J Comp German Linguistics (2015)
:183–212
DOI 10.1007/s10828-015-9075-0
ORIGINAL PAPER
The morphological structure of complex place names:
the case of Dutch
Bj¨orn K¨ohnlein
1
Received: 4 October 2013 / Accepted: 11 March 2014 / Published online: 22 September 2015
© The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract In the theoretical literature, it is generally assumed that place names are
morphologically simplex, at least from a synchronic perspective. This derives from
the observation that constituents of complex place names often become opaque over
time. Along these lines, place names like Dutch Amsterdam cannot be synchronically
compositional because Amster- does not exist as an independent morpheme in Dutch.
Contrary to this view, this paper argues that many (Dutch) place names are in fact
synchronically complex, in spite of their semantic non-transparency. Evidence comes
from the phonological behavior of the names in question: in Dutch, place names are
often the sole apparent exceptions to otherwise strong restrictions on stress assign-
ment and phonotactics. Yet under close inspection, it becomes evident that these
names are not phonologically exceptional at all: they display regular phonological
behavior that is characteristic of morphologically complex words, derived via suffix-
ation or compounding. Furthermore, it is argued that the complex structures found in
Dutch place names are by no means idiosyncratic to this group of words: similar pat-
terns are found in place naming in various other languages as well as in the formation
of some types of nominal compounds in Dutch (such as the formation of names for
ball games).
Keywords Place names
· Toponyms · Semantic transparency · Semantic opacity ·
Classifier
· Dutch phonology
Bj¨orn K¨ohnlein
koehnlein.3@osu.edu
1
Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, 108a Stadium East, 1961 Tuttle Park Place,
Columbus, OH 43210-1234, USA
18
184
B. K¨ohnlein
Dostları ilə paylaş: |