Page 1 Report Substrate Materials for intersectoral biogas strategy Foreword



Yüklə 1,22 Mb.
səhifə20/27
tarix15.05.2018
ölçüsü1,22 Mb.
#50477
1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   ...   27

174

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

Feed-in tariff for biogas at gas station

Description: By introducing a guaranteed selling price for biogas refueling can guarantee

profitability of biogas producer, given that the feed-in-tariff is high enough. More details about the instrument

can be found in the tool menu 1

The desired effect: Increasing the production of biogas, and ensure that it is used for transportation purposes.

Feature: This instrument has good management efficiency. By adjusting the tariff will trigger

desired amount of biogas production. Since the feed-in-tariff only applies to sales to service stations will

it is likely but not guaranteed that the biogas will be used for transportation purposes.

Introduce a tax on natural gas unless

it fulfilled a%-vis requirement

biogas intervention

Description: As described above, all measures which are aimed at increasing the proportion of gas vehicles

also increase the use of natural gas, unless it simultaneously introduce a higher fee for natural gas

so that biogas is considerable less expensive compared to natural gas. A possible remedy here is to introduce

for example, a CO

2

Tax on natural gas, but unless it is mixed in a certain proportion of biogas. The requirement



the interference percentage can be increased gradually as more biogas becomes available on the market.

The desired effect: Increase production and use of biogas.

Feature: This instrument is partially effective governance. It ensures that the proportion of biogas increases relative to

natural gas, but not the production and use of gas generally increases.

Possible drawbacks: By introducing a tax on natural gas demand for such

gas-powered vehicles is reduced, because these can also use natural gas.



Page 175

175

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

3.2 Increased use of bio fertilizer

3.2.1 Legal instruments

Stricter requirements in fertilizer products Regulations

for storage and distribution of

Fertilizer

The desired effect: The revision of fertilizer products Regulation, the main purpose being to ensure that emissions

to water and air is limited and most of the added nutrients (such as nitrogen and P) used

of crops. It is possible that this will lead to requirements for manure and mineral fertilizers

favors the use of organic fertilizer

Feature: This instrument is moderately effective management for increased use of bio fertilizer. Depends

much of the design. Any stricter other fertilizers will increase the profitability of

to use organic fertilizer. Maximum Requirements for supply of phosphorus and covering all fertilizers will probably

be beneficial for the application of organic fertilizer but does not ensure provision of agriculture in the districts

has a large feed imports that livestock production is large compared to the need.

Possible drawbacks: Such requirements would increase costs for farmers who have too much manure.

Feasibility: Good

Conducted in neighboring countries: No.

Changing demands in the fertilizer product regulation to

heavy metal content in bio fertilizer

The desired effect: Harmonised requirements for all fertilizers / soil improvers regard. Containing

heavy metals will improve the bio fertilizer position compared to eg manure and

mineral fertilizers.

Feature: As of today, the requirement for heavy metal content related to tonnes of dry matter. Through

biogas process goes down solids content, organic material is methane instead. Content

nitrogen, phosphorus mm. but also heavy metals remain the same in absolute amounts, but in relation to

amount TS increases. Therefore requires a smaller amount of organic fertilizer to supply certain quantities

nitrogen and phosphorus. One can replace relation to dry weight, with a ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus.

Possible drawbacks: bio fertilizer can be perceived as "less pure" than other fertilizers

Feasibility: Good

Conducted in neighboring countries:?

Page 176

176

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

Development of standards /

declaration of contents for bio fertilizer

The desired effect: the development of standards / content declaration will make use of bio fertilizer more

attractive. The revised regulations fertilizer products will be requirements for fertilizer plan to plan

added amounts of nutrients. If instead of standard introduces a declaration of

content of nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium based on calculations and / or analysis

bio fertilizer will improve its position clear in relation to manure and mineral fertilizers.

Attribute: Medium control effectively, especially by a declaration of contents of the nitrogen content,

phosphorus and potassium. It can be based on a calculation based on the incoming raw optionally

supplemented by analyzes.

Possible drawbacks: Possibly costs, but these are believed to be small especially for content declaration.

Feasibility: Good

Conducted in neighboring countries: Unknown



3.2.2 Economic instruments

Support for the analysis of bio fertilizer

The desired effect: increased use of bio fertilizer

Attribute: Medium control effectively the same reason that the introduction of standard / content declaration

Possible disadvantages: Additional administration

Feasibility: Good

Conducted in neighboring countries:

Development of fertilizer calculator

containing organic fertilizer

The desired effect: Make use of bio fertilizer more attractive, in the same way that "the development of

standards / content declaration "and" support the analysis of digestate. "

Attribute: Medium control effectively



Page 177

177

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

Possible Disadvantages: None known

Feasibility: Good, consistent with expected changes in fertilizer products Regulations

Support for the transport of organic fertilizer for

suitable distribution areas

The desired effect: better utilization of bio fertilizer.

Feature: It is good management efficiency if one adds the requirement to spread the area to receive

Center. By adjusting the amount of aid will also be able to ensure that it is more profitable to spread

bio fertilizer in relation to the use of fertilizers or other ways to treat organic fertilizer.

Possible Disadvantages: Costly for budgetary authorities, especially if it should happen

further growth in livestock and fertilizer production areas without the need for more fertilizer.

Feasibility: Good, except for costs

Conducted in neighboring countries: Not available

Support for the processing of organic fertilizer

(Pelleting or similar)

The desired effect: Increased use of / demand for bio fertilizer by creating products that are

easier to handle / transport

Attribute sure management efficiency depends much on products

Tax on nitrogen and phosphorus in

fertilizer

Description: It is a tax on the content of nitrogen and possibly phosphorus fertilizer. The fee

will raise the cost of fertilizer and thus increase the value of manure and organic fertilizer. This could increase

value of organic fertilizer and thus the motivation for the supply of manure and organic waste

the biogas plant, if the processing and storage at the biogas plant can help to improve the utilization

of nitrogen and phosphorus in these raw materials.

Page 178

178

M

To



L

Instrument



Increased access

of raw material

Increased biogas

production

Increased

application

Fertilizer

Fertilizer

Wet

Wet

Biogas

Bio fertilizer

Legal

Economic

Informative

The desired effect: The main purpose of a tax on nitrogen and possibly phosphorus fertilizers to

reduce the loss of nutrients and emissions to water and air and better utilization of such manure

and organic waste. Any increase in the amount of manure and waste for biogas plants will therefore

simply be a side effect.

Feature: This instrument can be regarded as medium to good governance effectively when the main objective is to ensure

better utilization of manure with less loss and reduced discharge of nutrients to water and

ammonia to air. However, there are several ways to accomplish this than treatment in biogas plants and

value of manure will be increased in nearly the same rate as the value of organic fertilizer. This may result

fewer want to give up the manure into biogas plant management effectiveness in terms of

biogas target is probably relatively small.

Possible drawbacks: Previous experience with a nitrogen charge until 2003 and financial calculations

shows that the tax must be fairly high (50-100% of the price of fertilizer nitrogen to have a

effect of importance on the use of mineral fertilizers). It will not accept farmers without some form of

compensation, for example. in the form of a rollback. This instrument can also have an adverse regional

effect, since agriculture in areas with low animal and get biogas plants will not have easy access to

fertilizer and organic fertilizer.

Feasibility: Significant resistance among industry players and agricultural management including LMD

Conducted in neighboring countries: Denmark has a very small fee, Sweden had a charge in the period

1980-2010



3.2.3 Informative instruments

Information campaign on the use of

bio fertilizer

Description: Information campaigns on the use of organic fertilizer could increase knowledge and thus

demand / willingness to pay for organic fertilizer. It will, however, depend on whether one has positive news to

inform.


The desired effect: More bio fertilizer applied most cost effective

Possible Disadvantages: None known

Feasibility: Good

Page 179

179

4 Transverse measures

This chapter describes the transverse measures that will:

 Contribute to increase biogas production in general

 Contribute to increased knowledge

 Help to reduce the risk of negative effects of an biogassatsing

4.1 Transverse measures to increase biogas production

Study Support related to the optimization of climate and environmental benefits: In order to optimize both

positioning and dimensioning of the biogas plant, for example, models such as those of

Østfoldforskning (2012) is used. A possible remedy is to provide evaluation support for projects

during planning so that they can make use of such a tool. Using such a model,

be possible to quantify climate benefits and cost of the enterprise for different solutions. If the

selected facility will have a very favorable climate benefit at the expense of corporate profitability, the

imagine that Enova / SLF / MD can provide support to cover the increased costs.

Improved communication between the players: Since the value chain of biogas and bio fertilizer involving

many different actors, it is advantageous that collaboration across traditional sectoral divisions

occurs. In the survey conducted in this work, it was pointed out that there is a

need to establish platforms that meeting point for players. In Sweden, it created some

Web portals for biogas consisting of various stakeholders, such as www.biogasportalen.se and

www.sgc.se.

National Working Group on Biogas: A working group to follow up the developments in the biogas market

over time may contribute to the adaptation of means to a changing market. Simultaneously,

working group to monitor the development of biogas production and ensure that any

objectives are achieved. Denmark has established a working group to monitor developments

for biogas development and guide biogas projects under Energiavftalen adopted in March

2012. It is set by nearly 10 million Danish kroner to the Working Group for the period 2012-2015.



Page 180

180

4.2 Transverse measures to increase knowledge

Better statistics: As of today, there are no good statistics on the amount of biogas produced and

used or quantity of waste used for this in Norway. It may be appropriate that the SSB

establish such statistics for biogas production and improves the static for wet organic industrial waste.

This will make it easier to adapt programs in a better way.

Research and development (R & D): R & D may contribute to reduced costs for biogas production and increased

environmental benefit. In particular, some areas that need increased research activity:

 Process Optimization (temperature, time, etc.) and substrate compositions and how these

affecting gas yield

 Pretreatment increasing biogas yield

 New technology such as dry processes that can reduce the investment cost to

biogas plants

 New substrates / raw materials, such as birch wood chips, park and garden, seaweed, ("eaves

meadows ") and waste from agriculture (straw, potato waste, waste from vegetable production, hay, grass and

silage that keeps feed quality)

 Better documented effect of the use of organic fertilizer on soil ecology, plant growth and reduced

need for pesticides.

 Better documented effect on greenhouse gas emissions in biogas production and storage and

application of organic fertilizer

 Knowledge of cost-effective technology in smaller facilities and sambehandlingsanlegg, custom

Norwegian conditions.

 Knowledge of dense storage of organic fertilizer, and emissions of methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia.

R & D needs for biogas production from manure

It is relatively large uncertainties associated with the calculated values ​​for costs, emission reductions,

environmental benefits and other benefits that are used in Klimakur / rural sector report / value chain report and

Now in this report biogas, especially for production based on manure. This is because in

Norway's only a couple of small biogas plants for manure and no major. The same applies

plant sambehandling of organic waste and manure. Costs and experiences with

operation of such facilities abroad are not easily transferred to Norway. The main

uncertainty factors are:

 Uncertainty about the actual costs of major facilities for manure and

sambehandlingsanlegg of manure and organic waste.

 Uncertainty about gas yield of the different fertilizer types and combinations of fertilizers

and admixing of other substrates.

 Uncertainty about the size of emissions reductions through treatment of various types

manure in biogas plants in the baseline scenario. Among other indications

the proliferation of bio fertilizer reduces emissions of nitrous oxide and runoff than rågjødsel but

documentation is inadequate.

 uncertainty in valuation of environmental benefits from reduced emissions of ammonia, nitrates and

phosphorus compounds.



Page 181

Yüklə 1,22 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   ...   27




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin