30
result whereas avoidance behavior is exhibited to avoid a negative result. With this view,
Hammer says that privacy can then only be studied using psychophysiological tools, since
approach-avoidance behavior is exhibited at an unconscious level. Therefore, a survey would
not be effective at showing this. While laying his arguments,
Hammer says that the
individuals with the approach behavior are more likely to share their personal information on
social media than those with an avoidance behavior. To test the psychology behind privacy,
Hammer uses some psychophysiological tools to monitor heart rates of participants while
immersed in Facebook-like scenarios.
Hammer breaks his research into three essays based on the three viewpoints
introduced above. The following are the essays that make up the major part of his research:
Essay 1: Varying information sensitivity of personal information
In the introduction to this essay, Hammer highlights that privacy management has
been a topic of interest due to the wide adoption of IT into people’s lives. It is this adoption
that has seen people share out a lot of their information, something they would traditionally
avoid doing. A question of interest he poses in this essay is why an individual would give up
his or her privacy on social media sites. He explains that in social media sites, users ought to
understand that it is the data that they share with other users that is
mined by the platforms for
more personalized adverts, marketing for partners and even customizations for third-party
sites. Platforms such as Facebook will scrap all usable information from posts, messages, and
sites visited by a user, and even photos posted (with their face recognition engine). Due to
this, Hammer says that Facebook is only motivated towards encouraging users to share out
their information. This is what is good for business. If users
stop sharing the information,
Facebook’s business will be immensely affected.
31
Hammer says that privacy organizations have faulted the likes of Facebook for not
providing users with sufficient privacy controls. The organizations have further stated that the
attempts by social media companies to enhance their privacy controls have not been
satisfactory and more still needs to be done. Hammer, however, believes that there is a
misunderstanding due to the context of social media. It is unexpected that Facebook can
match the privacy levels of a site such as Amazon. The users on
those sites have different
expectations. For Amazon, the users will appreciate to know that their purchase history is
safe, their payment details are confidential and their delivery addresses are never disclosed to
the public. Facebook users, on the other hand, want to
post messages to other users, upload
new photos, chat with friends, like and comment on photos of friends and family as well as
read the comments on their own photos. The interactions described show that users in
Facebook want to continuously engage with other users by means of sharing some
information. They are looking for the social
experiences, they want the enjoyment and
satisfaction derived from those actions. Privacy is, therefore, not comparable between social
media sites and e-commerce stores.
Hammer also introduces the issue of the types of relationships on social media. He
gives another e-commerce example where he says that a transaction between the vendor and
the customer involves some privacy concerns. The customer is very concerned about the
privacy of his/her personal details, and this will form the basis of the relationship between the
customer and the social media site. On social media, the information
shared is mostly
intended to reach particular persons. Therefore, privacy concerns in social media are context-
specific and they also depend on the agent a user interacted with and the type of information
that was shared. Hammer chooses to focus on the type and the sensitivity of information
shared on social media.
32
In his research for this essay, Hammer chooses Facebook as the testing platform. He
says that his focus is on the user-user relationship. He poses a question about how privacy
influences the sharing of personal information in interpersonal relationships. He brings up
three points: how privacy differs in process-oriented and outcome-oriented systems, theories
for a better understanding of privacy, and how the sensitivity of the material to be shared
affects how it is shared. To carry out the study for this essay, Hammer gets a focus group that
is given information on the different sensitivity levels of information of social media. He then
carries out a pilot study to assess the fear of social exclusion and intention.
He then takes
another sample and carries out the real experiment.
In his findings and conclusion for this essay, Hammer says that there is a strong effect
of interpersonal beliefs on privacy concerns. Therefore, users will share more personal
information with the people they have strong relationships with. He also says that the fear of
being secluded only factors into the sharing of personal information only when the
information is of low sensitivity. Therefore, people that feel like they are secluded on social
media will give out some information on these platforms but it will not be highly sensitive.
Hammer believes that his study takes an often-ignored route in the research about social
media privacy.
Dostları ilə paylaş: