8
beginning to end; instead, it is better to identify important principles or elements in
the legislation and then discuss each of those in turn, illustrating with examples
from the practice; from foreign laws, in particular if these have influenced the
drafting, and from the old law in case the draft intends to amend an existing law.
In preparing the explanatory note the drafter should:
express the assumptions that are implicitly or explicitly made by the draft.
not be too philosophical; it is not good to problematize a legal text.
point out potential ambiguities or inconsistencies and suggest the intended
meaning. You must of course strive to make the draft as unambiguous as
possible. Such efforts of yours should not limit you from pointing out potential
ambiguities in the draft, if any.
Separate the explanation by title, chapter or section or part of the law being
explained. Your audience should be able to easily relate your explanation/ with the
relevant part of the draft. Usually commentaries are put by sections or chapters;
and the passage can refer to particular provisions when necessary. You can refer
to groups of provisions.
Put in a comparative tabular form the old law and the proposed amended or
revised version of the provisions for ease of comparison, in case of amendments
and revisions.
Dostları ilə paylaş: