speciality village development	5	1.5 marks for each cluster
5	Adoption of village	5	1.0 marks for each cluster
6	Exhibition organised	7	2 marks for each exhibition
7	Publication(s)
	Research paper	5	2 marks as main author 1 marks as co-author
	Books	5	3 marks per book
	Book Chapters		1 marks for each book chapter
	Bulletins/Popular Article/ Newsletters	5	1 marks for each
8	Use of ICT in Extension	4	1 marks for each involvement
9	Institution Building	3	1 marks for each involvement
10	Editor/Member of Editorial Board	3	1 marks for each involvement
11	Success story developed	5	2 marks for each involvement
	Total	100
12	Faculty level committee evaluation	50	A faculty level committee will be constituted by the Dean, FA for the evaluation (Based on a score sheet as Annexure A)
13	Seminar Evaluation	50	At this stage three candidates will be shortlisted based on the above ranking (1st, 2nd, 3rd). The three shortlisted candidates will deliver Faculty level seminar on a specified date. A panel of 5 member selection committee will select the best teacher from the three candidates (Based on a score sheet as Annexure B)

DETAILS OF ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE – A (PROFORMA FOR FACULTY LEVEL COMMITTEE’S EVALUATION)

Sl. No.	Attributes of a Good Teacher	Excellent (5)	Very Good ( 4 )	Good (3)	Fair (2)	Poor (0)
(A)	Skill in handling
1	Class/Lab/Field/Demonstration
2	High level of standards of instructions as evident from material designed, developed, used and multiplied
3	An ideal relationship established between seniors, colleagues and students as well as others for the welfare of the Deptt./ Faculty/ University
4	Punctuality and adherence to discipline
5	Active involvement in extracurricular activities
6	Intellectual honesty and sincerity to the purpose
7	Participation in national and international group forums and/ status acquired in these
8	Involvement in Student's capacity building

(B) Relation with other staff	Extremely Cordial(5)	Cordial(3)	Cordial Occasionally(1)	Indifferent(0)

(C) Behavioural Assessment	Overall Personality
	Outstanding (5)	Excellent (4)	V. Good (3)	Good (2)	Fairly good (1)

ANNEXURE - B (SEMINAR EVALUATION)

Members	Selection of topic (10 )	Content of the topic(10)	Visuals used (10 )	Delivery (10)	Question answer/discussion (10)	Total (50)
1
2
3
4
5
Average

ANNEXURE - C (CURRENT STUDENT/ALUMNI EVALUATION)

Selection of Alumni for the evaluation process will be done by the FACULTY LEVEL EVALUATION COMMITTEE, AAU, Jorhat.

(To be filled the Alumni/Current student)

Name of the Alumni :

Degree obtained (Tick mark) : Bachelor/Master/Doctorate

Discipline:___________________________________________________

Name three scientist/teachers who in your opinion did excellent teaching in your discipline during your study at the University. Please assign scores as per the score sheet below

Sl. No.	Name of Scientist/Teacher	Course(s) Taught
1
2
3

xxx --- xxx